Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 417 ]

Total 417 documents matching your query.

241. Re: LF: Getting started. (score: 1)
Author: John Bruce McCreath <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 15:07:53 -0400
Hi Tom, The Icom R-75 and the Kenwood TS-440 (transceiver) both work well on LF. I've used the latter rig since 2005 and have been very pleased with it, having logged a few European and UK stations.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-05/msg00073.html (9,128 bytes)

242. Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE (score: 1)
Author: John Bruce McCreath <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 12:31:03 -0400
If you want to see how well a group can work with one "moderator", check out this link to TheRadioBoard: http://www.theradioboard.com/rb/ 73, J.B., VE3EAR LowFER Beacon "EAR" 188.830 kHz. QRSS30 EN93
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-05/msg00093.html (12,522 bytes)

243. LF: New to list (score: 1)
Author: "J. B. Weazle McCreath" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 13:42:50 +0100
Hello everyone, I'm new to the LF list, having subscribed just a few weeks ago, and I've just been "reading the mail" up until now. I've noticed that the bulk of the posts deal with reception reports
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00197.html (9,539 bytes)

244. LF: A progress report (score: 1)
Author: "J. B. Weazle McCreath" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 21:01:04 +0100
Welcome to the reflector. Not only are questions permissible, they they are practically compulsory. We have already made the mistakes you are probably going to make, so put your proposals forward and
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00400.html (10,391 bytes)

245. LF: Loop antenna problem (score: 1)
Author: "J. B. Weazle McCreath" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 00:52:19 +0100
Hello LF Group, I've finally finished the construction of my LF loop and I appear to have a problem with it regarding the connection to the receiver. The loop itself is in the form of an octagon, wit
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-05/msg00118.html (13,199 bytes)

246. LF: Re: Re: Loop antenna problem (score: 1)
Author: "J. B. Weazle McCreath" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 13:18:36 +0100
Hello John, LF group, Thanks for your reply. The pickup loop is basically as you described, but with a slight difference. The feedline comes to the bottom of the loop where the shield is exposed, the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-05/msg00123.html (12,190 bytes)

247. LF: Re: Re: Loop antenna problem (score: 1)
Author: "J. B. Weazle McCreath" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 13:30:13 +0100
Hello Niels, LF group, Yes, it is a rather large loop! I have a few pix of it if anyone would like to see how I've built it. Your guess of the inductance is close, I measured it with my LCR-55 meter
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-05/msg00124.html (13,319 bytes)

248. LF: Re: Loop antenna problem W1TAG suggestion (score: 1)
Author: "J. B. Weazle McCreath" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 12:11:11 +0100
J.B., There is another approach you might want to consider. Skip the single turn link altogether. Rather than the normal parallel tuning, series tune the loop into a transformer wound on a ferrite c
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-05/msg00129.html (13,365 bytes)

249. LF: Re: Loop antenna problem, W1TAG suggestion (score: 1)
Author: "J. B. Weazle McCreath" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 12:48:15 +0100
This is probably the best approach for your loop, or any series or parallel arrangment I use a parallel resonating approach on my 80 m perimeter vertical loop and never had a problem. G3KEV Hello Mal
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-05/msg00136.html (12,024 bytes)

250. LF: Re: RE: Loop antenna problem (score: 1)
Author: "J. B. Weazle McCreath" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 01:29:16 +0100
coupling loop, which is only loop. Hi Jim, LF Group, My antenna is based on the successful design by Steve, VE7SL, with only two differences, 1) my pickup loop is shielded, and 2) I used #12 wire ra
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-05/msg00141.html (11,430 bytes)

251. LF: Re: Loop troubles & suggestions (score: 1)
Author: "J. B. Weazle McCreath" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 21:58:02 +0100
Hello Jim, LFers, Thanks for clarifying the issues about my loop...I really am greatful to all who have offered suggestions...you and the gang here are a great bunch of fellows with plenty of experie
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-05/msg00154.html (10,473 bytes)

252. LF: Loop problem revealed? (score: 1)
Author: "J. B. Weazle McCreath" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 11:04:04 +0100
J.B. - what rx are you using with the loop? Another thought....could there be a problem with the coax cable? ...old? ...moisture? ....shield open at the connector? Steve / VE7SL Hi Steve, LFers, I'm
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-05/msg00167.html (12,908 bytes)

253. LF: Re: Loop (score: 1)
Author: "J. B. Weazle McCreath" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 20:58:06 +0100
Hello Mitch, LFer's, That would be great, thanks very much! I'm home most evenings and every weekend, so you shouldn't have any problem catching me. Contact me on the local repeater, 146.940, PL123,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-05/msg00177.html (8,893 bytes)

254. LF: Loop success!! (at last) (score: 1)
Author: "J. B. Weazle McCreath" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 19:00:28 +0100
Hello LFers, A combination of time off and good weather finally let me try out the series tuned into a transformer hookup on my loop. After trying out several ratios, I found that 4:1 seemed to produ
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-05/msg00197.html (12,171 bytes)

255. LF: LF definitions (score: 1)
Author: "J. B. Weazle McCreath" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 12:06:15 +0100
Hi JB, congrats on sorting the loop....it is worth the effort ...LF may stand for Low Frequency but it also stands for Lotsa Frustration, Learning Fast, ( even Lovely Folk) and above all Lotsa Fun..
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-05/msg00200.html (11,517 bytes)

256. LF: Who and where? (score: 1)
Author: "J. B. Weazle McCreath" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 23:44:18 +0100
Hello LFers, Is there anyone on the list who can tell me the identity and location of two signals I copied using QRSS60 at or near to 137.780 as "XXO" and "XGJ" ? It sure was nice to see some activit
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-06/msg00049.html (9,958 bytes)

257. LF: XES solid @ EN93dr (score: 1)
Author: "J. B. Weazle McCreath" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 02:13:18 +0100
Hello LFers, I had a very solid copy of "XES" using DFCW mode here on Lake Huron at 02:00 UTC. It's nice to know my antenna efforts are yielding results! 73, J.B., VE3EAR - VE3WZL @ EN93dr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-06/msg00131.html (9,369 bytes)

258. Re: LF: XES solid @ EN93dr (score: 1)
Author: "J. B. Weazle McCreath" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:49:51 +0100
J.B. Are you copying "XGJ" 0.5 Hz above "XES"? Hello Warren, LFers, Yes, I sure am! I see you pretty much every evening. I'm using a VE7SL style loop with no preamp into a TS-440. 73, J.B.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-06/msg00135.html (8,892 bytes)

259. LF: XES copy early a.m. (score: 1)
Author: "J. B. Weazle McCreath" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 12:03:34 +0100
Hello LFer's, I had a good early morning copy of the DFCW signal from XES today. First time I've seen him during daylight hours in weeks. 73, J.B., VE3EAR - VE3WZL EN93dr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-07/msg00021.html (9,394 bytes)

260. LF: Suitable ground? (score: 1)
Author: "J. B. Weazle McCreath" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 23:53:15 +0100
Hello LFer's, The soil at my QTH is composed mostly of gravel, which makes getting a decent ground for RF purposes rather difficult for two reasons, driving in ground rods, and poor soil conductivity
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-07/msg00025.html (10,488 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu