Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:


References: [ +from:: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: testing maillist (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Bowyer" <>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 11:02:19 +0100
I have not received any messages from the LF maillist for 2 days - including one I sent from John on Monday. Is there a problem? There was - it's fixed now. Peter G4MJS
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-06/msg00174.html (8,097 bytes)

2. LF: Duplicate messages (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Bowyer" <>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 07:13:39 +0100
Someone's system is resending rsgb_lf_group messages back to the list, causing a mail loop - I'm on the case. Sorry for any inconvenience. 73 Peter G4MJS
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-08/msg00140.html (7,662 bytes)

3. LF: Re: Re: Dangerous virus (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Bowyer" <>
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 1999 23:05:36 +0100
It's a hoax. Please don't perpetuate it. Peter G4MJS -- Original Message -- From: Dave To: rsgb_lf_
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-11/msg00027.html (10,549 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: TransAtlantic II, test notice - announcement (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Bowyer" <>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 23:01:32 +0100
I don't normally post here, but.... G3KEV wrote :- Secondary any other mode that one cares to use with their own antenna and commercial antenna farms are totally non amateur radio. Why so intolerant?
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00143.html (10,607 bytes)

5. LF: Re: Experimentation etc (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Bowyer" <>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 20:37:26 +0100
Changed the subject line - nothing at all to do with Transatlantic II ... I am glad Peter that you have joined the debate and I know that you have to be impartial at all times. Well.. not really, I'm
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00163.html (16,025 bytes)

6. LF: Re: changing opinions (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Bowyer" <>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 11:25:40 +0100
I think the second posting was an attempt at sarcasm. Unsurprising that it was lost on an international audience. It's a shame that posters here feel they have to resort to that kind of language to m
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00232.html (9,186 bytes)

7. LF: Large attachments (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Bowyer" <>
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 16:13:30 +0100
Folks Several people have tried to send some huge files to the rsgb_lf_group reflector in the past couple of days - for your info, nothing bigger than 40k bytes will be accepted, anything bigger is h
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00040.html (8,020 bytes)

8. LF: and - resolved (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Bowyer" <>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 10:41:51 +0100
After conversations with Al K3TKJ, we have finally resolved the problems we were having delivering to addresses. We were tripping Al's spam filters and as a result, our mail relay was blocked
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-09/msg00166.html (8,040 bytes)

This search system is powered by Namazu