Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+630m\s+JT9\-2\s+last\s+night\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+630m\s+JT9\-2\s+last\s+night\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: 630m JT9-2 last night (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 06:56:40 -0500; Below is my list of JT9-2 decodes from last night. I think we had a good amount of participation in the test. The only concern I have is that there were very few decodes below -27 or "standard JT9" l; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00259.html (17,394 bytes)
2. Re: LF: 630m JT9-2 last night (score: 1): Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 07:29:44 -0500; Paul John, W1TAG and I found a good way to evaluate software was to run controlled testing between our two stations. The transmit end was configured to easily change power in 1 dB steps so that accur; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00260.html (15,901 bytes)
3. Re: LF: 630m JT9-2 last night (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 08:58:02 -0500; Thanks Jay, That sounds like a very good approach. I will see if I can find someone within daytime range who has accurate power control and is interested in doing that. It is not easy for me to adjus; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00265.html (13,595 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]