Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+1476\s+kHz\s+AM\s*$/: 37 ]

Total 37 documents matching your query.

21. Re: LF: 1476 kHz AM (score: 1)
Author: Marcus PY3CRX PY2PLL <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 10:33:09 -0200
Hi Stepan ... Good idea this FSK pattern applied to the carrier freq. This remind me several years ago at 13.55MHz or so, a segment called HiFer (there was lowfer/medfer too) ... was funny detect NA
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00150.html (37,459 bytes)

22. RE: LF: 1476 kHz AM (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 15:59:09 +0100
The carrier is right now audible and visible on a battery powered portable SDR (Reuter Pocket) with just a small active ferrite antenna. 73 Clemens DL4RAJ
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00152.html (11,116 bytes)

23. Re: LF: 1476 kHz AM (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 15:54:23 +0000 (UTC)
Many thanks again also to Rik, Ian, Stefan, Mauro, Ewald for your fine observations and suggestions, both on behalf of Ralph and from myself. I can say that we are overwhelmed by the number of positi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00155.html (11,228 bytes)

24. Re: LF: 1476 kHz AM (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 16:33:24 +0000 (UTC)
Hi Marcus, this is really exiting! Up to now, the only proof is the +0.411 Hz offset of Ralph's carrier frequency. Given receiver uncertainties, we can currently only reference it to the swinging-the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00156.html (33,350 bytes)

25. Re: LF: 1476 kHz AM (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 16:37:44 +0000
&#8203;&#8203;Hello Markus, FSKing the carrier a few Hz would be easy to implement and easy to detect. One option would be DFCW another would be WSPR. For both you would need no more than arduino boa
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00158.html (12,230 bytes)

26. Re: LF: 1476 kHz AM (score: 1)
Author: Laurence KL7 L <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 20:47:47 +0000
Morning from Alaska - I was a little late in shoving the North bound beam over the pole and taking a look at 1476kHz - We have numerous co-channel stations on Oz, China, Indonesia and Russia and I tr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00177.html (16,938 bytes)

27. Re: LF: 1476 kHz AM (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 21:40:44 +0000 (UTC)
Thanks Laurence - another long shot ;-) How accurate is your frequency readout? Seems like MW broadcasters are hardly ever exactly on frequency. The "thermostat swinger" came in up about 1 Hz low in
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00180.html (17,465 bytes)

28. Re: LF: 1476 kHz AM (score: 1)
Author: Laurence KL7 L <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 22:03:56 +0000
Hi Makus - Its refd to GPS so pretty close... I put on the HP3336B and checked against two gps disciplined 10MHz refs and both came up the same. The LF carrier one is quite a "noisy" swing - so maybe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00181.html (13,430 bytes)

29. Re: LF: 1476 kHz AM (score: 1)
Author: Marcus PY3CRX PY2PLL <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 20:37:42 -0200
hI ... The thermostat swinger is "strong" in a Vietnam KiWi SDR Propagation not ok tonight, no signal from this "reference" here now ... I have 3 carriers detected, all stable and close to center fre
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00182.html (33,039 bytes)

30. Re: LF: 1476 kHz AM (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 23:11:01 +0000 (UTC)
Hi Marcus, yes a GPS 1 Hz comb would surely help. Iran is currently moving between +259.2 and 259.5 Hz, and might be useful to identify the right 1 Hz harmonic. The "swinger" stopped oscillating afte
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00183.html (32,303 bytes)

31. Re: LF: 1476 kHz AM (score: 1)
Author: Riccardo Zoli <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 00:22:56 +0100
Hello Markus, FSKing the carrier a few Hz would be easy to implement and easy to detect. One option would be DFCW another would be WSPR. For both you would need no more than arduino board (or someth
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00184.html (14,836 bytes)

32. Re: LF: 1476 kHz AM (score: 1)
Author: Marcus PY3CRX PY2PLL <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 22:07:38 -0200
Hi Markus Well the time I logged in to this RX the map still showing the RX was in the dark area. May be I express myself in a wrong way, I meant that at this receiver an erractic carrier was stronge
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00185.html (41,277 bytes)

33. Re: LF: 1476 kHz AM (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 01:02:20 +0000 (UTC)
Marcus, thanks for the uploads. The strong carrier seems to be the drifting one which used to be the swinger, and it is also visible around Ralph's line on http://df6nm.darc.de/mf/1476kHz.jpg . In yo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00187.html (38,835 bytes)

34. Re: LF: 1476 kHz AM (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 01:06:48 +0000 (UTC)
PS: Argo "QRSS 90 slow" may be even better. 73, Markus --Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-- Von: Markus Vester <[email protected]> An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> Verschickt: So, 11. Nov.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00188.html (39,400 bytes)

35. Re: LF: 1476 kHz AM (score: 1)
Author: Marcus PY3CRX PY2PLL <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 00:03:37 -0200
OK, may be the version I'm using have only 30/60/120 so I set it to 120 normal, 10 minute ticks. Now 1:45 UTC ... the "sw inger" seems to vary across Ralph's line. The link to 1476.jpg on your site i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00189.html (10,223 bytes)

36. Re: LF: 1476 kHz AM (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 10:43:28 +0000 (UTC)
Hi Marcus, yes http://df6nm.darc.de/mf/1476kHz.jpg should have auto-updated every hour, except that unfortunately my PC stalled shortly after 4 UT. The slow Argo is helpful. Comparing your 4:34 UT sc
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00192.html (12,209 bytes)

37. Re: LF: 1476 kHz AM (score: 1)
Author: Marcus PY3CRX PY2PLL <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 10:41:27 -0200
Hi Markus ... Yes, I'll try next days assuming that the TX will be on using 1Kz on/off pattern or even with regular modulation relay as explained before. But don't worry abt a paralell harness to hel
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00194.html (16,028 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu