Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:: 536 ]

Total 536 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Mar 25-26 Best QRB/reports (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 07:22:07 -0400
I'm more interested in WSPR15 vs WSPR2 vs OP32 :-) What are the ideas about this? I believe WSPR15 is better against WSPR2 on LF for long distances in the usual propagation Hi Alex. I am very intere
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00211.html (10,618 bytes)

2. Re: LF: DF2JP in the Eu slot - DF6NM too (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <>
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 05:28:37 -0400
OPERA (I think, if I have it set up properly) on LF. Pretty much plug and play Paul , As long as the recovered tone falls inside the decoder pass band , can be set 1500 Hz or 2000 Hz mid band , notin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00068.html (10,371 bytes)

3. LF: Last night results and intro (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <>
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 06:13:26 -0400
Hello LFers, Last night I had what could probably be considered a full call sign from DF2JP on DFCW. I got all the characters of DF6NM but not all at the same time. What is considered valid copy of a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00069.html (10,717 bytes)

4. Re: LF: DF2JP in the Eu slot - DF6NM too (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <>
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 18:48:10 -0400
I am running Opera on 136 only. To run on 477 would require me to stop monitoring WSPR2 to QSY the receiver, which I do not want to do. I see, thanks for explaining that the speed and decoder is link
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00079.html (12,322 bytes)

5. LF: last night (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 08:43:09 -0400
I had partial copy of DF6NM on DFCW last night in the 0000z hour. Very bright trace on the 6 and N but QSB took out the rest. Around the same time (0033z) I had a Opera decode of DF2JP. Shortly after
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00086.html (8,590 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Wilkinson combiners - More (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 08:35:42 -0400
I've been reading all this with great interest as I too am hoping to combine two LF PAs. On those fickle N1BUG contacts -- Yes, more and more so I fear. It's a subject for another thread but some key
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00114.html (11,419 bytes)

7. Re: LF: 136 OP32 LAST 24HR (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 21:10:26 -0400
2017-04-12 06 :48:30 DF2JP AA N1BUG FN55MF 0 136 -40 Op32__~40dB I don't understand Opera very well... But, I think this was a decode??? On my screen, using opera 1.6.4 in the lower pane it was in re
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00132.html (9,883 bytes)

8. Re: LF: 136 OP32 LAST 24HR (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 07:29:31 -0400
Thanks for the additional explanations Graham. That helps clarify things for me. I had five full decodes of 2E0ILY last night with no more than 5% fade on the worse of them. Looks like Opera is going
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00169.html (11,217 bytes)

9. Re: LF: 136 OP32 last 24 Hr (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 13:20:43 -0400
Oh my ! 2E0ILY is making improvements, I best set to work building that attenuator to protect my receiver... ;-) I realize one cannot directly compare S/N reported by different modes in different sof
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00185.html (12,188 bytes)

10. Re: LF: 136 OP32 LAST 24HR (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 08:51:43 -0400
Yes Graham, Down to one spot last night. I'm a bit confused though (my usual state). The decode last night occurred at 00:55 but your info shows 02:50. Why or how does that happen? This is not the fi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00200.html (12,421 bytes)

11. Re: LF: 136 op32 last 24 hrs (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <>
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 08:59:49 -0400
Nothing showing for n1bug in the data base this time , Impossible conditions here with noise floor +20 dB or more. This storm to my west produces so much lightning it's a steady roar, no breaks at al
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00229.html (9,050 bytes)

12. LF: Monitoring 2190m WSPR (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 18:16:24 -0400
I finally have my LF receiving setup active again. K2ORS is very audible 24 hours a day. I spotted WH2XND (on 138.000 WSPR) 99 times the first night back and 113 times the second night, so things see
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-10/msg00201.html (8,274 bytes)

13. Re: LF: RE: Monitoring 2190m WSPR (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 06:14:41 -0400
Hi Mal, Not much activity planned on 630, though I may listen there for the next several nights. We have a big storm system coming this way that is already making too much noise on LF. 73, Paul LOOKI
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-10/msg00204.html (8,943 bytes)

14. Re: LF: Monitoring 2190m WSPR (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 06:08:33 -0400
I was very happy to provide your first TA report on MF in the previous season, Alberto. I hope we can do it on LF this time! I am continuing to monitor LF WSPR every night. So far I am only hearing t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-10/msg00268.html (12,600 bytes)

15. Re: LF: Monitoring 2190m WSPR (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 06:23:31 -0400
I wish it were possible to have more WSPR-15 activity on LF. It seems like a very promising mode and would be much more interesting to me than Op32. Unfortunately for many of us the old WSPR-X softwa
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-10/msg00269.html (12,634 bytes)

16. Re: LF: Monitoring 2190m WSPR (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 11:26:58 -0400
Thanks Jay. I am far from knowledgeable about these materials but that agrees with measured performance of several receive bandpass filters I built for LF/MF last winter. I tried several different fe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-10/msg00275.html (10,932 bytes)

17. Re: LF: Monitoring 2190m WSPR (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 11:48:02 -0400
Hello Chris, It seems WSPR-X is "conditionally stable". We had a fair bit of discussion about it on this side of the pond last winter. It works for some, but for others it doesn't. For me it stops do
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-10/msg00277.html (14,217 bytes)

18. Re: LF: EA5DOM Back to LF ..... (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 06:54:36 -0400
That is great news, Luis. I am happy you are QRV again. I am monitoring LF WSPR-2 every night. Hope to receive you soon! Last season I received DC0DX, G8HUH, and 2E0ILY on LF WSPR-2. Last night DCF39
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-11/msg00013.html (9,205 bytes)

19. Re: LF: EA5DOM Back to LF ..... (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 05:31:04 -0400
Propagation seemed good but I had heavy QRN from approaching storm here last night. 73, Paul N1BUG, WI2XTC Anyway it was a sourprise to get 30 stations reporting my signal in WSPR-2 LF. Or maybe anou
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-11/msg00024.html (10,550 bytes)

20. LF: PA problem (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 17:33:07 -0500
I wonder if anyone can help me with this. I built one of these: http://qrp-labs.com/ultimate3/u3mods/lfamp.html It's not what I want but it's what I can afford. In all cases, I was driving it with 25
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-11/msg00063.html (9,882 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu