Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+20\:50\s+136\s+PA0OCD\s+de\s+F6CNI\s+Op32\s+\-34\s+dB\s+F\:11\%\s+in\s+JN37KW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+20\:50\s+136\s+PA0OCD\s+de\s+F6CNI\s+Op32\s+\-34\s+dB\s+F\:11\%\s+in\s+JN37KW\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: 20:50 136 PA0OCD de F6CNI Op32 -34 dB F:11% in JN37KW (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 22:22:47 +0100; PA0OCD 50w + 6m Vert+Tophat 6x 1.2m That would be a compact array on Top band ! 73-G, 21:12 136 G3XDV de F6CNI Op32 -22 dB F:1% in JN37KW 21:12 136 G3XDV de PA0OCD Op32 222 mi -22 dB F:35%_Ini in Die; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-08/msg00028.html (8,893 bytes)
2. Re: LF: 20:50 136 PA0OCD de F6CNI Op32 -34 dB F:11% in JN37KW (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 01:24:05 +0100; All decodes, G, 00:12 136 G3XDV de G0NBD Op32 163 mi -23 dB F:9% in 1532.8 Hz with ERP0.4w + inv-L 00:12 136 G3XDV de F6CNI Op32 -24 dB F:0% in JN37KW 00:12 136 G3XDV de PA0OCD Op32 222 mi -23 dB F:0; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-08/msg00029.html (10,715 bytes)
3. LF: 20:50 136 PA0OCD de F6CNI Op32 -34 dB F:11% in JN37KW (score: 1): Author: "F6CNI - Andy - JN19QB" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 09:56:07 +0200; HI all. Yes, the PA0OCD antenna is very short, but really effective on the 2200m band ! I just computed his antenna using EZNEC + V5.0 and strandar average ground and losses (soil resistance, Q of th; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-08/msg00030.html (13,196 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]