Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:


References: [ +from:: 48 ]

Total 48 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: RADCOM (score: 1)
Author: "" <>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 05:02:21 -0400
I've also noticed the trend, my renewal came up a couple of weeks ago and i agonised as to whether it was still worth having. I decided to continue ONLY to support the RSGB for what it does for us in
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00352.html (10,938 bytes)

2. LF: USB soundcards (score: 1)
Author: "" <>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:11:41 -0500
Thinking of improving my ability to inprove s/n to be able to display QRSS signals using argo, spectrum lab, and decode rtty, psk, cw etc. Current system for this purpose AMD K6 processor with Win95
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00525.html (8,622 bytes)

3. LF: new cw yahoo group (score: 1)
Author: Peter Cleall <>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 07:40:13 +0000 (GMT)
Saw this and thought it was amusing in the light of recent postings. Yahoo mail group dedicated to CW without CW skills ! Check it at The group focuses on
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00294.html (9,129 bytes)

4. LF: energy saving bulbs (score: 1)
Author: Peter Cleall <>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:33:35 +0000 (GMT)
A big thankyou to everyone who replied to my recent e-mails on energy saving bulbs. I sent the message to 3 different lists and received 31 replies. The general conclusion seems to be that the only i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-03/msg00234.html (10,127 bytes)

5. LF: energy saving bulbs (score: 1)
Author: Peter Cleall <>
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 14:53:29 +0000 (GMT)
For many years I have avoided using the energy saving bulbs under the impression that they were major RF pollutents. I am under increasing pressure to move to using these bulbs. Are my concerns still
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-03/msg00306.html (9,366 bytes)

6. LF: LF WSPRing (score: 1)
Author: Peter Cleall <>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:34:25 +0000 (GMT)
Is anyone planning to WSPR on 136 -137 kHz at anytime from now until Sunday evening. some advance info would be helpful If so can you let me know the days and rough timings. I have been experimenting
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-04/msg00055.html (8,275 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Re: wspr (score: 1)
Author: Peter Cleall <>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 11:44:23 +0000 (GMT)
I usually go to the wspr database on line and see what frequencies are being reported by others for the station I have heard. Then I average the reports and adjust my RX until it gives the average fi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00201.html (8,970 bytes)

8. LF: defence of WSPR Signals (score: 1)
Author: Peter Cleall <>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:17:33 +0000 (GMT)
I have always been interested in propagation. These WSPR signals are seen by some as repetitious rubbish. If you use , WSPR, the Internet database and your own receptions you soon realise that there
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00222.html (11,177 bytes)

9. Re: Re: LF: s/n shown by wspr .... what is it actually showing ? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Cleall <>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:43:15 +0000 (GMT)
a more fundamental question. at the bottom of the WSPR screen a red box has Rx Noise then a -dB number. What order of dBs do you normally see in here. regards peter == Dear Graham, LF Group, The SNR
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00324.html (9,997 bytes)

10. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 137.0k (score: 1)
Author: Peter Cleall <>
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:05:44 +0000 (GMT)
hi Jim, have not put your spots on the database as am seeing 3 signals from you in somerset 1346 -8 -1.6 0.136909 0 M0BMU IO91 23 1346 -24 -1.6 0.137009 0 M0BMU IO91 23 1346 -26 -1.6 0.137042 0 M0BMU
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00393.html (8,669 bytes)

11. Re: LF: Re: Re: s/n shown by wspr .... what is it actually showing ? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Cleall <>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:05:40 +0000 (GMT)
Thanks Jim for this observation and others for their feedback. When I first set up WSPR, in the days when the s/n button did not exist I ran a series of tests where I changed the level into the sound
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00603.html (10,907 bytes)

12. Re: LF: Re: WSPR (score: 1)
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 22:36:05 +0000
In addition to what James has said. Use of the WSPR site more fully can eliminate a lot of the uncertainties being discussed If more stations use the WSPR website/database for reporting then more con
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00343.html (13,161 bytes)

13. Re: LF: Re: 500kHz attenuation graphs? (score: 1)
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 10:56:11 +0000
Now back to 500kHz WSPRing.... 73s Roger G3XBM 2009/10/31 Alan Melia <> Hi Roger you will find that the late Reg Edwards programs GRNDWAV3 (I think) gives a very good idea of
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00496.html (12,752 bytes)

14. Re: LF: WSPR, QRSS, CW... (score: 1)
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:28:36 +0000
I suggest you go to Google and put "Alberto di Bene" in the search criteria before you critise and  beleive that failure to have a qso with you is  a failure to contribute to LF/MF regards peter G8AF
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-01/msg00419.html (14,785 bytes)

15. LF: eclipse (score: 1)
Author: "peter cleall" <>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 19:50:09 +0100
Is anyone planning any propagation experiments on136kHz or thereabouts during the eclipse next week. I have not yet decided whether to study it, visually or by radio techniques. Also if I stay at hom
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-08/msg00039.html (8,820 bytes)

16. LF: eclipse report (score: 1)
Author: "peter cleall" <>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 20:26:35 +0100
Thanks to everyone who commented on "Is anyone planning any propagation experiments on136kHz or there abouts during the eclipse next week". After your comments I decided to study it, visually and by
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-08/msg00100.html (9,282 bytes)

17. LF: leonids meteor shower (score: 1)
Author: "peter cleall" <>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 1999 10:26:34 +0100
this shower is due to peak in the early hours of 18 November. Although an annual shower, this year is the one that is expected to give a massive display, once every 33 years of maybe thousands of met
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-11/msg00011.html (7,902 bytes)

18. Re: LF: aurora propagation (score: 1)
Author: "peter cleall" <>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 21:15:36 +0100
Steve, slightly earlier in the evening I heard wideband noise across the LF band. I can best describe it as like bacon and eggs frying in a pan. I have now heard this 3 times in the last year and eac
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-11/msg00131.html (12,369 bytes)

19. LF: Re: 73kHz (score: 1)
Author: "peter cleall" <>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 13:59:48 +0100
Never previously considered listening to 73kHz due to the interference. Will probably take a half day off work tomorrow and see what is happening. who will be txing on which modes and what frequencie
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00364.html (8,225 bytes)

20. LF: 73 kHz tests (score: 1)
Author: "peter cleall" <>
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2000 09:18:06 +0100
Listened and viewed all morning. Nothing heard, A few very weak traces seen, between the 60kHz related lines. Rtty midband off for long periods and 60kHz on at all times, in spite of the pundits pred
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00027.html (7,780 bytes)

This search system is powered by Namazu