Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 808 ]

Total 808 documents matching your query.

81. Re: LF: Take care lads, grass fire here... (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:50:05 -0400
Chris, I recall throwing snowballs at a flaming tree one winter evening. Small fire -- mostly the insulation on the wire for my loop antenna. But the tree bark had definitely joined the blaze. So, it
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-06/msg00211.html (10,364 bytes)

82. Re: LF: Monitoring 2190m WSPR (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 13:46:16 -0400
Paul, Conditions were much better last week. We are currently in a coronal hole flow which has depressed the northerly LF paths. Dst numbers are around -70, another indicator. DCF39 was way down last
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-10/msg00280.html (13,535 bytes)

83. Re: LF: TXing 2200m WSPR (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 18:36:54 -0500
Paul, I had to wait a bit until the fading gods relaxed a bit, but was able to copy your N1BUG CW ID just before 2332Z. Copy was easy through a 30 Hz audio filter. K3RWR's carrier is is also plainly
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-12/msg00275.html (8,855 bytes)

84. Re: LF: Now transmitting DFCW (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 15:29:10 -0400
Capture below, showing a 0.2 Hz shift. John, W1TAG Attachment: N1BUG.jpg Description: JPEG image
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-03/msg00212.html (8,792 bytes)

85. Re: LF: EbNaut March 29/30 (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 18:42:58 -0400
Markus, I was out last night, and did some looking when I came home, but failed to find Rob's signal on 137.490 kHz. Nothing seen during the day today. But tonight, I see a likely signal on 137.395 k
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-03/msg00399.html (9,800 bytes)

86. Re: LF: EbNaut April 1 / 2 (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 15:08:07 -0400
Markus, Just to let you know that others are looking as well. I've easily been able to decode the K3RWR transmissions, but have had no luck with the EU signals thus far. Still working through the pos
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-04/msg00038.html (13,527 bytes)

87. Re: LF: EbNaut April 1 / 2 (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 16:06:28 -0400
Markus, Thanks very much. That frequency appears to be OK here, at least to a casual examination. John, W1TAG Best 73, Markus (DF6NM) Markus, Just to let you know that others are looking as well. I'v
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-04/msg00043.html (14,310 bytes)

88. Re: LF: N!BUG received on 137 kHz at DL0AO (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 11:24:17 -0400
Paul, All, Congrats on the summer reception, and I hope you can do something 2-way. From my humble QTH in MA, I operated on 2200m from 2004 until 2015 or so. Looking back at the logs, which were prop
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-07/msg00206.html (11,184 bytes)

89. Re: LF: Mystery signal on 137.000 (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 19:22:48 -0400
Paul, It's almost certainly CFH. It's been quite a while since they burned off the cobwebs on their 137 kHz setup. Was almost wondering if they gave up on the frequency. If they start modulating, I'd
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-09/msg00172.html (9,506 bytes)

90. Re: LF: LF WSPR spots J1LPB in Hamilton, Canada (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 13:56:46 -0400
I have asked him for a description of his receving setup. Will post the results here. John, W1TAG I do not believe he could hear Europe stronger than he hears the strong stations close to him. How co
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-10/msg00184.html (10,143 bytes)

91. Re: LF: LF tonite (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 08:27:39 -0500
Stefan, A number of DK7FC fragments were received during the night. The best copy was the sequence that started around 2150Z, missing only the "D". Another sequence starting around 0250 was very clea
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00312.html (9,976 bytes)

92. Re: LF: LF tonite (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 13:15:20 -0500
Stefan, The attached shot had the ID starting around 2150Z. John, W1TAG Many thanks for watching. Can you show a small capture of the traces. It is always good to see something. Good to see that some
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00322.html (11,607 bytes)

93. Re: LF: LF tonite (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 13:19:13 -0500
Stefan, And this one was has the "D" starting at 0250Z. Conditions might improve in the next two days before another coronal hole flow starts up. We're nowhere near the good conditions we had before
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00323.html (10,572 bytes)

94. Re: LF: LF last night (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 10:05:52 -0500
No real DFCW or fuzzy clouds detected last night, just the occasional DK7FC bright spot. I was closer to a coastal storm than Paul, which may explain the difference. John, W1TAG
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00341.html (8,818 bytes)

95. Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15 (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 08:30:35 -0500
I ran the "new" and old versions on separate computers last night, but had no decodes. The as-yet unlocated local sproggie on 137.620 is possibly the culprit. John, W1TAG
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00398.html (11,528 bytes)

96. Re: LF: WSPR-15 last night (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 08:23:42 -0500
Well, finally some results! I have been running two XP computers, one with the original WSPR-X (v0.8 r3058), and the other with the current wsprd.exe (plus dll's). There were no results over the week
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00443.html (10,959 bytes)

97. Re: LF: WSPR-15 in WSJT-X (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 18:51:09 -0500
Joe has raised those questions before, and I've assumed that he has not been happy with the responses, including mine. Maybe a greater number of opinions would be of help. Regarding #2, the averaging
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00528.html (10,378 bytes)

98. Re: LF: AW: WSPR-15 weekend (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2018 18:51:33 -0500
Stefan, Got you at 2230Z at -39 dB. John, W1TAG
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-12/msg00027.html (8,644 bytes)

99. Re: LF: AW: WSPR-15 weekend (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 08:17:07 -0500
Stefan, Last night might have been better without the static from storms in the southeastern U.S. It was still fairly quiet here at 2230Z. John, W1TAG Thank you. I saw you watching the recent days an
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-12/msg00033.html (10,525 bytes)

100. Re: LF: Ebnaut receiver frequency stability qustion (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 08:27:26 -0500
Question: I have a homebrew receiver with I and Q outputs that I built some time ago. It has a 10 MHz input which is divided down to 125 kHz, and my old HP GPS receiver is still working fine. It woul
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-12/msg00301.html (10,918 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu