Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+0\.003\s+Hz\s+drift\s+DJ8WX\s+at\s+8970\,022\s+Hz\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. RE: LF: 0.003 Hz drift DJ8WX at 8970,022 Hz (score: 1)
Author: Laurence KL1 X <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 10:41:19 -0900
Thanks Wolf - Ive been itching to ask that question for some time! Laurence > Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 20:27:29 +0100 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: LF: 0.00
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00007.html (12,237 bytes)

2. Re: LF: 0.003 Hz drift DJ8WX at 8970,022 Hz (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 16:42:45 +0100
Am 02.02.2013 11:55, schrieb PA1SDB, Peter: [...] It learns us again that a stable signal is very- very- veryyyyy importand. Hi Peter, Yes, even veryyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00010.html (10,942 bytes)

3. Re: LF: 0.003 Hz drift DJ8WX at 8970,022 Hz (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 11:10:39 +0100
No, Peter, my control capture shows the same. Sri for that. Seems the GPS ant got wet. I have to find out. GL Uwe/dj8wx Von: [email protected] Gesendet: 02.02.2013 09:52 An: rsgb_lf_group@
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00122.html (10,680 bytes)

4. RE: LF: 0.003 Hz drift DJ8WX at 8970,022 Hz (score: 1)
Author: Laurence KL1 X <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 09:29:24 -0900
Uwe, Peter and other VLFers - I ve shoved the very slow 8970 on the following snappers. http://kl7uk.com/VLFAlaska.html VLF only http://kl7uk.com/Alaska.html MF LF HF and VLF dependant on my viewing/
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00172.html (15,675 bytes)

5. Re: LF: 0.003 Hz drift DJ8WX at 8970,022 Hz (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 12:12:25 +0100
Also worth noting that the drifting signal equally appeared at OK2BVG and (weakly) at DK7FC, a nice confirmation! Best 73, Markus (DF6NM) From: [email protected] PA1SDB, Peter Sent: Saturday, February
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00174.html (15,182 bytes)

6. RE: LF: 0.003 Hz drift DJ8WX at 8970,022 Hz (score: 1)
Author: Laurence KL1 X <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 13:41:57 -0900
Yep your right Uwe - we had good reception of Eu on MF and LF and some success at VLF too:-) but this location in respect to geo mag latitude and local topography has a lot more challenges than the f
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00313.html (13,271 bytes)

7. Re: LF: 0.003 Hz drift DJ8WX at 8970,022 Hz (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 16:14:01 +0000
What Very Yes, even veryyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Sounds like Gilbert and Sullivan.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00471.html (11,587 bytes)

8. Re: LF: 0.003 Hz drift DJ8WX at 8970,022 Hz (score: 1)
Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 11:57:35 +0100
O.K. thanks for info Uwe. You don't have to say sorry :-) It learns us again that a stable signal is very- veryveryyyyy importand. My 424 uHz grabber shows your signal and drift clear with connected
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00562.html (13,546 bytes)

9. LF: 0.003 Hz drift DJ8WX at 8970,022 Hz (score: 1)
Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 10:55:05 +0100
Hello Uwe, I'm not sure, but it looks like your generator is not rock stable anymore since 19h45 UTC yesterday (1 Feb 13) It did drift down about 0.003 Hz. (Ha ha.... 0.003 Hz) Also possible that the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00606.html (10,140 bytes)

10. Re: LF: 0.003 Hz drift DJ8WX at 8970,022 Hz (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 20:27:29 +0100
Hi Laurence and all, You asked: Is it better to have a longer FFT input size and smaller decimate or say smaller input size and larger decimate :-) ? < It doesn't matter for this application. Importa
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00727.html (11,464 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu