Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+EME\s+\/\s+500\/\-1\s+0\-\s+2\.5\s+Watts\s+per\s+stream\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+EME\s+\/\s+500\/\-1\s+0\-\s+2\.5\s+Watts\s+per\s+stream\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: EME / 500/-1 0- 2.5 Watts per stream (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 22:48:34 +0100; Will reduce to approx 2.5 Watt's per stream at 2300 local Tnx for reports G .. From: Graham Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 10:24 PM To: [email protected] [email protected] Subject:; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-05/msg00069.html (17,421 bytes)
2. Re: LF: EME / 500/-1 0- 2.5 Watts per stream (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 23:11:01 +0100; Ok well please keep the system running ... any decode is a good decode hihi 2.5 W is at the end of the text stream .. tnx - G .. Will reduce to approx 2.5 Watt's per stream at 2300 local Graham, LF Q; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-05/msg00231.html (20,136 bytes)
3. Re: LF: EME / 500/-1 0- 2.5 Watts per stream (score: 1): Author: Michel F5WK <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 00:02:01 +0200; Graham, LF QRN is getting worse, guess it is the limiting factor ... HF 1 bit: RX1: <20:18 UTC> <1,0 Hz> <[email protected]> <STOP> <-25 dB> RX1: <20:22 UTC> <0,0 Hz> <[email protected]> <STOP> <-27; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-05/msg00544.html (17,503 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]