Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 808 ]

Total 808 documents matching your query.

381. LF: Re: 73kHz Beacon (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 10:22:55 -0500
Laurie, Nothing heard last night. Condx fell completely apart during the evening, so I'm not surprised! John Andrews, W1TAG
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00375.html (9,072 bytes)

382. LF: Re: 73kHz Beacon (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 10:08:51 -0500
Laurie, I've been listening, too. Nothing seen on Friday night or Sunday night. The frequency is much better than the original, though. I will listen again tonight, though that CME is reported to be
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00393.html (10,095 bytes)

383. LF: W1TAG Screen Captures (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 17:56:21 -0500
From 2300 until 0300, captures of the 135.921 - 135.924 spectrum as received at W1TAG, Holden, Massachusetts (FN42ch) will be available at: http://webpages.charter.net/w1tag/cap-1.jpg The screen shot
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-12/msg00000.html (7,971 bytes)

384. LF: Re: Re LF Waste (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 11:40:14 -0500
Last night began with G3KEV at 0900, which is about 15 minutes BEFORE my sunset. Mal's signal was very good for a while, and then seemed to drop to a lower level, though it was still copyable. Caught
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-12/msg00015.html (8,848 bytes)

385. LF: Re: Re: 136 tonight (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 18:26:48 -0500
John and all. It's tough to find a gap in that area. I am on 921.5, (3:1, 60sec) and there are two stations just above this then the 7fsk signal occupying most of the rest of your "window". I will s
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-12/msg00032.html (9,855 bytes)

386. LF: Re: Great LF prop died at 0015 UTC! (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 20:35:45 -0500
Dex, That Mal's sure got one heck of a signal. Good candidate for a personality transplant, though. At about 0015 UTC Mal's signal stopped. Perhaps he went QRT. But look at the other signals. Even th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-12/msg00064.html (10,211 bytes)

387. Re: LF: 136 (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 14:56:54 -0500
John, Hi John what time do they tx on 182.2? I have sharp low pass filtor with break at 150kHz but will try to listen for them 24-hour, except for wandering attention spans! Seriously, it would be an
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-12/msg00113.html (10,688 bytes)

388. Re: LF: 136 (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 10:11:49 -0500
John, et al: About QRSS, DFCW es 7 freq . I find qrss to be very effective. I believe DFCW is even more effective than QRSS because you can send info much faster for the same signal to noise ratio. T
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-12/msg00120.html (12,588 bytes)

389. Re: LF: ID? (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 07:29:17 -0500
Mal, I will be running screen captures on 135.922 tonight from 2300 until about 0200, set for 60 second dots. Will be happy to see if I can get a complete ID. John Andrews, W1TAG
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-12/msg00123.html (9,819 bytes)

390. LF: ID? (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001 20:25:30 -0500
Just came downstairs to find the following on the screen at 0115: 3/4 of a Gii3KEV? Frequency was 135.9219, 60 sec dots. Appears to have faded out for now, and I have to switch frequencies. John Andr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-12/msg00129.html (9,716 bytes)

391. LF: Re: 135.923 (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001 21:06:30 -0500
Copied M0BMU in 7FSK mode on 136.923 kHz from about 0030 to 0120 UTC tonight. Unfortunately, I had Argo in 90 sec/dot mode, as I wasn't expecting the signal. The result is a little hard to decode, bu
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-12/msg00137.html (8,520 bytes)

392. LF: Re: G3AQC on 135.920 (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 18:52:14 -0500
I had Laurie briefly around 2300 -- unfortunately, I had left Argo set for 20 second dots, so it's a little choppy: I switched to 10 second dots right after that, but the signal has since disappeared
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-12/msg00187.html (8,459 bytes)

393. LF: 73 kHz last night (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 09:34:11 -0500
Saw some pieces of Laurie's signal between 2300 and 0000 last night, but nothing useful after that, though my checks were only occasional. Also looked on 135.922, with nothing seen, but OM2TW's actua
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-12/msg00232.html (8,849 bytes)

394. Re: LF: Re: long haul QSO's - SQUID... (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 15:56:45 -0500
Steve: Taking the LWCA list as an indicator, the LowFer list has some 60 odd participants. Some of us are very odd. But proud of it! John Andrews, W1TAG
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-12/msg00250.html (10,220 bytes)

395. LF: 73 kHz 17 Dec (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 21:00:05 -0500
Have been seeing Laurie all evening -- not overpowering, but copyable with Argo's 120 sec/dot screen. Am presently set so that Peter would be visible, but nothing has shown thus far. We have an ice s
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-12/msg00302.html (8,351 bytes)

396. LF: Re: CFH at 73.8 kHz (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 20:35:43 -0500
John Currie, Hi all I hope some one in Eu has been able to check out 73.8. I'm still seeing what I suspect is another CFH at 73.8 kHz I have been seeing it continuously for 3 hours. I tseems to be as
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-12/msg00303.html (8,947 bytes)

397. LF: Re: 73kHz propagation monitoring (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 16:23:43 -0500
Peter, Could this transmission be used to monitor 73.3kHz on a regular basis? Perhaps it has and it has somehow passed me by! It certainly could, providing that I get around to doing it on a regular
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-12/msg00307.html (9,412 bytes)

398. LF: Re: Re. 73kHz (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 19:57:37 -0500
Laurie disappeared over an hour ago, and there was no convincing sign of Peter by that time, so I'll assume that the ionosphere has moved on to deeds of more exalted usefulness. We just don't seem to
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-12/msg00325.html (8,757 bytes)

399. LF: Re. 73kHz (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 18:37:21 -0500
Things don't look as good as they did last night. Laurie's signal is pretty choppy, with some longer fades. Now that I've got Peter's frequency correct, I can only say that something is going on ther
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-12/msg00326.html (8,562 bytes)

400. LF: Re: Re: G3AQC MØBMU 72.4 kHz received in NC (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 16:43:05 -0500
Peter, The "W1TAG Propagation Machine" is giving a favourable opinion at this point. I saw Dex's 177.777 kHz beacon an hour before sunset (about 1000 km). Laurie is currently sending a "G" which star
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-12/msg00330.html (8,835 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu