Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+DCF39\s+ERP\s+and\s+field\s+strength\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: DCF39 ERP and field strength (score: 1)
Author: Dick Rollema <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 12:44:56 +0200
Hello José, I found the following results for DCF39, using the CCIR curves: Sea Water, average salinity, conductivity 5 S/m, dielectric constant 70, EMRP = 40 kW. Wet Ground, conductivity 10 mS, diel
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-05/msg00058.html (13,564 bytes)

2. Re: LF: DCF39 ERP and field strength (score: 1)
Author: "Jose Manuel" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 01:00:47 +0200
Hello Dick: I took a plot, last month, of the transmission of a Spanish colleague, who is in Madrid, at 500 km as well, and the signal level during the day was not stable, varying around 3 or 4 dB; I
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-05/msg00059.html (13,221 bytes)

3. Re: LF: DCF39 ERP and field strength (score: 1)
Author: Dick Rollema <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 14:11:34 +0200
Dear Jose, You wrote: In the web of Geri, DK8KW, can be seen that DCF39 ERP is 40KW (22KW EMRP), based on measurements made by Geri some years ago. For this radiater power corresponds, at 1800 Km, in
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-05/msg00060.html (10,883 bytes)

4. Re: LF: DCF39 ERP and field strength (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 22:54:59 +0100
Hi Markus and Jose, I have just been looking at the ground wave level at Brian's CT1DRP a little further down the coast. My estimate is based on some concellation fades that occured on Brian's plot o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-05/msg00061.html (12,398 bytes)

5. Re: LF: DCF39 ERP and field strength (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 17:52:27 EDT
José, yes. During daylight hours, the level is fairly constant, but at night it fades up and down by perhaps 3 dB, sometimes more. Though that's just from memory, as it's been a while since I last di
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-05/msg00062.html (9,770 bytes)

6. Re: LF: DCF39 ERP and field strength (score: 1)
Author: "Jose Manuel" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 23:31:18 +0200
Hello Markus: Do you see any signal level variation in a 24 h period? About the radiated power, I´ll take into account the correction, thanks. 73, José, EA1PX -- Original Message -- From: MarkusVeste
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-05/msg00063.html (13,119 bytes)

7. Re: LF: DCF39 ERP and field strength (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 16:38:53 EDT
Hi José, though it is not explicitely mentioned in the caption beneath Geri's and Gamal's curve, I think their data actually mean a power of 40 kW EMRP (i.e. 125.6 dBµV/m at 1 km). Here at 310 km, I
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-05/msg00064.html (11,240 bytes)

8. LF: DCF39 ERP and field strength (score: 1)
Author: "Jose Manuel" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 12:55:39 +0200
Hello all In the web of Geri, DK8KW, can be seen that DCF39 ERP is 40KW (22KW EMRP), based on measurements made by Geri some years ago. For this radiater power corresponds, at 1800 Km, in function of
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-05/msg00065.html (9,550 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu