Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*AW\:\s+Re\:\s+VLF\:\s+8270\:\s+now\s+8269\.990Hz\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. AW: Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 13:04:29 +0200
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-04/msg00005.html (17,605 bytes)

2. Re: AW: Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 11:51:00 +0000
Good luck with that Uwe. For 2 char messages with 16 bit CRC, the max useful list length is probably around 1k but I don't yet know where the optimum is. Beyond a certain length (corresponding to nea
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-04/msg00007.html (10,342 bytes)

3. AW: Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 18:38:49 +0200
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-04/msg00019.html (19,624 bytes)

4. Re: AW: Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 20:51:27 +0000
Decoded well here, Eb/N0 = +7.3dB with constant reference phase. -- Paul Nicholson --
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-04/msg00024.html (10,114 bytes)

5. AW: Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2016 12:46:54 +0200
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-04/msg00032.html (20,632 bytes)

6. Re: AW: Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2016 12:39:39 +0000
Your signal gets better with each decode! This one was Eb/N0 = +9.7 dB Summary of recent tests 2016-03-31 22:00 +5.6 dB 2016-04-01 16:00 +7.3 dB 2016-04-02 07:30 +9.7 dB I wondered about that too, m
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-04/msg00034.html (11,000 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu