Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 409 ]

Total 409 documents matching your query.

141. LF: Weekend Report 14-16 Jan (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 18:34:25 +0100
Friday 14 January On 73kHz again. Worked M0BMU who had improved his antenna (gave 599, got 589), and G0MRF (559/459) at 45km for my fifth two-way QSO on the band. Transmitted QRSs (4s dots) afterward
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00200.html (9,052 bytes)

142. LF: More small sigs (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 14:15:57 +0100
Yesterday, I mentioned that I had heard IK5ZPV when the local noise suddenly went down to the lowest I had ever heard it. I forgot to say that I also heard CFH at S2 - and this was 2030UTC or 3.30 lo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00220.html (7,901 bytes)

143. LF: Selectivity (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 12:22:37 +0100
Interested in the discussions about roofing filters. When I was using a ferrite rod antenna on 73kHz, it had a useful bandwidth of less than 1kHz and needed to be re-tuned for different parts of the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00252.html (8,014 bytes)

144. Re: LF: DCF39 heard in the US (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 18:40:29 +0100
Dave Wilson, AC4IU, who lives near Fredericksburg, south of Washington DC, reports to have seen DFC39, but rarely, and adds that he is not sure what determines when he can hear that station of not. I
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00286.html (11,713 bytes)

145. Re: LF: 8 kHz loading coil (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 11:31:41 +0100
I have an idea of resonating my existing vertical on 8 kHz. Is there a practical way to construct a 600 mH loading coil, withstanding 3-4 A and high voltage? Any *large* toroids on the market?' /Chri
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00362.html (9,136 bytes)

146. Re: LF: 73 kHz. (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2000 10:49:56 +0100
I would like to thank all the listeners for reports on the 73 kHz signals. I managed good contacts with G3YXM, M0BMU and G3LDO. Maybe we could designate Friday night as 73 kHz Test Night, to try and
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00038.html (9,219 bytes)

147. Re: LF: 73kHz / Soundcards (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2000 17:48:18 +0100
A noise level -45dB relative to the carrier, within a few 100Hz of the carrier is probably pretty good performance, or at least not a major fault - after all, there is bound to be some ripple, and -4
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00049.html (8,585 bytes)

148. LF: Weekend report 5/6 Feb (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2000 13:33:44 +0100
Saturday 5 February Located fault on LF station - actually two faults which was why it wasn't easy to find in the dark! The variometer coil had a disconnection in the middle where it was tapped, and
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00091.html (8,817 bytes)

149. Re: LF: Weekend new ones (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2000 13:10:34 +0100
G4GVC wrote: . . . .. . the contact I had with HB9DCE at 10.43UT on Sunday morning. He called on my frequency as I finished a contact with DK5PT, and seemed rather surprised when I responded, althoug
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00099.html (9,368 bytes)

150. Re: LF: ERP and field strength again (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 18:12:45 +0100
. . . . . . G3XDV's signal could probably be measured from within the university though - how about it Mike? Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU Any time. It may also shed light on the interesting anomoly
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00115.html (8,776 bytes)

151. LF: Weekend Report 11-13 Feb (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 12:29:27 +0100
Friday 11 February Went on 73kHz for "Friday night is activity night", and found noise level fairly low at S7. Worked M0BMU (gave 599, got 589). No-one else heard. Put out numerous normal and slow CW
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00145.html (10,158 bytes)

152. Re: LF: Re: Weekend Report 11-13 Feb (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 13:00:25 +0100
I also found Toni's signal barely copyable Sunday morning when John and Dave were giving him good reports, something I have also experienced before. Whatever the state of Toni's chaos antenna at the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00156.html (9,737 bytes)

153. Re: LF: One Week Later, and more.... (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:46:00 +0100
It's also available on my web site from the Links page. Mike, G3XDV (IO91VT) http://www.dennison.demon.co.uk/activity.htm
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00205.html (9,355 bytes)

154. Re: LF: DX Cluster spots for Feb 19/20 on GB7DXM (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:52:31 +0100
To Alan, Cesare appears to have a rather interesting oscillator - a bit like the one I used to use. So his transmission drifts and wobbles by a few Hz. This has the advantage that it is easily recogn
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00206.html (9,598 bytes)

155. Re: LF: Aurora warning (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 10:44:30 +0100
Aurora expected on VHF tonight (21st), so watch 136kHz toward the north ! 73, Rik ON7YD I have subscribed to the IPS Flare Information service described on this reflector, and the warnings say: IPS F
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00218.html (9,754 bytes)

156. Re: LF: Re: Beacon Tests. (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 14:51:01 +0100
A string of dashes, for example 00000000, is the next best thing. Mike, G3XDV (IO91VT) http://www.dennison.demon.co.uk/activity.htm
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00240.html (9,068 bytes)

157. Re: LF: 73kHz on Friday? / Field strength (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 15:08:04 +0100
M0BMU wrote: Last Friday I was QRV on 73kHz between about 2100 and 2300 utc - didn't hear/see anyone else though. This was a pity because the Rugby TX was transmitting only two unmodulated carriers,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00245.html (9,006 bytes)

158. Re: LF: Re: Beacon Tests. (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 17:02:51 +0100
Ahh - are those "O" symbols the letter "O" or the number "0?" -;) They are zeros. A string of zeros is the nearest an unmodified keyer can get to a continuous carrier, and will still take some advant
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00250.html (9,327 bytes)

159. LF: Weekend report 26/27 Feb (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 14:33:43 +0100
Saturday 26 February Low noise level and conditions good. Greek RTTY S8 and CFH S4 at 0830. Heard G3OLB (599); GM3YXM/P (569); G4GVC (599); G6RO (559); PA0SE (579); OE5ODL (329) country number 18 hea
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00293.html (8,495 bytes)

160. LF: Flare (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 13:44:54 +0100
An X-class (biggest) solar flare occurred this morning at about 0830UTC, with an M-class flare just afterwards. The A index is still low at about 20 - it was over 50 when Larry had the good reception
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-03/msg00011.html (7,748 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu