Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 1130 ]

Total 1130 documents matching your query.

221. Re: AW: Re: VLF: 8270.000 Hz and forest VLF grabber preparations... (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:10:29 +0000
Decoded here in Todmorden, easily with Eb/N0 = +9.2 dB That means, 10 second symbols would have been fine, but I never seem to succeed in decoding your 10 second messages, such as This I could not de
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00236.html (11,571 bytes)

222. Re: AW: Re: VLF: 8270.000 Hz and forest VLF grabber preparations... (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:24:08 +0000
Another easy decode, Eb/N0 = +10.9 dB. This signal is strong enough here for 5 second symbols. -- Paul Nicholson --
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00248.html (10,372 bytes)

223. Re: AW: AW: Re: AW: Re: VLF: 8270.000 Hz and forest VLF grabber preparations... (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:50:51 +0000
No problem, decoded with Eb/N0 = +6.7, a bit weaker thanks to the nighttime noise but would still do 10 second symbols. These are false decodes, just random noise which happens to have a correct CRC.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00257.html (13,031 bytes)

224. Re: AW: Re: VLF: 8270.000 Hz and forest VLF grabber preparations...DONE.. (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:47:05 +0000
The message decoded anyway, enough was received before you switched off. Eb/N0 = -2.5 dB from BER 42.6 % The carrier strength corresponds to Eb/N0 = +6.4 dB The BER and Eb/N0 are somewhat bogus becau
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00278.html (11,767 bytes)

225. Re: LF: EbNaut on MF (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:09:59 +0000
I tracked this down to a problem in my receive timing system, the one that mixes the signal and PPS into a BT878. With that fixed, I can no longer reproduce the anomaly here. EbSynth checks out ok -
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00280.html (10,643 bytes)

226. Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: VLF: 8270.000 Hz and forest VLF grabber preparations...DONE.. (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 20:39:41 +0000
Good signal tonight, decoded with Eb/N0 = +10.2 dB -- Paul Nicholson --
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00285.html (11,390 bytes)

227. Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: VLF: 8270.000 Hz and forest VLF grabber preparations...DONE.. (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:35:08 +0000
All decoded with no problem. So far we have 16:00 Eb/N0 = +10.4 dB -24.2 deg abs phase 19:30 Eb/N0 = +8.8 dB -7.2 deg abs phase 23:00 Eb/N0 = +11.0 dB -1.8 deg abs phase 02:30 Eb/N0 = +10.8 dB -10.2
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00287.html (11,859 bytes)

228. LF: MF: EbNaut (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 18:59:38 +0000
Hoping to do some testing this evening at 477.695 kHz after a rebuild of the TX. A bigger PSU gives me around 150W DC input so that should be good for a few extra dB. Hoping to see if the anomaly bet
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00303.html (9,111 bytes)

229. Re: LF: MF: EbNaut (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 19:57:43 +0000
Some interruptions to the signal, a problem with the tx and I've had to drop down to a lower power. Next complete message starts 20:00. -- Paul Nicholson --
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00305.html (9,081 bytes)

230. Re: LF: MF: EbNaut (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 00:03:47 +0000
Thanks Markus, much appreciated. A good decode of a weak signal. Maybe tomorrow I'll try again with higher power so that anomaly will show up more clearly if still present. PA was misbehaving tonight
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00311.html (9,540 bytes)

231. Re: LF: MF: EbNaut (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 19:40:57 +0000
That was me at 477695.00000 Hz, 5Hz below VO1NA. 22:28 to 22:30 carrier 22:30 to ~ 22:40 EbNaut with same signaling rate as Joe. Distance about 450 km. ERP something below 100mW. -- Paul Nicholson --
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00318.html (10,191 bytes)

232. Re: LF: MF: EbNaut (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 21:23:51 +0000
Not me. Active on the evening of the 13th and overnight 477.695 kHz 14th 22:24:00 to 15th 16:00:00. Maybe it was Riccardo IW4DXW JN64 who also has been using 477.695 kHz with EbNaut, same signaling r
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00321.html (10,529 bytes)

233. Re: LF: MF: EbNaut (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:50:33 +0000
That's some good reception Roelof. I'm going to find myself a hawthorne tree. No EbNaut from here for a couple of days, waiting for parts to arrive. My junk box has let me down and I have to go shopp
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00332.html (10,779 bytes)

234. Re: LF: MF: EbNaut (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:02:01 +0000
Interesting indeed, thanks. The idea of an inductor to restrict the shoot-through current is new to me and looks great. And the recovery winding over the tuning coil to restrict the load current by t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00334.html (11,246 bytes)

235. Re: LF: LF EbNaut tonight (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 20:06:53 +0000
Very nice, a good result at about 70% of capacity for that carrier S/N. The 54% bit error rate is false, indicating part of the signal was missing, I guess there was some padding. This misleads the e
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00366.html (8,876 bytes)

236. Re: LF: MSF Is wrong (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 19:47:28 +0000
Same here. I just grabbed this from the VLF rx, http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/160225a.png -- Paul Nicholson --
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00375.html (8,578 bytes)

237. Re: LF: MF: EbNaut (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 17:31:27 +0000
I'm thinking of playing a bit more with the tx on MF, after a rebuild of the PA. Now has a bit more power. Maybe enough to reach Italy? Wondering what frequency is best to use, I don't want to clobbe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00389.html (10,959 bytes)

238. Re: VLF: EbNaut 8270.1, Friday Feb 26 (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 17:44:59 +0000
Copied GIZMO at Eb/N0 = 0.7 with BER 36%. Not bad, considering the background noise from the thunderstorms. -- Paul Nicholson --
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00390.html (10,814 bytes)

239. Re: LF: MF: EbNaut (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 18:02:51 +0000
ok on now. Freq: 477690.00000 Hz Chars: 15 Symbols: 0.5 seconds Code: 8K19A Duration: 496 seconds, 00:08:16 Repeat: XX:00 XX:20 XX40 Not sure how well it will hold up. The ant Z is a bit different to
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00393.html (10,427 bytes)

240. Re: LF: MF: EbNaut (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 18:26:27 +0000
Ah I had to switch off, the output transformer is getting too hot, the wire is too thin. I'll do a quick rewind with some thicker wire and come back on later. Looks promising though. -- Paul Nicholso
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00395.html (10,405 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu