Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+73kHz\s*$/: 43 ]

Total 43 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: 73kHz (score: 1)
Author: Roger Lapthorn <>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:59:51 +0100
Once you managed to radiate a signal, it would go a long way, with extended ground wave range compared to 136k, even with rather low ERP. Some QRSS transatlantic signals were received. I think 73kHz
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-10/msg00162.html (14,411 bytes)

2. Re: LF: 73kHz (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:08:46 +0100
The very first amateur use of QRSS (we used the term SLOWCW) : http://www.g4jnt.com/DownLoad/G4JNT008.BMP as received by G3PLX at a distance of 393km. My transmission, which was about 1mW ERP, was ge
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-10/msg00330.html (14,540 bytes)

3. Re: LF: 73kHz (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:34:08 +0100
Dear Stefan, LF Group, 73kHz reception was a problem in the UK because of an FSK utility located at Rugby in the middle of the band, which had strong noise sidebands that created QRM across the whole
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-10/msg00774.html (13,911 bytes)

4. LF: 73kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <>
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 1999 11:19:33 +0100
Sorry, I missed another 'first Tuesday' on 73kHz. This time my excuse is high winds which caused me to lower the antenna, and torrential rain which stopped me raising and re-tuning it. On the positiv
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-03/msg00017.html (8,358 bytes)

5. LF: 73kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <>
Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 01:34:05 -0400
From Dave G3YMC It seems Rugby (60kHz) has started its annual maintenance program and is off the air every day during daylight (including weekends) for the whole of May. The 73kHz RTTY also seems to
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-05/msg00010.html (8,073 bytes)

6. Re: LF: 73kHz (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Fri, 7 May 1999 07:19:35 EDT
<< From Dave G3YMC It seems Rugby (60kHz) has started its annual maintenance program and is off the air every day during daylight (including weekends) for the whole of May. The 73kHz RTTY also seems
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-05/msg00023.html (8,173 bytes)

7. Re: LF: 73kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <>
Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 01:34:03 -0400
From Dave G3YMC <It seems Rugby (60kHz) has started its annual maintenance program and is < off the air every day during daylight (including weekends) for the whole of < May. The 73kHz RTTY also seem
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-05/msg00044.html (8,274 bytes)

8. LF: 73kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 15:18:13 +0100
A couple of tests on 73kHz have flagged up a possible problem on ther band. I transmitted for some of the evening of Monday 4 Oct on 71.91kHz but was not audible with G3YXM. I also listened for Dave'
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-10/msg00035.html (9,179 bytes)

9. LF: 73kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Prof R. Jennison" <>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 18:15:49 -0400
Mike and Peter, I did not hear either of you but I then put my own beacon on in the hope that I might be heard on normal cw. I will try again tomorrow but I have had no reception reports, and have he
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-10/msg00036.html (7,680 bytes)

10. LF: 73kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 08:39:38 +0100
From Dave G3YMC Friday night was activity night on 73kHz, with more stations on the band at the same time than I have ever known! Rugby was transmitting a different sort of data and the sideband nois
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00138.html (8,218 bytes)

11. Re: LF: 73kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 16:42:10 +0000
From Dave G3YMC Friday night was activity night on 73kHz, with more stations on the band at the same time than I have ever known! Rugby was transmitting a different sort of data and the sideband nois
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00143.html (9,040 bytes)

12. LF: 73kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <>
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2000 22:22:29 +0100
Dear all, Just a reminder. If Rugby Radio runs true to form, the 73.3kHz tx and all its lovely sidebands will be off for maintenance on Tuesday. It being the first Tuesday in February. If anyone is i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00353.html (7,858 bytes)

13. LF: 73kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Dodd" <>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 10:26:52 GMT
from James Moritz Spent a couple of hours on 73kHz on Friday evening; didn't see/hear any other signals - Rugby TX was generating it's usual racket. However, the effort was worth it because my signal
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-03/msg00019.html (8,549 bytes)

14. LF: 73kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 19:35:53 +0100
Dear all. It was so embarrassing to see my drifting VFO on Markus' plots that I have connected the DDS to my 73k TX and it seems to work OK. I will try some calls around 2000 tonight (Monday) and fro
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-03/msg00068.html (8,118 bytes)

15. LF: 73kHz (score: 1)
Author: "'Geri' Kinzel, DK8KW" <>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 16:03:06 -0500
Dave, G3YXM, It was so embarrassing to see my drifting VFO on Markus' plots that I have connected the DDS to my 73k TX and it seems to work OK indeed, it did! Have a look at www.qru.de/g3yxm.htm, las
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-03/msg00069.html (8,675 bytes)

16. LF: 73kHz (score: 1)
Author: "'Geri' Kinzel, DK8KW" <>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 17:28:08 -0500
Hello friends, and saw also another station calling on 71.833 kHz (M0BMU?). Did not answer on 137 kHz, because signal was barely "T" that was a little bit preliminary ... just worked M0BMU crossband,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-03/msg00073.html (8,260 bytes)

17. LF: 73kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2000 16:24:26 +0100
I was on 73kHz last night and again this morning, but seem to have been beaten to the DX by M0BMU and G3YXM. I will be active again on the band, looking for crossband QSOs on Saturday and Sunday morn
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-03/msg00085.html (8,325 bytes)

18. LF: 73kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 16:37:37 +0100
I will be using QRSs on 71.80kHz this evening (17 March) and early tomorrow morning, looking for crossband QSOs with 137.7kHz, or e-mail reports. 73 Mike, G3XDV (IO91VT) http://www.dennison.demon.co.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-03/msg00163.html (8,051 bytes)

19. LF: 73kHz (score: 1)
Author: "mike.dennison" <>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 16:44:31 +0100
I will be on 71.605kHz QRSS this evening. I will check the 73k band, then 137.7kHz for replies. Mike, G3XDV
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00180.html (7,495 bytes)

20. LF: 73kHz (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:01:39 +0000
Dear John, Laurie, Mal & LF group, I have not been active on 73kHz just lately because I am in the throes of completing a new PA for this band. However, this is now looking promising, and I hope to b
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00209.html (8,719 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu