Hello Bob, Interesting to see that the low noise today is at least "Europe wide" :-) Perhaps even Worldwide ??? I wonder if you publish your spectogram's online somewhere ? I think I did not see you
Hello Alan, Tnx for info ! It is so simple, but I did not thought about this. I thought it has more to do with low lightning levels or static's. It is still difficult for me to connect a link between
Hello Stefan, VLF I see that signal here (in Appingedam) to ! Must be something worldwide. http://home.deds.nl/~knol/test.jpg Peter, PA1SDB www.qsl.net/pa1sdb VLF, There have been some changes on my
Hello VLF. Just a experience message ! It seems that there is somewhere a perfect setting in "Width of FFT-bin", but where ? Measurements below in SL by noise and peak: 47 uHz - DJ8WX = noise -157 /
Hello Uwe, VLF That solar flare, with a maximum X-ray flux of X4.97 peaked at 00:49 is not visible at your signal in my spectogram's, Uwe. I know, Sun was at other side of earth in relation to our QT
Not recognisable here that W :-( Try a 0.005 Hz sine pattern over 12 h ! (dont ask me how:-) -- Original Message -- From: [email protected][email protected] To: rsgb_lf_group@blackshee
Hello Jim, Just in coincidence I was already operating V2.79 B10 [3], but it works perfect here. I use that SKM52 that G0UPL sell's at his website. It has a pin out with only a 1 PPS output. Befor I
Hi Uwe, Somehow, I don't receive my own messages via the reflector. Still no mail (2 missing) here, but that one from U did arrive here prompt ?!?!?!?!?! But..... I think you have to figure out a mod
Hello Eddie, There are no breaks here. Was there a break in your SR-cal source ? Yes, all windows here show a constant carrier, but very short breaks now an then. Not as long as in your 424 uHz windo
On 25/2 there is no 009 I try 26/2 (what I see here) 012 008 005 014 space 003 space 009 Peter. -- Original Message -- From: [email protected][email protected] To: rsgb_lf_group@blacks
Tnx Wolf for the quick explanation ! Perhaps 100uHz is the limit here, or perhaps 30 uHz. Experiment continues :-) -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] wolf_dl4yhf To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksh
Stefan, Horst, VLF. In my opinion technicaly the focus on the transmission has to be at 1F (filters, antenna's, mailings) As in the Amateur radio operator humane focus of view, the harmonic suppressi
Uwe, Looks like that this transmission of this evening is abt. -3dB stronger in relation to the night transmission at 22/23 Feb. Right now a saturized trace, it wasn't that bright 22/23. 73's, Peter
That is how I do that, but now pickup wire, but some R's that make analog loop back into mike input. Testing for day's now at 8270.015 Hz -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] uwe-jan
Markus, It looks like there is a bright pixel visible in my 47 uHz window. Looks like it is just 0.0001 Hz above 8270.002 Hz... PA1SDB, Peter. -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Markus
Hello Uwe, Your relative signal level is now also live visible here: http://home.deds.nl/~knol/plot.jpg Or here http://www.qsl.net/pa1sdb/ at the end of that page ! Well... actualy due _expression_ "
Markus, Uwe, VLF Optimal is here (Appingedam) at midnight, and almost fading out at noon. Distance 190 km PA1SDB, www.qsl.net/pa1sdb -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Markus Vester To
Hello Stefan, Uwe, VLF, Most grabbers show a increase of signal level on 8270.005 Hz last night. Seems that re-tuning the wires was vy usefull. 73's, Peter - PA1SDB www.qsl.net/pa1sdb The background
