Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:


References: [ +from:: 64 ]

Total 64 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Hummmm (score: 1)
Author: "Hugh M0WYE" <>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 12:44:39 +0100
Hi Group, Like many just starting out with LF, I'm using an audio amplifier to transmit with. I had a bit of a surprise when tinkering about with it. I had connected a loudspeaker to the output and p
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-01/msg00012.html (9,150 bytes)

2. LF: Jan-Martin's Preamp circuit (score: 1)
Author: "Hugh M0WYE" <>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 15:14:17 +0100
Hi Jan-Martin and LF group, I was going to ask if your preamp could be posted on the Reflector ... Being the "some-other" Here it is ... 73 Hugh M0WYE Hi, I don't see the point in using NPN devices (
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-01/msg00042.html (10,881 bytes)

3. LF: Re: Re: Notch for DCF39/Spectrograms/Luxembourg effect (score: 1)
Author: "Hugh" <>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 21:04:42 +0100
Hi Jim, Thankyou for your contribution on the notch filter. Also for the idea about the "Luxemborg effect". I notice the sounds and patterning on the screen are only there during the hours of darknes
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-01/msg00050.html (9,063 bytes)

4. LF: PA0BWL received at M0WYE (score: 1)
Author: "Hugh" <>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 21:03:47 +0100
Hi PA0BWL I don't know if you monitor this reflector, but if you do you were an excellent signal here at Wye, Near Ashford. JO01LE. I answered your QRSS CQ call just before 13:00, but I don't think y
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-01/msg00051.html (8,004 bytes)

5. LF: More about the Notch Filter (score: 1)
Author: "Hugh" <>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 00:31:40 +0100
Hi Alan, LF Group, I found out why the pot setting was so critical. I measued the value for best notch and it was about 330 ohms ! I have replaced the 25k with a 1k pot and it is much better behaved.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-01/msg00105.html (9,440 bytes)

6. LF: Re: Re: QRSS transmission tonight (score: 1)
Author: "Hugh M0WYE" <>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:34:08 +0100
Thankyou, Ian, I'll start around 20:00 and carry on 'til after 21:00. I shall use QRSS3, I don't think the signal source is stable enough for anything more. (I'm still waiting for Farnell to deliver
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-01/msg00137.html (9,444 bytes)

7. LF: QRSS transmission tonight (score: 1)
Author: "Hugh M0WYE" <>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:35:16 +0100
Hi All, I did some test transmissions over the weekend, and I seem to be able to radiate some sort of signal now. I will send some CQs in the QRSS part of the band around 20:00 tonight, and will of c
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-01/msg00145.html (8,865 bytes)

8. LF: Argo 132 (score: 1)
Author: "Hugh M0WYE" <>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 10:08:36 +0100
Hello Alberto, The explorer style dialogue works well. Thankyou for fixing it so quickly. I like the date too. (which comes out as day, month, year ... even though "MMM,DD,YY" appears on the screen m
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-01/msg00251.html (9,706 bytes)

9. LF: Loran (score: 1)
Author: "Hugh M0WYE" <>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 12:02:06 +0100
Thanks John, for a very useful frequency list of Loran stations. They make quite good frequency markers - like radio graph paper. I wonder if anyone can answer my three questions ... 1. How does Lora
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-02/msg00207.html (8,031 bytes)

10. LF: F6BWO (score: 1)
Author: "Hugh" <>
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 23:20:17 +0100
Hi, Nice signal from F6BWO received at M0WYE at 20:00 this evening (9th Feb) I couldn't see the station you were working, I got "...5TGC Also G3LDO and M0BMU storming in as usual ! 73 Hugh M0WYE JO01
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-02/msg00209.html (7,435 bytes)

11. LF: Re: G0MRF's class D transmitter for 136kHz (Radcom January) (score: 1)
Author: "Hugh M0WYE" <>
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 13:58:20 +0100
Hi Jan-Martin, Yes I had to look carefully to find details of the power supply (I thought the transformer in the picture definately wasn't 300VA !) On page 65 (column3) in the February issue, it talk
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-02/msg00235.html (9,541 bytes)

12. LF: Re: "Decca-type" coils (score: 1)
Author: "Hugh M0WYE" <>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 17:15:12 +0100
Hi Peter Hello lf-group, is there any formula to calculate a loading-coil like the Decca-type? Abt 3 mH might be required. By "Decca-type" I presume you mean "basket weave" Alan Melia has pictures an
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-02/msg00240.html (9,651 bytes)

13. LF: Re: who was it (score: 1)
Author: "Hugh" <>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 09:19:47 +0100
Hello Uwe, I was in QSO with Jim, M0BMU at that time. I expect what you saw was Jim sending something like "so 73 Hugh sk" I doubt that you would have seen my transmissions, as I was running about 30
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-02/msg00247.html (9,064 bytes)

14. LF: Re: Re: Who was sending DFCW ? (score: 1)
Author: "Hugh" <>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 09:18:48 +0100
Hi Dave, I'll be ready for you next time ! Wobbles. Yes, the wobbles are entirely mine. The set up is far from ideal at the moment. Please try again if you see me on. 73 Hugh M0WYE It was me! And it
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-02/msg00248.html (10,273 bytes)

15. LF: Who was sending DFCW ? (score: 1)
Author: "Hugh" <>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 22:37:32 +0100
Hello group, Somebody came back to my QRSS3 CQ last night at 19:53, and due to my lack of experiance, I didn't realise it was Dual Frequency CW. Looking at my capture I can see my callsign in there,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-02/msg00253.html (8,371 bytes)

16. LF: QRSS3 tonight (score: 1)
Author: "Hugh M0WYE" <>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 18:27:11 +0100
Hi All, I hope to be sending some CQs in QRSS3 tonight, sometime about 19:30 onwards. QSOs and signal reports always welcome. 73 Hugh M0WYE
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-02/msg00256.html (7,471 bytes)

17. LF: Re: DO NOT READ (score: 1)
Author: "Hugh" <>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 21:04:33 +0100
Hi Mike, et al, Ahh well there a little bit everyone which likes to do what we're told not to ! so. ... DO NOT answer the CQ call that I am presently putting out on 137.677 73 Hugh M0WYE I told you n
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-02/msg00260.html (8,424 bytes)

18. Re: LF: POUR LES FRANCOPHONES (score: 1)
Author: "Hugh M0WYE" <>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 11:51:46 +0100
Hi Rik, Ray, Daniel and Group, We can ALL read a variety of languages thanks to Google's translation page - check out: I cut and pasted Daniel's post into Google
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00069.html (10,840 bytes)

19. LF: Re: Re: Live-Argo/Speclab-Monitor running (score: 1)
Author: "Hugh M0WYE" <>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 10:55:32 +0100
Me too ... Hugh M0WYE I get a page not found message. Mike, G3XDV ==
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00121.html (9,442 bytes)

20. LF: Re: Re: Re: RE: The leT/A of the law (score: 1)
Author: "Hugh" <>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 10:06:48 +0100
Andy, I am terribly sorry, I confused you with somebody else. There are no scurrilous fibs and the fantasy is all in my head. I agree with what you say about the scientific purposes of the transmissi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00199.html (9,008 bytes)

This search system is powered by Namazu