Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+73\s+Khz\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

1. LF: 73 khz (score: 1)
Author: "mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:04:01 +0100
Does anyone know if 73 khz is being used since radio amateurs vacated it a few years ago. 73 mal/g3kev
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-03/msg00140.html (7,438 bytes)

2. LF: 73 Khz (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:07:00 +0100
I still have my 73 Khz NOV although expired, and could be active within a couple of hours if it was renewed. The problem at present is not enough occupancy on the existing LF/MF bands, another alloca
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00813.html (8,445 bytes)

3. LF: 73 kHz (score: 1)
Author: "john sexton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 01:47:59 -0800 (PST)
Listened to the QSOs on 71.8 kHz at 20.30 last night 14.1.2000. Heard the following QSOs in the first half hour: M0BMU 4,4,9 G0MRF 5,5,9 M0BMU 4,4,9 G3XTZ 5,6,9 G0MRF 5,5,9 G3XDV 3,3,9 The band seeme
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00139.html (7,897 bytes)

4. LF: 73 khz (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 18:58:28 +0000
The band is very quiet here and the Rugby tx although strong does not have the whiskers that those in the Midlands and South suffer from. I just tune across it at times to see what is going on but am
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-03/msg00024.html (8,218 bytes)

5. LF: 73 Khz (score: 1)
Author: "Valerio" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 17:39:10 +0100
Hello folks, Now i'm able to receive on 73 kHz band, so i'm available for sked about rx or xband (73/136) qso. Please tell me about frequency and time, i will be in the shack starting from this eveni
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-03/msg00063.html (7,695 bytes)

6. LF: 73 kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Rollema" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 09:56:11 +0100
To All from PA0SE Having recently installed Spectogram I gave it a try on 73 kHz this morning. It works perfectly and I saw several G-stations. But I also copied them by ear! Reports by ear are: G3XT
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-03/msg00076.html (9,423 bytes)

7. LF: 73 KHz (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Boucher" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2000 13:19:34 +0100
Super signals this morning, Saturday, on 72 KHz with my VLW lying on the ground as a result of an ice storm last week. Aural reports in 500 Hz B/W: Dave 589 - the strongest signal I've ever heard on
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00093.html (7,662 bytes)

8. LF: 73 khz (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 08:38:38 +0000
Hi All Maybe it is time to concentrate on 73 khz since we only have a couple of years left to experiment and break some distance records!!!! Too much time has been wasted on the transatlantic attempt
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00016.html (8,281 bytes)

9. LF: 73 khz (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 19:10:56 +0000
For those suitably equipped on 73 khz with a better than average antenna and able to generate 1w erp there is a possibility that they might be seen on slow cw or wobble mode across in W/VE. Long befo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00252.html (8,628 bytes)

10. LF: 73 kHz (score: 1)
Author: "John Currie" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 12:20:07 -0400
Hi Jim we will be at cottage this weekend no LF there yet. Can,t look for you on weekend. Should have LF receive capability there by next weekend 73 de John VE1ZJ
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00077.html (7,489 bytes)

11. LF: 73 khz (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 08:47:25 +0100
Hi All I am not surprised that Laurie has been seen/heard on 73 khz in VE1. I said in a message some months ago that 73 khz was suitable for a transatlantic qso, under normal to good propagation cond
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00227.html (8,964 bytes)

12. LF: 73 kHz (score: 1)
Author: "John Currie" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 01:59:25 -0700
Hi Laurie es Peter. I watched the screen caerfully last night . Sorry , Peter , I didn't knoe you were on. I will always be using 30 sec dots . That will restrict my receive window. Last night i was
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00278.html (8,413 bytes)

13. LF: 73 kHz (score: 1)
Author: "John Currie" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2001 20:29:59 -0400
Hi Jim es Laurie. Am having some trouble getting set up at cottage. Won't have lf set up for week 73 de John VE1ZJ
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-07/msg00233.html (7,377 bytes)

14. LF: 73 khz (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 19:16:22 +0100
Is it worth putting out a signal on 73 khz at present since the band activity seems to be nil. If anyone interested let me know. de Mal/G3KEV/SCARBOROUGH
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00257.html (7,657 bytes)

15. LF: 73 Khz (score: 1)
Author: "Nan and Sandy Sanders" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 11:33:52 -0500
Just checked last nights ARGO captures no luck. John there may be something to the Hoover theory. Sandy WB5MMB
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00153.html (7,564 bytes)

16. LF: 73 kHz (score: 1)
Author: "john currie" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 20:40:06 -0500
Congratulations to John es Laurie. Last night had severe 60 troubles. Saw nil Laurie I can change receive freq in about 60 sec so no trouble to monitor 136 es 73 bands. A problem though the version o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00217.html (7,798 bytes)

17. LF: 73 kHz (score: 1)
Author: "John Currie" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 12:58:16 -0400
Hi Looked last night saw nil 73 de John VE1ZJ
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-12/msg00482.html (7,328 bytes)

18. LF: 73 khz (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 12:18:23 +0000
Hi Laurie G3AQC and Co I heard you this morning on 71.7 khz but due to a computer smpu was unable to copy properly, about 459 at one stage but your signal also had qsb. My loop is positioned EW there
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-03/msg00142.html (8,820 bytes)

19. LF: 73 khz (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 09:06:50 +0000
If anyone would like to TX on 73 khz over the weekend I will listen and work xband 136 khz. I want to try the loop out on 73 khz. I have built an atu that resonates the loop both on 136 and 73 khz. I
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-03/msg00158.html (8,334 bytes)

20. LF: 73 khz (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 18:44:08 +0000
I occassionally listen on 73 khz and never hear a soul. Is there anyone still active on the band. At this QTH the band is noise free, no loran etc, the same at my GI QTH, far away from the South coas
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-03/msg00161.html (9,240 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu