Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+\[500\s+kHz\]\s+DI2BO\s+has\s+1\.7\s+mW\s+ERP\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+\[500\s+kHz\]\s+DI2BO\s+has\s+1\.7\s+mW\s+ERP\!\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: [500 kHz] DI2BO has 1.7 mW ERP! (score: 1): Author: "Jose Manuel" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 00:30:37 +0200; Hello Jim and Group, You have mentioned around 0.02uV/m, at the equivalent noise BW of 3sec ARGO, for the noise field strength in your location during daytime, can you tell me what level do you have; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-04/msg00004.html (13,289 bytes)
2. Re: LF: [500 kHz] DI2BO has 1.7 mW ERP! (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 20:12:12 +0100; Dear Dave, LF Group, Not neccesarily - assuming a distance between you and DI2BO of around 700km, an ERP of 1.7mW in a straight line in free space gives a field strength at your antenna of about 0.4u; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-04/msg00005.html (12,559 bytes)
3. Re: LF: [500 kHz] DI2BO has 1.7 mW ERP! (score: 1): Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 13:29:00 +0100; Thanks for the update Geri, it perhaps shows that all the magic formulas we are using to estimate our ERP are somewhat wide of the mark. It also gives me some comfort that my vertical, estimated to h; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-04/msg00006.html (14,724 bytes)
4. LF: [500 kHz] DI2BO has 1.7 mW ERP! (score: 1): Author: "Holger 'Geri', DK8KW" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 02:26:56 +0200; Hello Dave and also all the others observing DI2BO (and the other beacons on 500 kHz), Today the weather was fine and I took the chance to drive around and do some ERP field-measurements. Technically; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-04/msg00007.html (14,982 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]