Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+AW\:\s+G3XIZ\s+CQ\s+137\.7\s+kHz\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+AW\:\s+G3XIZ\s+CQ\s+137\.7\s+kHz\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. LF: AW: G3XIZ CQ 137.7 kHz (score: 1): Author: "Joe" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 12:26:33 +0100; Hi Chris, very nice signal here G3XIZ.jpg 73 Joe DF2JP JO31hh Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Chris Osborn Gesendet: Samstag, 3. Jan; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-01/msg00042.html (13,772 bytes)
2. LF: AW: G3XIZ CQ 137.7 kHz (score: 1): Author: "Joe" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 12:36:11 +0100; Hi Chris, and again G3XIZ.jpg Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Chris Osborn Gesendet: Samstag, 3. Januar 2015 12:13 An: LF Group Betr; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-01/msg00043.html (13,388 bytes)
3. Re: LF: AW: G3XIZ CQ 137.7 kHz (score: 1): Author: Chris Osborn <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 11:49:31 +0000 (UTC); /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-01/msg00044.html (15,256 bytes)
4. Re: LF: AW: G3XIZ CQ 137.7 kHz (score: 1): Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 13:11:54 +0100; Hi Chris, also well readable in Nuernberg JN59NJ. Unfortunately DCF39 bursts are big here, attached screenshot is without noise blanking. Normally I have the SpecLab blanker engaged with short (1.5 m; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-01/msg00048.html (17,095 bytes)
5. Re: LF: AW: G3XIZ CQ 137.7 kHz (score: 1): Author: Chris Osborn <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 12:30:44 +0000 (UTC); Many thanks Marcus for the useful screen shot. My next few transmissions will be on 137.63 kHz to clear your QRM. 73 Chris On Saturday, 3 January 2015, 12:14, Markus Vester <[email protected]> wro; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-01/msg00049.html (19,671 bytes)
6. Re: LF: AW: G3XIZ CQ 137.7 kHz (score: 1): Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 13:32:07 +0100; Here's a nicer one for keeping - this is pretty much the best I can do using the noise blanker with 9 dB threshold. 73, Markus From: [email protected] Markus Vester Sent: Saturday, January 03, 201; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-01/msg00050.html (18,503 bytes)
7. Re: LF: AW: G3XIZ CQ 137.7 kHz (score: 1): Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 13:49:10 +0100; Chris, very nice! Here's your last over, with the NB switched off after the first quarter. You're nicely put in the middle of the gap now. There seems to be a weak QRM line exactly on 630, so finetun; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-01/msg00052.html (20,331 bytes)
8. Re: LF: AW: G3XIZ CQ 137.7 kHz (score: 1): Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 14:13:07 +0100; Just perfect! 73, Markus (DF6NM) From: Markus Vester Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2015 1:49 PM To: [email protected] [email protected] Subject: Re: LF: AW: G3XIZ CQ 137.7 kHz Chr; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-01/msg00054.html (21,864 bytes)
9. Re: LF: AW: G3XIZ CQ 137.7 kHz (score: 1): Author: Chris Osborn <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 13:17:34 +0000 (UTC); Thanks again Joe and Markus for the great screen shots. I'm trying 137.635 kHz now to clear that QRM. I'm just looking at my old LF logbook of ten years ago - January 2005 (in date order) There was a; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-01/msg00055.html (24,013 bytes)
10. Re: LF: AW: G3XIZ CQ 137.7 kHz (score: 1): Author: Chris Osborn <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 13:25:29 +0000 (UTC); Many thanks Hartmut for the excellent screen shot. I'll leave the beacon running with a DFCW test signal for a while longer. I'll go indoors and warm up as my garden brick-built shack is quite cold.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-01/msg00056.html (26,371 bytes)
11. Re: LF: AW: G3XIZ CQ 137.7 kHz (score: 1): Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 14:42:10 +0100; Chris. You are 599 here of course. As for activity, I think CW is much harder now because the noise floor in Europe from DCF and HGA is much greater than ten years ago. Plus local TVs, wall-warts etc; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-01/msg00058.html (16,166 bytes)
12. Re: LF: AW: G3XIZ CQ 137.7 kHz (score: 1): Author: Chris Osborn <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 13:45:58 +0000 (UTC); /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-01/msg00059.html (21,132 bytes)
13. Re: LF: AW: G3XIZ CQ 137.7 kHz (score: 1): Author: "G3WCB" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 15:15:14 +0100; Hi, Chris. I can still be QRV on 137 kHz at relatively short notice, but I seem to spend most of my operating time on 630m. 630m is a much easier band to get going on, especially with WSPR and Opera; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-01/msg00060.html (25,427 bytes)
14. Re: LF: AW: G3XIZ CQ 137.7 kHz (score: 1): Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 15:19:56 +0100; The beauty of Opera is that it is really easy to set up as it simply uses on-off keying. If you can run QRSS you can run Opera. Other digi modes can be useful but require additional complexity. It al; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-01/msg00061.html (18,361 bytes)
15. Re: LF: AW: G3XIZ CQ 137.7 kHz (score: 1): Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 15:16:25 +0100; Hi Chris, Mike, ... but it's a different kind of fun to have realtime two-way contacts instead of internet feedback. I would have loved to answer your CQ today. I like those faster QRSS / DFCW modes,; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-01/msg00062.html (17,864 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]