Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 268 ]

Total 268 documents matching your query.

21. R: RE: LF: VLF with two small loops. (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 15:31:59 +0100 (CET)
Hi Louis, thanks for the new grabber link just added it in the list! By the way since 2 days I'm active on MF wspr getting plenty of reports including yours ;-) The antenna is the same used at LF (of
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-01/msg00066.html (9,234 bytes)

22. R: Re: VLF: Carrier on 8270.0025 Hz (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 13:09:02 +0100 (CET)
ehm just for fate, my work has to do with noise and thermal insulation... do you need a sample of our famous Schallschluck? :-) Marco IK1HSS Carrier stopped 00:05 UTC. Am 16.01.2017 00:42, schrieb DK
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-01/msg00136.html (8,961 bytes)

23. R: LF: CT/G3KEV (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 19:32:55 +0100 (CET)
Hi Mal, unfortunately I guess is not an easy task on MF... the mast is generally grounded (ehm in the sea..) because is electrically connected to the ballst bulb for lightening safety so you have to
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-01/msg00143.html (9,068 bytes)

24. R: LF: First TA decode in MF Opera 8 ? (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 14:36:14 +0100 (CET)
Hi MF Very interesting night ! Combining WSPR and Opera8 transmissions I have been able to get decodes in both modes from USA last night Mainly because now we have a US station using Opera There was
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-01/msg00239.html (9,150 bytes)

25. R: Re: VLF: First detection DL -> RU on 8.27 kHz (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:10:45 +0100 (CET)
Congrats to Alex for the fine RXsetup. Congrats to Stefan for the new achievement!!! :-))) 73 Marco ...just in case that someone didn't receive Alex' mail, here one of the best of the images that wer
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-01/msg00280.html (9,473 bytes)

26. R: Re: ULF: 5 wavelengths on the 101 km band? Valid or not? (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 19:26:36 +0100 (CET)
My opinion is probably not valuable... but I guess that your winding work was worth Stefan! :-) Compliments to you Stefan and compliments to the ears of Renato! It's is really looking for the first 5
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-02/msg00104.html (10,498 bytes)

27. R: Re: ULF: 5 wavelengths on the 101 km band? Valid or not? (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 11:10:17 +0100 (CET)
Hi Stefan, where do you qsy next? :-) the dreamer band is now no longer a dream ;- ) are you winding a new coil for 77 Hz band? gosh.. 3800 km of wavelenght! Leaving the jokes .. again compliments fo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-02/msg00110.html (10,259 bytes)

28. LF: wonder opening on long path? (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 19:31:14 +0100 (CET)
or an april fooling in advance???? ;-) 4 spots: Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az 2017-02-19 17:40 EA5DOM 0.475608 -22 0 IM98xn 1 WA7JAY DM12lt 9756 311 2017-02-19 17:44 IK1H
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-02/msg00183.html (8,280 bytes)

29. R: Re: LF: QRSS10 477.7 KHz (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2017 09:30:02 +0200 (CEST)
Hi Joe, me too.. we could set up a FET&Chips boot somewhere ;-) After long time of reliable operations, the smoke went out of my LF PA. Now after several replacements I started scraping my head becau
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00009.html (8,427 bytes)

30. LF: Happy Easter MF LF VLF (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 19:39:59 +0200 (CEST)
Best wishes to all the group. A special one to Chris and his brave FEts ;-) Tonite while the QRP TX is on on MF, a couple of proud FET will challenge for the last time on my QRO TX: will apply low DC
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00216.html (9,453 bytes)

31. R: Re: LF: Happy Easter MF LF VLF (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 09:28:56 +0200 (CEST)
Hi Chris :-) I guess that finally found what was wrong with my PA! The last available FET survived to the test yesterday and the only thing warming is the dummy load :-) This morning will stop sendin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-04/msg00235.html (10,464 bytes)

32. R: Re: LF: NA VLF (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 09:13:03 +0200 (CEST)
Hi Joe! compliments for the amazing result! It is really amazing what you are doing on both side of the pond! 73 Marco, IK1HSS Thank-you Paul. Your RX setup and processing are fantastic. 2.6 electron
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00094.html (11,085 bytes)

33. R: Re: LF: RE: Combining LF amps revisited (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 16:41:56 +0200 (CEST)
Chris, I guess there is a little misstyping in the calculation performed from Clemens on the DJ5IL tool.... he entered 2.5 instead of 25 in the impedance box: the primary winding after the combiner s
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00151.html (11,071 bytes)

34. R: Re: R: Re: LF: RE: Combining LF amps revisited (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 19:40:31 +0200 (CEST)
Hello Chris, happy to read that increasing the turn number you can make the life easier to the toroids ;-) (the FETs also enjoy hi). I'm not a professional, but using the formula and taking care of r
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00155.html (11,169 bytes)

35. R: Re: R: Re: R: Re: LF: RE: Combining LF amps revisited (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 20:42:13 +0200 (CEST)
Hello Chris, Hello Clemens, thanks for the confirmation, softwares are wonderful but is always better have a rough idea of the possible resoult and check it ;-) anyway if he will have an update it is
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00177.html (10,794 bytes)

36. R: Re: VLF: EbNaut tonite, 'SMS' via VLF (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 20:00:18 +0200 (CEST)
Oh dear :-) would like to propose a law for sending SMS only by EbNaut on LF/VLF: it would be so nice!!!! Leaving the jokes and my personal opinion on cells and related matter.. You are doing a wonde
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00227.html (9,594 bytes)

37. R: RE: LF: Iron dust toroids and heating (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 20:15:33 +0200 (CEST)
Hello Chris, Hello Clemens, wish to share a couples of mumblings.. I don't know if the saturation formula used calculating B on transformers is valid also for inductors.. probably we should ask some
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00228.html (12,111 bytes)

38. R: RE: RE: LF: Iron dust toroids and heating (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 10:40:14 +0200 (CEST)
Hallo Clem, und vielen Dank für die Erklärung :-) Hi Marco, It is indeed. B =V/ (4.44*F*N*A) No,but I was referring to V across L2, not across the load. See the three attached spice simulations. 73 C
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00232.html (13,925 bytes)

39. R: LF: Re: I: Fw: For today the FETs survived... (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 19:48:20 +0200 (CEST)
uhuh... a slightly silly misleading assumption... Vdc are the same of Vrms before FETs make their work! Thank you Andy for pointing out it!! With this approach calculation changes a bit and probably
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00268.html (12,512 bytes)

40. R: Re: LF: Re: I: Fw: For today the FETs survived... (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 14:03:13 +0200 (CEST)
Hi Andy, and thanks for thinking to my FETs :-) Indeed I made 2 trials, the first with the 5T/12T xfmr and then changed a bit the ratio but I got about the same kind of resoults. Now I have a new xfm
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00286.html (17,338 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu