Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+136kHz\s+receivers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+136kHz\s+receivers\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: 136kHz receivers (score: 1): Author: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 13:16:38; I can confirm Mike's (G3XDV) conclusion that even a simple attenuator can improve the receiving condidtions a lot. Some months ago I took advantage of a slow-CW transmission of G3XDV (with his old VF; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-09/msg00122.html (8,403 bytes)
2. LF: 136kHz receivers (score: 1): Author: "M. Bruno" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 22:01:50 +0100; Hi all, I agree with Toni observing that a 500 Hz filter is too wide for serious weak signal work. I use a Racal 1792, modified with 300 Hz and 100 Hz filters, followed by an audio (analogic) filter.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-09/msg00125.html (8,641 bytes)
3. Re: LF: 136kHz receivers (score: 1): Author: Väinö Lehtoranta <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 15:24:41 +0300; The art of listening (band monitoring), Earlier this week I was almost sorry that I once again triggered the discussion about receivers and listening strategies. I did so because AR-7030 Plus - sort; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-09/msg00129.html (11,262 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]