Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 562 ]

Total 562 documents matching your query.

321. LF: Re: RE: WD2XES WOLF 2.5 Tonight (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 12:59:51 +0100
All, Thanks to Jay, Lloyd, Laurence, Tom, & Hartmut for the successful copy reports last night. To Dave Pick: Thanks for running the captures...I did screen grabs on them overnight. It looks like the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-12/msg00204.html (8,976 bytes)

322. LF: Re: NA (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 08:54:55 -0500
There were four North American signals on the CT1DRP screen last night, WD2XES, WD2XKO, VO1NA and WD2XDW. They all peaked at different times, but did appear together in one shot around 0420 UTC. The
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-12/msg00222.html (8,449 bytes)

323. Re: LF: QRS.EXE (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 21:51:20 +0100
Gary, So I will check the BIOS. The actual problem is that it will only key the DOTS. You need a dash-matrix printer. <g> John A.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-12/msg00233.html (8,900 bytes)

324. Re: LF: TA New Year's Eve (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 00:21:42 +0000
After a promising start, the screen has been virtually dead for the last hour and a half. Have only seen part of one character from DRP. Happy New Year, in any case. Did everyone enjoy the extra seco
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00000.html (9,173 bytes)

325. Re: LF: TA New Year's Eve (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 13:13:10 +0000
After a couple of hours with no copy, signals picked up after 0200. The best copy of Laurie was around 0300: The lower signal on the right is a local thing, source unknown. Further AQC copy was spott
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00006.html (10,286 bytes)

326. Re: LF: TA 2 JAN 06 (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 13:17:53 +0000
I had a lot of local noise last night, and hence no useful copy. Brian and Laurie were weakly visible at times, however. John Andrews
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00016.html (10,511 bytes)

327. Re: LF: TA (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 02:30:55 +0000
About the same here at 0230, with some signs of Laurie (136.3195) and a blur that was probably KEV (136.3183) at a faster keying rate. Will leave the captures running overnight. John Andrews, W1TAG
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00040.html (11,410 bytes)

328. Re: LF: TA as seen at EN93dr (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 02:47:02 +0000
J.B., That's definitely DRP, though your frequency reading is a little high. The other signal is Laurie, G3AQC, who appears offset by the same amount. Good work! JA Hello LFers, Here is what I'm seei
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00042.html (9,469 bytes)

329. LF: TA 05 Jan (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 12:05:53 +0000
Last night was much quieter, but both Brian and Laurie earned some frequent fader miles. It was a bit difficult to get complete callsigns, even with the three letters. DRP finally faded out around 08
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00048.html (9,879 bytes)

330. Re: LF: TA 7 JAN 06 (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 13:04:10 +0000
My results were similar to Jay's, though at a noisier QTH <g>. The best copy of Jim was around 0330...not much was seen either before or after. The DRP copy was pretty good from about 0H on. The clea
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00101.html (10,749 bytes)

331. Re: LF: Who is WX ? (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 21:51:53 +0000
Uwe, DJ8WX Hi, Who is it sending WX on 136318.5? Strong siganal. Regards, Gary - G4WGT - IO83qp Web : http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00161.html (8,905 bytes)

332. Re: LF: What is ? (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:35:12 -0500
Jean-Pierre, CT1DRP has been transmitting DFCW on 136.318 kHz. John Andrews, W1TAG/WD2XES
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00187.html (9,337 bytes)

333. Re: LF: TA 12 JAN 06 (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:54:01 +0000
Same as Jay -- poor copy due to local wx. There were signs of Uwe's signal, though: John Andrews, W1TAG JPEG image
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00192.html (8,847 bytes)

334. Re: LF: TA 12 JAN 06 (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:18:21 -0500
Uwe, I would expect our local conditions to be much better tonight. We are then expecting rain on Friday and Saturday nights, but it's unclear whether the storm will have lightning. We keep getting t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00194.html (10,194 bytes)

335. Re: LF: TA Jan, 11/12th (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:25:23 -0500
I'll bet that if Mitch would slow down to QRSS60, Hartmut could copy him under these conditions. JA Hartmut, That UNID may be MP, Mitch Powell, VE3OT. Check the KIĜLE grabber: http://www.cpinternet.c
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00198.html (9,850 bytes)

336. Re: LF: Re: Mini Whip and local noise (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:56:19 +0000
Jim's comments make sense, and I hope to do some experiments as time permits. I have been treating LF receive loops as balanced antennas, with no intended ground reference. This has been easy in my c
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00324.html (11,693 bytes)

337. Re: LF: LF; T/A January 21 (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:16:50 +0000
Roelof, That is probably XES, but I can't be sure. XES will be back on tonight, starting earlier than I have during the week, probably around 2200 UTC. The DFCW with 90 second elements looks best on
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00347.html (10,470 bytes)

338. Re: LF: QRSS elements (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 14:20:20 +0000
Mike, Let me backtrack, as I didn't state the situation fully in yesterday's message. I was not trying to equate DFCW with 90 second elements to QRSS30! The issue is only about appearance on the scre
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00368.html (10,842 bytes)

339. Re: LF: RE: ZL1BPU QRV (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 19:36:38 +0000
Jim, The main problem with the more exotic modes on LF is very few stations are able to transmit them, and also receiving them is more complicated. < I'm ready when you are... <g> John A.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00395.html (9,819 bytes)

340. LF: WD2XES WOLF Tonight (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 08:52:13 -0500
WD2XES will be running in WOLF (10 b/s standard mode) tonight on 137.577 kHz, hopefully starting at 2230 UTC. Reports are welcome. John Andrews, W1TAG/WD2XES WD2XES status: http://www.w1tag.com
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00461.html (8,214 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu