Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+500khz\s+rtty\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: 500khz rtty (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:06:16 +0200
Mal, I am well aware of your large antenna and superb location. But the nice thing about an ERP limit (at least for those with more humble antennas and locations, including me) is that one can compen
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00010.html (15,229 bytes)

2. LF: 500khz rtty (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:35:02 +0100
Rtty transmissin covering 503 - 505 khz ie 2 khz wide and outside the top of he permitted band. Active at present 1430 utc/23/8/08 de G3KEV
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00017.html (8,723 bytes)

3. Re: LF: 500khz rtty (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 20:06:00 +0100
Buy a QTH like mine and find out first hand. I have maximum advantage with the permitted power How do you verify your ERP? Your NoV application must have included some indication of how you would do
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00028.html (12,224 bytes)

4. Re: LF: 500khz rtty (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 18:14:23 +0100
I thought that would be the response from you. Why no ID? I will let OFCOM decide if necessary G3KEV -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Graham To: [email protected] rsgb_
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00042.html (12,080 bytes)

5. Re: LF: 500khz rtty (score: 1)
Author: John Pumford-Green <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:40:46 +0100
How do you verify your ERP? Your NoV application must have included some indication of how you would do it. How do you ensure your TX power is not excessive, given the self proclaimed superior locati
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00058.html (11,492 bytes)

6. Re: LF: 500khz rtty (score: 1)
Author: "Steve McDonald" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:34:40 -0700
Looks to me like Mal's been busted.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00079.html (10,447 bytes)

7. Re: LF: 500khz rtty (score: 1)
Author: John Pumford-Green <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 20:33:20 +0100
The standard of technically sophisticated discussion we've come to expect from the self-proclaimed maestro of the LF world. That was certainly worth waiting for. Well done.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00085.html (10,722 bytes)

8. Re: LF: 500khz rtty (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 20:18:16 +0100
ANYTIME . If you saw the fet in my PA you would'nt bother. G3KEV I thought that would be the response from you. Why no ID? I will let OFCOM decide if necessary G3KEV Perhaps we could ask them to chec
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00135.html (10,546 bytes)

9. Re: LF: 500khz rtty (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 17:32:07 +0100
Don't see that on the two on line plots or at this qth, must be a image. That's a problem with single conversion rx's when they are working near the IF frequency or a bit of mains hum on the local os
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00147.html (10,649 bytes)

10. Re: LF: 500khz rtty (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:57:54 -0400
Mmmmmm! I do believe I hear the words "Hoist" and "Petard" coming through the noise! 73 de Pat g4gvw QTH Near FELIXSTOWE, UK Thought for today: What politicians do for science, hopefully science will
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00168.html (11,471 bytes)

11. Re: LF: 500khz rtty (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 23:33:53 +0200
Based on the antenna description given by Mal ("1/4 wave inv L for 500 khz, 100 ft vertical and rest horizontal") simulation reveals a radiation resistance of 5 Ohm and a directivity of 1.5 dBd. This
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00229.html (12,550 bytes)

12. Re: LF: 500khz rtty (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 23:15:09 +0100
Yes I think that's a fair comment , I did see a little signal wobbling around the centre of the band this afternoon , Bit chirpy, bit click'ey Watching it swim across spec-lab reminded me a bit of a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00232.html (11,755 bytes)

13. Re: LF: 500khz rtty (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:15:10 +0100
Rik My advantage is Location. I am only 2 miles from the sea to the East across countryside, to my south there is a river, which probably helps and I am sorrounded by thousands of hectares of green f
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00245.html (14,064 bytes)

14. Re: LF: 500khz rtty (score: 1)
Author: John Pumford-Green GM4SLV <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:39:46 +0100
Perhaps we could ask them to check your ERP at the same time?
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00299.html (9,792 bytes)

15. LF: 500khz RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 18:20:39 +0100
Hi Chris, LF, Just had the best ever copy of your RTTY, started about 1708utc. The few errors were due to static crashes not QSB. Gary &#8211; G4WGT. TrueTTY V2.75 (c) 1999-2008 Sergei Podstrigailo,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-11/msg00371.html (28,359 bytes)

16. Re: LF: 500kHz RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 23:12:54 +0100
Hello Gary, I am a bit fuzzed why the CQ call in CW had to be 200Hz from the frequency you and Gary were on. There was plenty of free space up and down the band. A bit later the CW caller got a reply
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-12/msg00293.html (11,952 bytes)

17. Re: LF: 500kHz RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Gary - G4WGT <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 21:38:05 +0000
Hi Rik, Thanks for your report & comments. I enjoyed the QSO with Graham, I could also hear the CW you mention. Cheers, Gary - G4WGT. 2009/12/5 Rik Strobbe <[email protected]> Gary, Grahem,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-12/msg00535.html (11,929 bytes)

18. LF: 500kHz RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 21:47:37 +0100
Gary, Grahem, I followed your RTTY QSO (+/- 20:40 UTC) with almost perfect copy from both station. Even after a CW station started calling CQ about 200Hz up copy was still good. RTTY 45dB/85Hz seems
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-12/msg00550.html (10,277 bytes)

19. Re: LF: 500kHz RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 22:29:24 +0100
Ok Rik , Thanks for the report , Yes I did notice ,'Dotty Boy' had jumped frequency at one time I thought the vfo was rusted solid, mid band , a wise choice to prevent out of band tx when it jumps an
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-12/msg00656.html (11,190 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu