Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 409 ]

Total 409 documents matching your query.

41. Re: LF: Packet Cluster (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 09:23:16 +0100
G3YMC wrote: The packet cluster reports given by Mike G3XDV are, I think, from the internet based version of the packet cluster. This is totally seperate from the VHF packet cluster network in the UK
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-05/msg00067.html (9,450 bytes)

42. Re: LF: [Fwd: 137 RTTY & AMRAD Beacon] (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 12:32:02 +0100
Ah, that's very useful. I heard it at S9+10dB last weekend at 0230UTC - this is the strongest heard so far and is as good as the Greek RTTY signal ever gets. What would be really useful is someone w
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-05/msg00072.html (9,585 bytes)

43. LF: Weekend report 29-31 May (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 09:05:52 +0100
Tuesday - Friday 26 - 28 May Skeds with IK1ODO using QRSs. Very bad storms in Italy and some nights also bad in UK. Saw Marco on Wed and Fri, but no QSO. Saturday Saturday 29 May Bad QRN all day. Hea
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-06/msg00001.html (8,849 bytes)

44. LF: Weekend report 6/7 June (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 1999 15:19:47 +0100
Saturday 6 June Low local noise and static. Heard G3YXM (599); G3BDQ (58/99); G6RO (539). Worked GW4ALG (559/569). Sunday 7 June Mostly very low local noise all day Sked with IK1ODO using QRSs but no
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-06/msg00036.html (8,632 bytes)

45. LF: Weekend Report 12/12 June (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 12:18:12 +0100
A good weekend (at least the mornings). A new country heard and four new stations received. Saturday 12 June Very low noise level in morning then S9+10dB QRM from neighbour's computer 1100 - 2130. Go
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-06/msg00074.html (9,535 bytes)

46. Re: LF: DSP? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 09:28:20 +0100
OK1FIG wrote: We are probably damned to fight agains QRN and QRM. Recently I had opportunity to buy an external DSP device. I wonder what the experience of DSP users are. Certainly it is great to hav
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-06/msg00089.html (9,912 bytes)

47. LF: Re: Operating times (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 10:00:42 +0100
Lets resume the discussion about a talk back frequency and a special operation time as df2py suggested. I am not sure if there was an agreement. I have been puzzled by the call for special operating
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-06/msg00102.html (9,928 bytes)

48. Re: LF: Disruptiopn ahead at blacksheep.org (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 14:14:57 +0100
To all blacksheep.org mailing list members There will be some disruption over this weekend as we're working to migrate the blacksheep.org services onto new servers - should be all done by Sunday even
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-06/msg00112.html (8,776 bytes)

49. LF: weekend report 19/20 June (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 14:11:12 +0100
Saturday 19 June Very bad local QRM, mostly S9 white noise all over band. Heard G4GVC (599); G3YXM (599) and G3OLB (589). Saw on Spectrogram (which was less affected by the noise) QRSs signals from O
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-06/msg00119.html (8,944 bytes)

50. LF: Antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 14:27:21 +0100
I have done very many antenna experiments over the past 2-3 years to get a better signal at 73 and 136kHz from a small garden. I have experimented with inverted-L Marconis. These have mainly sloped d
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-06/msg00120.html (10,134 bytes)

51. LF: Spectrogram 5 (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 14:33:26 +0100
I downloaded Spectrogram 5 yesterday and have done a few experiments with it. It seems that the best improvement is the custom colours on the display. This is not just the look of the thing - it is w
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-06/msg00121.html (8,542 bytes)

52. LF: ERP Calculations (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 14:53:04 +0100
Thanks to all who have given me advice on inverted-L top sections, and to Dick, PA0SE, who pointed me in the direction of the Admiralty Handbook (Dick, if you have not yet sent the copy, do not bothe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-06/msg00138.html (10,343 bytes)

53. LF: More on Rr (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 15:19:22 +0100
Further to my note on Radiation Resistance formulas, the highly respected 160m expert ON4UN uses 1450 instead of "160 (or 60) multiplied by pi squared" in his excellent book Low Band DXing. This figu
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-06/msg00140.html (8,325 bytes)

54. Re: LF: ERP Calculations (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 10:17:07 +0100
Pure mathematical the radiation resistance of a short (in wavelength) vertical monopole above a perfect ground is : Ra = 40 . Pi^2 . l^2 / L^2 where Pi = 3.1415... , l = antenna-length , L = waveleng
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-06/msg00152.html (10,428 bytes)

55. LF: Spacer (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:04:00 +0100
Since the radio was so noisy this weekend, I spent time both improving the transmitted power and getting a better idea of the real antenna current. I finally managed to get 1.7A into my inverted-L fr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-06/msg00166.html (8,841 bytes)

56. LF: Weekend Report 26.27 June (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:53:06 +0100
Another extremely noisy weekend so spent the time usefully improving my signal. Saturday 26 June Local noise S9 all day. Heard G4GVC (599). Very bad QRN added to the QRM by lunch time so gave up. Imp
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-06/msg00167.html (8,956 bytes)

57. Re: LF: Field strength measurement....Rik (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:45:35 +0100
Alan Melia wrote: I have been grappling with the idea that I need to know how good (or how bad!) my antenna is on reception. After several months of listening and slight changes I know it isn't good
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-06/msg00168.html (10,069 bytes)

58. Re: LF: field strength measurement again (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 16:06:29 +0100
G3NYK wrote: To Mike yes I do use the steady signals of the 'beacons' for tests, but what does S9 mean?? Its a strong signal but is it 10uV/m or 1V/m. Most of the radios I have have S-meter sensitivi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-07/msg00010.html (10,180 bytes)

59. LF: Activity report 29/6 - 4/7 (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 1999 09:21:01 +0100
Rather heavy going this week with high static levels but managed some QSOs. Tuesday 29 June First time QSO with PA0CC (gave 559; got 439). Wednesday 30 June QSO with G3AQC (gave 589; got 559 - 2 S-po
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-07/msg00018.html (9,054 bytes)

60. LF: Spectrogram (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 1999 09:25:49 +0100
Having been initially enthusiastic about the latest version of Spectrogram, I have tried it on several real signals (only tested it on weak carriers before) and I have now gone back to the previous v
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-07/msg00019.html (8,763 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu