Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+DCF39\s+info\s+please\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+DCF39\s+info\s+please\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: DCF39 info please (score: 1): Author: "Larry Kayser" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 20:51:34 -0400; Gentlemen: What I thought was DCF39 fading down into the noise now appears that they were off the air. The period of watching here was from close to 0040 utc tonight until 0053 when they have come ba; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00167.html (8,210 bytes)
2. Re: LF: DCF39 info please (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:36:42 +0000; Dear Larry & LF Group, I also noticed DCF39 was off air at about 0100utc last night. It was back on again later. I also heard what I think was CFH, bulding up to about 15-20dB above the noise floor b; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00169.html (8,548 bytes)
3. Re: LF: DCF39 info please (score: 1): Author: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 12:11:51; It certainly is. 100W versus 40kW is 'only' 26dB (even if the 'decca guys' only get 10W ERP it is an acceptable 36dB). But the fact that they are far more west compared to DCF39 may nibble of some dB; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00171.html (9,141 bytes)
4. Re: LF: DCF39 info please (score: 1): Author: "Holger 'Geri', DK8KW" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 08:15:39 -0400; Hi friends, In case Larry (or some others at the other side of the pond) watch the signal with Spectogram it might be a good idea to add 5 to 10 second 'dash' while beaconing (or next best a series o; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00175.html (8,894 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]