Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 562 ]

Total 562 documents matching your query.

341. LF: XES Carrier tonight (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 15:30:20 -0500
Thanks for the reports on the "dead carrier" last night. I've had a request to repeat it again tonight, so XES will be back on 137.57730950601398944854736328125 kHz <g> again, starting at 2230 UTC. T
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00113.html (9,210 bytes)

342. Re: LF: Slow BPSK Test (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:03:44 +0000
Tonight's WD2XES test will be a dead carrier on 137,577.309506014 Hz, interrupted only by CW ID's on the top and bottom of the hour. There will be no (intentional) phase changes at this end. The carr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00127.html (10,575 bytes)

343. Re: LF: Slow BPSK Test (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 21:09:24 +0000
Markus - Yes, your report was from Saturday. Tnx. John A. hmm sorry John, that was Saturday, right? Markus In einer eMail vom 19.02.2006 21:53:55 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt MarkusVester@aol.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00138.html (10,363 bytes)

344. Re: LF: Re: Slow BPSK Test (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 20:48:32 +0000
J.B., It's really not aimed at Argo, but you will certainly be able to see a solid carrier with blips every 15 minutes. The slower you go, the more blips you will get on the screen. <g> John A. Hi Jo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00141.html (11,920 bytes)

345. LF: Slow BPSK Test (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 19:29:09 +0000
WD2XES will try a run of slow BPSK on the following very odd frequency tonight: 137,577.309506014 Hz. This frequency appears to be clear of Loran lines for 1 Hz either side over a fairly large area,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00144.html (11,266 bytes)

346. Re: LF: SAQ Rx (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 13:37:12 +0000
Had periods of decent copy in both runs. Haven't heard anything but the ID's, though. Am presently listening through a tight BP filter on Spectran, and noticed that there was a decent visual display
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00156.html (9,264 bytes)

347. Re: LF: Slow PSK result (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 02:29:49 +0000
Markus, I apologize for the late response -- we were out this evening. I won't be running tonight, but may be back tomorrow night. Not sure of the frequency yet, but will advise on Sunday. John A.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00178.html (9,180 bytes)

348. Re: LF: Slow PSK result (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:13:51 +0000
Markus, That's a great shot -- thanks for your creativity. Was that done through a sound card, or an external A/D? John A.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00187.html (9,101 bytes)

349. Re: LF: Slow BPSK Test (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:03:34 +0000
Thanks to Hartmut, Steve Dove, and Jean-Pierre for reports thus far. Peter Martinez did copy the signal last night, and is analyzing the data. The BPSK keying is clearly visible in his plots. We will
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00196.html (10,761 bytes)

350. Re: LF: Slow BPSK Test (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:42:16 +0000
Markus, Thanks. I had a rough start-up due to an earlier power failure, but hopefully everything is OK. John A. John and LF Group, I have started to record decimated IQ audio in a 2.7 Hz channel arou
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00208.html (11,037 bytes)

351. Re: LF: Slow BPSK Test (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:41:01 +0000
Hartmut, No, the power has been steady, as far as I know. We were out for about an hour after the start-up, though. The AC power was out here when I came home from work, so I'm hoping that the GPS-sy
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00209.html (11,485 bytes)

352. LF: Slow BPSK Test (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:06:02 -0500
WD2XES will again be running a test on 136.71875 kHz tonight, starting at 2230 or 2245. Reports and screen shots from the U.K. and EU would be welcome. The frequency was chosen for math reasons with
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00216.html (9,550 bytes)

353. LF: Re: LF TA (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 11:05:26 -0500
Just to second Jay's report of last night -- CT1DRP copy was excellent for most of the night. I had weaker copy of Markus' Hell signal, but could tell that something was there. John Andrews
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00267.html (10,625 bytes)

354. LF: XES WOLF Again (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 11:09:22 -0500
WD2XES will run WOLF (10) tonight on 137.577 kHz. Reports are always welcome. Start time should be around 2300 UTC. John Andrews, W1TAG/WD2XES WD2XES Status: http://www.w1tag.com
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00269.html (8,933 bytes)

355. Re: LF: XES WOLF Again (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:51:19 -0500
WD2XES will run WOLF (10) again tonight on 137.577 kHz. Start time should be before 2300 UTC. John Andrews, W1TAG/WD2XES WD2XES status: http://www.w1tag.com
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00313.html (9,372 bytes)

356. Re: LF: XES WOLF Again (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:44:49 -0500
Michel, Hartmut: Very nice WOLF copy from both of you. Thanks for the reports. Michel, it looks like you have everything set up correctly. Your computer's sampling rate must be close to the standard
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00333.html (9,560 bytes)

357. Re: LF: TA 4 JAN 06 (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 12:49:44 +0000
Jay, We will be having another coastal storm tonight, so cndx are likely to be as bad. But things clear out on Sunday, and the first half of the week looks quiet. JA High static levels continue. Only
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00362.html (9,166 bytes)

358. Re: LF: TA 5 JAN 06 (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 13:24:45 +0000
Noise from my neighbors seems to be a bigger problem than noise from the sky these days, but I did catch a couple of "NM's" around 0300 UTC: I join Jay in thanking you for the short ID, Markus! John
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00397.html (8,736 bytes)

359. Re: LF: The mystery signal (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 09:26:13 -0500
J.B., If you have the shot of the entire screen, email it to me directly. I suspect you are seeing some products from strong signals elsewhere on the screen. One of the lines in your "sandwich" appea
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00434.html (10,474 bytes)

360. Re: LF: Fw: TA (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 11:54:07 +0000
I didn't start the captures until 0300, but had clear copy of CT1DRP's "Loran Line" on 136.71875 kHz from 0300 to 0500, and a weaker version between 0700 and 0830. John Andrews, W1TAG
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00449.html (8,645 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu