Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:: 119 ]

Total 119 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: SlowCW and Dwell periods (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Bryant" <>
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 1999 10:13:22 +0100
Idid ask for this some time ago, and Richard sent me the sources for an older version of the code, explaining that it was actually a hard problem, but if I wanted to have a go etc... The issue is tha
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-04/msg00016.html (12,368 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Des and slow cw test (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Bryant" <>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 22:17:46 +0100
Actually you don't need full blown specrogram to start up on a timer you just need a program that starts up on a timer and captures a .wav file, which you can then feed into spectrogram at your leasu
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-10/msg00112.html (9,779 bytes)

3. LF: Re: re remote/timed start-ups (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Bryant" <>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 08:07:22 +0100
Alan re recording .wav files (to feed into spectrogram), try http://www.nch.com.au/action/index.html It seems to be a wav recorder that you can set up on a timer. I have not tried it yet, but it look
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-10/msg00115.html (8,282 bytes)

4. LF: Crossed Field Antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Bryant" <>
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 1999 21:09:20 +0000
There is a good analysis of the CFA ("Crossed Field Antenna") that has been written up by Prof. Jefferies at University of Surrey which he has posted on the web at http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-11/msg00023.html (7,962 bytes)

5. LF: Balloon lofted antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Bryant" <>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 20:08:02 +0000
A friend of mine wants to put up a vertical in his back garden (actually to operate on 160m), and is thinking of using a met balloon to hold it aloft. I know that there has been some experience on th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00235.html (8,140 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Long integration times (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Bryant" <>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2000 08:34:34 +0000
For some time I have been thinking of setting up a remote receiver in a quite location linked back to a more conveniently located transmitter location. This would be an interesting extension. There a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00338.html (12,290 bytes)

7. Re: LF: DCF39 seen in the US? (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Bryant" <>
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2000 13:53:24 +0000
Andre - why not post it on a web site? Stewart Gentlemen, I have received from WA3USG a 1MB file that includes several snapsshots taken by Richard Goodman WA3USG showing what could well be a DCF trac
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00348.html (9,022 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Re. DECCA Tx (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Bryant" <>
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 00:18:12 +0100
It would be very important to ensure that there was no coupling between the two antennas. None the less a relative measurement between the two types of antenna, even at different sites would be very
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-03/msg00282.html (9,399 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Re: Telsa Coils (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Bryant" <>
Date: Wed, 03 May 2000 07:22:38 +0100
Peter Nice article. Would it be OK to put an edited version (with credits) in the Crawley Club newsletter? Thanks Stewart
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00024.html (8,272 bytes)

10. Re: LF: Re: Telsa Coils (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Bryant" <>
Date: Thu, 04 May 2000 07:29:50 +0100
Thanks Stewart Hello Stewart Yes, by all means. Note that I spelt Tesla wrong in the mailing -- Regards, Peter, G3LDO <>
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00044.html (8,566 bytes)

11. LF: [Fwd: [Lowfer] New software available for copying weak QRS-CW] (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Bryant" <>
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2000 07:18:02 +0100
This interesting post appeared on the lowfer mailing list last night. It gives more information on the CRUNCH program. Stewart G3YSX
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-06/msg00114.html (8,014 bytes)

12. Re: LF: Re: Aerial tests. (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Bryant" <>
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2000 07:26:36 +0100
To All from PA0SE Walter Blanchard quoted the RACAL expert who has in the past designed the Decca antennas as follows: circular This is not confirmed by computer simulation. Shouldn't you say "Compu
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-06/msg00115.html (9,827 bytes)

13. LF: Off topic - Soundblaster programming (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Bryant" <>
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 18:34:48 +0000
I know that it is off topic, and I apologies, but there is a good chance that the expertise will be on this list, and its always best to ask friends first. I am trying to measure the absolute value o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00118.html (8,785 bytes)

14. Re: LF: Re: Re: 73 khz permits (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Bryant" <>
Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2000 00:47:00 +0000
I agree. Stewart, g3ysx In my opinion, the Low Frequency Experimenter's handbook is very well done and excellent value. Thanks Peter for a job well done. John, G4CNN _________________________________
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00404.html (9,131 bytes)

15. Re: LF: S-meter standard (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Bryant" <>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:36:06 +0000
I know that this is a rather old thread that I have just come across when cleaning up my mail whilst waiting to fly through an ice storm to Boston. Why do the manufacturers still bother with S units.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00018.html (9,432 bytes)

16. Re: LF: Reflector for hi tech LF discussion (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Bryant" <>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:09:18 +0000
Please could you post the subscription info for Stewart G3YSX
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00126.html (10,191 bytes)

17. Re: LF: Splitting the reflector. (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Bryant" <>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:07:41 +0000
How about in the short term we agree to put an unambiguous marker in the subject line for the high tech postings (ie [TECH]) and then subscribers who do not want to see the postings can filter them s
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00127.html (9,199 bytes)

18. Re: LF: TR QSO (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Bryant" <>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 20:22:40 +0000
Others involved in amateur radio and especially LF might like to express an opinion about what constitutes a valid qso. Since the purpose of the QSO is to demonstrate that a communications link was e
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00146.html (9,103 bytes)

19. Re: LF: ERP / LF - where next (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Bryant" <>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 16:04:06 +0000
G3YSX wrote: Also if you think back to the RSGB convention, there was one paper that suggested that we are massively overestimating the efficiency of our antennas. If that work holds up, then we will
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00158.html (9,203 bytes)

20. Re: LF: Re: Re: Signalling margins and Shannon, shud we move on? (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Bryant" <>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 08:57:00 +0000
Gentlemen: With the completion of the TransAtlantic QSO is it time to consider moving on? I would hope that on reflection you do not feel the need to. The slow signal methods are just as much a part
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00170.html (9,977 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu