Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 536 ]

Total 536 documents matching your query.

301. LF: 2200m started with a bang, but... (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 08:02:10 -0400
When I decoded 2E0ILY a full 30 minutes before sunset I thought it was going to be a remarkable night. It was not. I decoded Chris a few more times early on, and was decoded twice by G0LUJ. 137.550 h
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-10/msg00223.html (12,304 bytes)

302. LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] 2200m started with a bang, but... (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 11:22:20 -0400
Hi Chris, I don't have any suggestions. With WSPR, Opera and EbNaut sharing the same small band segment, things are a bit tight if you ask me. But I don't live in Europe with the likes of DCF39 to co
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-10/msg00225.html (13,831 bytes)

303. Re: LF: 2200m started with a bang, but... (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 11:28:22 -0400
Indeed. It failed to consider how hard it is to defeat BUGs. :-) AUI? Sometimes I think these interference sources are driven by artificial intelligence and on a seek-and-destroy mission, but it's pr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-10/msg00226.html (12,689 bytes)

304. Re: LF: WSPR 475 kHz (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 05:33:13 -0400
I think with solar minimum conditions have improved. I am hearing stations at great distance who have been active all along, but only recently have I been hearing them. For example, VK4YB at 15819 km
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00004.html (12,089 bytes)

305. Re: LF: WSPR 475 kHz (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2018 13:31:05 -0400
I have insufficient personal experience with 475/137 kHz to know for sure... With a few solar cycles of experience at 1.8 MHz I can say for sure propagation is **MUCH** better at solar minimum, espec
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00021.html (14,529 bytes)

306. Re: LF: VO1NA (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2018 20:39:50 -0400
Hi Joe, I wish I could listen for your CW but I have shut down operations for the night. We have high winds and power interruptions were causing reboots of the computer that hosts the SDRs for LF and
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00032.html (14,259 bytes)

307. Re: LF: WSPR 475 kHz (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2018 05:06:55 -0500
Hi Alan, That is an interesting comment. In my years DXing on 1.8 MHz I notice something similar. Quite consistently when Kp is very low for several days, propagation becomes poor (with the possible
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00037.html (15,606 bytes)

308. Re: LF: WSPR 475 kHz (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2018 05:22:16 -0500
Likewise for me, Mike. I do know that in 1.9 the improvements were mainly at LF and MF, by taking advantage of the phase stability of signals at these frequencies. My tests showed more advantage at
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00039.html (13,250 bytes)

309. Re: LF: VO1NA (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2018 05:58:59 -0500
Hi Joe, Sorry about the coil heating difficulties. Is this something new? I need to investigate my system for heating. I see a small but consistent change in apparent antenna system resistance during
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00040.html (16,351 bytes)

310. LF: Good conditions EA5DOM 2E0ILY VO1NA (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 06:50:49 -0500
There was a some improvement last night following onset of a geomagnetic disturbance. MF did not seem measurably better except for DK7FC peaking a few dB better S/N compared to previous nights, but L
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00057.html (12,133 bytes)

311. LF: SL FTP upload (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 05:58:14 -0500
Hi LF, I am trying to set up two SpecLab instances as grabbers to monitor the EU and NA LF QRSS windows, but I am having some problems with FTP upload. Either SpecLab instance works fine by itself, c
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00076.html (12,254 bytes)

312. Re: LF: SL FTP upload (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 13:41:47 -0500
Hi Markus, Thank you! I will try the simple solution tonight. If necessary I will use the timer. I didn't quite understand all that from the SpecLab help but you have explained it very clearly and si
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00081.html (14,351 bytes)

313. Re: LF: SL FTP upload (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 05:50:23 -0500
Hello Wolf, Thanks for the reply. I am a novice, but I really like Spectrum Lab! Sometimes (often) I get lost reading the help. It is very well written but there is so much capability I don't always
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00089.html (15,706 bytes)

314. LF: New QRSS / DFCW grabbers (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 06:02:06 -0500
Hi LF artists, I invite you to try painting something on my new grabbers. I hope to have these running all the time, monitoring the EU and NA LF QRSS windows. The grabbers are located at my home stat
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00090.html (12,371 bytes)

315. LF: also... regarding SL captures (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 06:38:24 -0500
I will read again the help but so far I didn't figure out if I can do this... I would like to upload for example lf2.jpg via FTP every 5 or 10 minutes, but I would like to save a local archive copy o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00091.html (11,681 bytes)

316. Re: LF: LF JT-9 ? (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 06:14:15 -0500
Hi Stefan, LF, Too for for me on JT9 but I will be happy to do a DFCW QSO later. :-) I have a bit of work to do but soon I will be ready for CW, JT9, DFCW (and as a last resort QRSS) again. I do have
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00102.html (13,719 bytes)

317. Re: LF: Italy in Eu slot (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 16:12:44 -0500
Very good! I hope it will be possible to see these signals on my side! If I see either of them starting to come in while I am awake, I will pause my transmissions and try to get a full call sign copy
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00109.html (12,061 bytes)

318. Re: LF: JT9-2 and JT9-5 mode application (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 16:57:45 -0500
Hello Rik, I am very interested in this! Thank you very much for your work! Tomorrow I will download the program. I think we badly need these slow modes for the average LF operators (which is most of
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00114.html (16,283 bytes)

319. Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: LF: JT9-2 and JT9-5 mode application (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 17:42:18 -0500
Hi Rik, I do not know the symbol lengths for JT9 slow and I do not know how it compares to WSPR about frequency stability requirements. gets across the pond when WSPR2 cannot. Clearly for WSPR mode,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00116.html (19,213 bytes)

320. LF: Poor condx LF (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 05:53:13 -0500
I did not see either of the Italians on QRSS. I received only 3 TA WSPR spots from EB8ARZ/2. This is below average for the past couple of weeks. Keep the QRSS activity coming! Better conditions will
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00122.html (10,667 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu