Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+DECCA\s+MAST\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+DECCA\s+MAST\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Decca mast (score: 1): Author: "Walter Blanchard" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 20:29:31 +0100; There's a pic of the Decca mast the DMG are using this weekend at: http://www.blacksheep.org/lf/decmast.jpg and a pic of the old Decca ATU coils at: http://www.blacksheep.org/lf/coils.jpg There had t; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00183.html (7,908 bytes)
2. LF: DECCA MAST (score: 1): Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 12:40:06 +0000; The signal from the SMALL mast is 5 db stronger than the LARGE Decca tower. As I mentioned in an earlier bulletin the comparison test is flawed. The large tower is vertical and the small antennas is; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00306.html (7,952 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]