Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+8\.97kHz\s+NoV\s+received\s+today\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today (score: 1)
Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:04:51 +0100
Andy, Camborne is another lightning monitoring site. See http://www.intersites.co.uk/81765/index.html 73s Roger G3XBM On 22 October 2010 19:55, Andy Talbot <[email protected]> wrote: Of the f
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00065.html (14,833 bytes)

2. Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today (score: 1)
Author: gm4slv <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:29:15 +0100
Confused.... Wick is in Caithness, on the Scottish mainland near John O'Groats Lerwick is in Shetland (please...please...not "the Shetlands") Cheers, John GM4SLV
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00110.html (10,143 bytes)

3. RE: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 10:09:21 +0200
So you need permission to switch on a light??? 73 Victor --Oorspronkelijk bericht-- Van: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]Namens Alan Melia Verzonden: vri
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00120.html (11,485 bytes)

4. RE: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 10:07:56 +0200
Hello Alan, So under british regulations I did a lot of illegal experiments in the past HI.I don't know how the dutch telecom office thinks about this but I have a feeling they just don't want to be
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00130.html (12,104 bytes)

5. Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 19:08:41 +0100
James Is that you testing at present strong signal around 8.97 Kcs keying on/off testing de mal/g3kev -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] James Cowburn To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00195.html (21,900 bytes)

6. Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 19:55:31 +0100
Of the four exclusion zones, three are obvious,  presumably sferics receivers spread across the UK.   Exeter - the MO itself;   Eskdalemuir,  and   Wick in the Shetlands      are AFAIK normal monitor
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00216.html (13,384 bytes)

7. Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:14:19 +0100
No a good idea Jacek Ofcoms regulatory powers do not end at 9kHz. They have powers over radiation at any frequency. Alan G3NYK
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00226.html (12,634 bytes)

8. Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 23:38:19 +0100
True , but compared to the spread spectrum nonsense from over the water , ofcom seems to be quiet sane ! (always knew there was something fishy about 'ross') During the GB4FPR 500 nov , I has no prob
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00248.html (12,800 bytes)

9. Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 11:10:21 +0100
Victor I am on the East coast and just across the sea from Holland and most Dutch stns are audible with me on 137 and 500. The stn on 9 Kcs was on slow hand sent cw and is most likely to be PA but qs
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00277.html (16,034 bytes)

10. Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today (score: 1)
Author: "Jean-Pierre Méré (F1AFJ)" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 10:47:04 +0200
Hi Victor & all on VLF ! Good copy on JN06HT of Stefan/DK7FC See capture ( start at 08:00 utc ) 73 Jean-Pierre f1afj Le 23/10/2010 10:09, [email protected] a écrit : So you need permission to switch
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00353.html (12,632 bytes)

11. Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today (score: 1)
Author: "Jean-Pierre Méré (F1AFJ)" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 13:58:54 +0200
Hi all ! Last capture of Stefan ! in JN06HT ( approximately 690km ) Setup : Single turn loop ( 2m of dia ) Preamplifier HB 30dB ( push pul MMIC in "A" class ) no filter ! Souncard of laptop PC NB: I
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00425.html (13,117 bytes)

12. Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:54:23 +0100
John GM4SLV
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00429.html (12,472 bytes)

13. Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:24:10 +0100
Congrats on that Roger and 400 Hz wide ... ! G .. From: Roger Lapthorn Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 2:06 PM To: [email protected] ; G6ALB ; [email protected] Subject: LF: 8.97kHz NoV
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00462.html (13,637 bytes)

14. RE: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 11:35:23 +0200
Hello Mal, how are you so sure it's a PA0 station,any id? The radio spectrum is regulated from 9 KHz to (if I am correct) 300GHz.Maby some governments want to regulate outside these borders...Of cour
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00499.html (14,434 bytes)

15. Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:52:51 +0100
.... not a good idea , taken long enough as it is ! at least cannot blame Roger for a glitch in sub navigation ! *Frequencies allowed:* 8.7kHz - 9.1kHz i wonder what would happen if you applied speci
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00513.html (11,889 bytes)

16. Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 19:22:42 +0100
VLF Can anyone else see this carrier keying on/off maybe PA0 or a new nov g3kev -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] mal hamilton To: [email protected] rsgb_lf_group@blackshe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00541.html (23,562 bytes)

17. Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:45:04 +0200 (CEST)
*Frequencies allowed:* 8.7kHz - 9.1kHz i wonder what would happen if you applied specifically for 8.0-8.990kHz (no frequency >9kHz). is expanding the frequency range above 9kHz a trick by OFCOM, so
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00545.html (11,076 bytes)

18. Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 10:05:57 +0100
Victor I have already heard a PA0 stn on 9 Kcs a couple of weeks ago, weak signal on slow CW and last nite when I got into the shack in the evening there was a stn testing carrier on/off for short pe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00548.html (13,613 bytes)

19. RE: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today (score: 1)
Author: "James Cowburn" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 14:29:20 +0100
Hi All, Mine arrived to with the same T & Cs. Time to wind that coil and fire up the system. With best regards Jim Dr. James Cowburn G7NKS The information transmitted is intended only for the person
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00599.html (20,527 bytes)

20. Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:04:05 +0100
Andy But no restrictions across the channel where NOV'S are not needed and they can blast away QRO if desired, does'nt make sense. 10w erp would be more realistic in the UK on 9 Kcs g3kev -- Original
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00638.html (13,740 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu