Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+33\s+Hz\s+QRM\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. LF: 33 Hz QRM (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 03:42:43 -0400
Occasionally I'm getting a new kind of interference with strong 33 Hz spaced lines all over the LF band. Variable RDF colour indicates that it could be emitted from power converters on moving railway
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-03/msg00224.html (11,306 bytes)

2. Re: LF: 33 Hz QRM (score: 1)
Author: John Rabson <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 15:56:00 +0100
I seem to recall that some railway systems use at about 16 2/3 Hz (one third of 50 Hz) for traction. Historically, some systems used about 33 Hz. I read somewhere that on-board power converters on so
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-03/msg00236.html (12,069 bytes)

3. Re: LF: 33 Hz QRM (score: 1)
Author: Johan Bodin <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:21:04 +0100
Railway QRG is 16 2/3 Hz in Sweden too. 73 de Johan SM6LKM John Rabson wrote: I seem to recall that some railway systems use at about 16 2/3 Hz (one third of 50 Hz) for traction. ... Can someone say
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-03/msg00242.html (10,917 bytes)

4. Re: LF: 33 Hz QRM (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:18:27 +0000
Is that to minimise skin loss in steel track ? UK Third rail is, of course, DC, and I once spent an idle moment calculating the loss if 50Hz AC were to be used with magnetic iron conductors.  I think
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-03/msg00243.html (12,587 bytes)

5. Re: LF: 33 Hz QRM (score: 1)
Author: David Hine <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:52:12 +0000 (UTC)
Hi, 16 2/3 Hz was used as it enables the older brush motors to have much less losses than if they were run at 50 Hz -they would behave much more as if DC was applied (easier to handle). However 50 Hz
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-03/msg00244.html (15,076 bytes)

6. Re: LF: 33 Hz QRM (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:59:11 +0000
Hello John, Johan, LF 16 2/3 Hz should probably be 16 1/3 Hz, one third of 50 Hz as John pointed out. Here in OH-land we use 50 Hz for the railways but during my EE studies, the SM-land railway QRG w
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-03/msg00245.html (13,278 bytes)

7. Re: LF: 33 Hz QRM (score: 1)
Author: PA7EY <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:37:44 +0100
I suppose 16 2/3 is correct (16 1/3 x 3 = 49), according to my information, they actually use 16.7 in some places these days. 73 Ulrich PA7EY 2016-03-17 15:59 GMT+01:00 <[email protected]>: Hello John,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-03/msg00246.html (14,613 bytes)

8. Re: LF: 33 Hz QRM (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 20:53:14 +0100
The 16 2/3 Hz trace is visible on my VLF remote grabber at http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber2.html About 35 dB SNR in 3.8 mHz, to be improved. Although the voltage for t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-03/msg00261.html (15,304 bytes)

9. Re: LF: 33 Hz QRM (score: 1)
Author: Johan Bodin <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 09:11:20 +0200
That problem can be solved by using a return line and booster transformers that minimises current leakage into surrounding earth: https://library.e.abb.com/public/f1200714de5086c585257d7300287357/1LF
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-03/msg00365.html (13,459 bytes)

10. Re: LF: 33 Hz QRM (score: 1)
Author: David Hine <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:19:01 +0000 (UTC)
Hi, A very interesting article. The London Underground (Metro) uses a low voltage 4 rail DC system. The 2 'live rails are balanced + and - with regard to the running rails. This system is a 'throw-ba
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-03/msg00366.html (16,782 bytes)

11. Re: LF: 33 Hz QRM (score: 1)
Author: John Rabson <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 11:33:05 +0200
Johan, Many thanks for the reference. I now understand much better how these things are arranged. 73 John F5VLF [email protected] Researching history of RABSON, BLACKSHAW, GAUNTLETT, VERLANDER
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-03/msg00386.html (13,465 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu