Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+473\.000\s+G3XIZ\s+CW\s+BEACON\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. LF: 473.000 G3XIZ CW BEACON (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 14:04:20 +0100
473.000 G3XIZ CW BEACON 555 IO83LK 73-G Virus-free. www.avast.com
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00129.html (8,981 bytes)

2. Re: LF: 473.000 G3XIZ CW BEACON (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 14:22:57 +0100 (CET)
473.000 G3XIZ  CW  BEACON bad choice frequency, BIA is at 474kHz, and has sidebands on 473 and 475 VY 73 Jacek / SQ5BPF
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00130.html (8,871 bytes)

3. Re: LF: 473.000 G3XIZ CW BEACON (score: 1)
Author: Chris Osborn <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 19:29:01 +0000
OK Jacek OM, I was actually on 473.200 kHz It was well away from the calling channel and seemed a clear frequency (from here). 73 Chris  / G3XIZ On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Jacek Lipkowski <sq5b
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00134.html (10,220 bytes)

4. Re: LF: 473.000 G3XIZ CW BEACON (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 15:42:07 +0100
Chris , I can blame that on the icom . thats where the cw auto net stopped stopped ... bands just end to end with nose , shows S9 on the s-meter day time propagation is quite good , but rx is marred
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00137.html (11,470 bytes)

5. Re: LF: 473.000 G3XIZ CW BEACON (score: 1)
Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 16:10:52 +0000 (UTC)
I blame the Spectrum Police........ never thought it would infect 630m it has infected 136 though as I can testify. V/UHF is more infected than most bits of spectrum. Spare us. Pete fmt. Subject: Re:
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00138.html (10,158 bytes)

6. Re: LF: 473.000 G3XIZ CW BEACON (score: 1)
Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 16:17:29 +0000
I blame the Spectrum Police........ never thought it would infect 630m it has infected 136 though as I can testify. V/UHF is more infected than most bits of spectrum. Spare us. Pete fmt.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00139.html (8,902 bytes)

7. RE: LF: 473.000 G3XIZ CW BEACON (score: 1)
Author: James Cowburn <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 17:01:24 +0000
indeed!!
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00140.html (10,528 bytes)

8. Re: LF: 473.000 G3XIZ CW BEACON (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 18:57:41 +0100 (CET)
I blame the Spectrum Police........ never thought it would infect 630m it has infected 136 though as I can testify. i'm no spectrum police. what i meant is that if someone transmits around BIA: 473,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00141.html (9,280 bytes)

9. Re: LF: 473.000 G3XIZ CW BEACON (score: 1)
Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 12:51:03 +0000
Aaaar Right Sorry ......... good point.   73 Petefmt   --    Subject: Re: LF: 473.000 G3XIZ CW BEACON  To: [email protected]  Date: Sunday, 19 March, 2017, 17:57    On Sun, 19 Mar 2017,  M
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00143.html (17,237 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu