Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+DFCW\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. LF: DFCW (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:02:55 -0400
A big THANK YOU to all who ran grabbers and sent captures last night. It is very much appreciated! I was seen by many in the U.S. plus G4DMA, 2E0ILY, DL/SWL, DF2JP and DK7FC. It is difficult to know
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-03/msg00228.html (8,015 bytes)

2. Re: LF: DFCW (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 18:01:40 -0400
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-03/msg00232.html (10,103 bytes)

3. LF: DFCW (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 15:13:27 +0100
After many years of using QRSS, I have been spurred into modifying my DDS to give me DFCW capability for the first time. Would experienced DFCW operators please give me the benefit of their experienc
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00167.html (8,608 bytes)

4. LF: DFCW (score: 1)
Author: "Rik Strobbe" <>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 1999 13:04:20
After consulting DF8ZR and DF6NM, who both are also active in DFCW, I would like to suggest a kind of temporary DFCW standard in order to enhance DFCW QSO's and avoid 'collisions' with other modes :
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-12/msg00020.html (9,287 bytes)

5. Re: LF: DFCW (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 1999 15:04:13 +0100
After consulting DF8ZR and DF6NM, who both are also active in DFCW, I would like to suggest a kind of temporary DFCW standard in order to enhance DFCW QSO's and avoid 'collisions' with other modes :
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-12/msg00021.html (9,158 bytes)

6. Re: LF: DFCW (score: 1)
Author: "Rik Strobbe" <>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 1999 16:32:55
All of Rik's standards look useful to me, but it is also essential to specify in the standard that the dash should be the higher (or lower) frequency. This is especially important if KK and RR are to
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-12/msg00022.html (8,904 bytes)

7. LF: DFCW (score: 1)
Author: "bernd grupe" <>
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2000 12:11:02 +0200
Hello Mike, tnx for fb qso at 0710 Z on Sunday morning (Apr. 02.00). I 'hd just aktivated my TRX when your sigs came with good O. Was running 20 watts pp in my marconi aerial. Distance is 666 km. DFC
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00003.html (7,901 bytes)

8. Re: LF: DFCW (score: 1)
Author: "jannsen" <t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:02:05 +0100
schrieb: I once implemented such "time marker lines" in Spectrum Lab (configurable from 1 sec per line to several minutes) but that feature seems to be hidden too deep in the configura
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-03/msg00094.html (8,493 bytes)

9. Re: LF: DFCW (score: 1)
Author: "Rik Strobbe" <>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:35:21
Hello Wolf, The problem is, PC clocks (though called 'Real Time Clocks') can be quite bad, much worse than the cheapest wristwatch you can buy in a coffee-store. So setting the clock for an accuracy
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-03/msg00117.html (10,057 bytes)

10. Re: LF: DFCW (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 13:06:01 EST
Well, the DCF77 decoder was a nice experiment, but not too much more than that. The problem is, PC clocks (though called 'Real Time Clocks') can be quite bad, much worse than the cheapest wristwatch
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-03/msg00133.html (9,211 bytes)

11. LF: DFCW (score: 1)
Author: "Rik Strobbe" <>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 15:57:47
At 14:03 20/03/01 -0000, G3AQC wrote: I experimented last night with slightly shorter dots- 25secs rather than my usual 30. This reduced my total message time (for three repeats of G3AQC) from 56mins
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-03/msg00146.html (11,149 bytes)

12. LF: DFCW (score: 1)
Author: "Alberto di Bene" <>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 01:27:43 +0200
In the attempt to further adjust the settings for optimal DFCW reception, this evening (or should I say morning...) I received G3AQC in this way : The single elements are clearly differentiated. Admi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-04/msg00036.html (8,007 bytes)

13. LF: DFCW (score: 1)
Author: "OSBORN, Chris" <>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 14:56:39 +0200
My new LF TX is nearly finished and I would like to add the option of DFCW. I was thinking of just placing a varicap diode in parallel with the crystal and thus pulling the frequency for achieving th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-09/msg00078.html (8,589 bytes)

14. Re: LF: DFCW (score: 1)
Author: Hartmut Wolff <>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:02:16 +0100
Hi Chris, Dave and Brian, I managed to get my DFCW rig mods done over the weekend and worked Dave G3WCB as my first contact in that mode. Nice DFCW signal here in Germany! I worked OH1TN last night -
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-11/msg00041.html (9,358 bytes)

15. LF: DFCW (score: 1)
Author: "OSBORN, Chris" <>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:45:41 +0100
I managed to get my DFCW rig mods done over the weekend and worked Dave G3WCB as my first contact in that mode. I worked OH1TN last night - DFCW both ways. He was a colossal signal and quite audible.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-11/msg00042.html (9,336 bytes)

16. Re: LF: DFCW (score: 1)
Author: "" <>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 12:46:50 +0100
Hello friends, I am available always for scets many greetings Tom DL4EAU Hi Hartmut OM, Many thanks again for your excellent screenshots - most useful indeed. Very little occurs on the 136 kHz band t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-12/msg00260.html (11,738 bytes)

17. RE: LF: DFCW (score: 1)
Author: "OSBORN, Chris" <>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 10:18:08 +0100
Hi Hartmut OM, Many thanks again for your excellent screenshots - most useful indeed. Very little occurs on the 136 kHz band that escapes your notice I think ! It's a pity that we missed DL4EAU earli
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-12/msg00262.html (10,215 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu