Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Lowfer\]\s+LF\:\s+Re\:\s+FET\s+change\,\s+hmmm\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Lowfer] LF: Re: FET change, hmmm (score: 1)
Author: DAVE PICK <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 14:50:45 +0000 (GMT)
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00674.html (14,651 bytes)

2. Re: [Lowfer] LF: Re: FET change, hmmm (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 10:05:46 -0500
Understood but there has got to be more to it that my mind is not absorbing. The FQA32N20C spec sheet gives 1700 pf but they are making the waveform much softer than the FQA34N20's spec'd at 2400 pf
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00675.html (18,435 bytes)

3. Re: [Lowfer] LF: Re: FET change, hmmm (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 15:37:31 +0000
Millar feedback capacitance The multiplication of Gate-Drain capacitance  due to negative feedback.    Don't just look at Cgs,  but also at Cgd Andy www.g4jnt.com On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 15:12, N1BUG
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00676.html (17,133 bytes)

4. Re: [Lowfer] LF: Re: FET change, hmmm (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 15:50:25 -0500
All I know is this amp had very little drain ringing and worked well with FQA34N20 FETs but it is not happy with FQA32N20. I slowly increased drain voltage but at 200W out (of a kilowatt deck), there
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00681.html (15,607 bytes)

5. Re: [Lowfer] LF: Re: FET change, hmmm (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2018 16:53:48 +0100
Paul Ringing of FETS is an Early Warning sign for a Big Bang There should be no ringing or singing. g3kev All I know is this amp had very little drain ringing and worked well with FQA34N20 FETs but i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-12/msg00009.html (11,655 bytes)

6. Re: [Lowfer] LF: Re: FET change, hmmm (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2018 17:47:49 +0100
Paul Use the DECCA 5501 bridge cct and you will not have a problem, no ringing, singing or dancing. 73 gl de mal/g3kev All I know is this amp had very little drain ringing and worked well with FQA34N
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-12/msg00011.html (12,086 bytes)

7. Re: [Lowfer] LF: Re: FET change, hmmm (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2018 17:38:58 +0100
Hi Paul, In one of my early PA designa i also used an IR2110 to drive FETs having 4 nF gate capacity. At 137 kHz the driver became quite hot and the total life time was just about 20 hours. In my opi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-12/msg00021.html (12,799 bytes)

8. Re: [Lowfer] LF: Re: FET change, hmmm (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2018 17:01:55 +0000
Hello Stefan, Any chance of a few photos of the H Bridge amp construction please? I take it the BF862's in the optocoupler feeds act as current limiters? Any reason you didn't just use resistors inst
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-12/msg00022.html (12,659 bytes)

9. Re: [Lowfer] LF: Re: FET change, hmmm (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2018 14:28:22 -0500
Hello Chris, LF I was so frustrated I did not get out the camera to take photos of the scope traces. But I promise before I remove these FETs I will do that and post some waveforms with the original
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-12/msg00025.html (14,882 bytes)

10. Re: [Lowfer] LF: Re: FET change, hmmm (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 15:44:53 +0100
Hi Chris, Am 02.12.2018 18:01, schrieb Chris Wilson: Any chance of a few photos of the H Bridge amp construction please? OK, here are some impressions ;-) Outside: http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/sc
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-12/msg00050.html (18,992 bytes)

11. Re: [Lowfer] LF: Re: FET change, hmmm (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 16:39:23 +0100
Hi Chris, Wow, i'm impressed. There seem to be really better FETs nowadays, and they are quite cheap! Here is another parametric search from RS UK: https://uk.rs-online.com/web/c/semiconductors/discr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-12/msg00051.html (23,392 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu