Greetings: I have begun WOLFing on 137.790 from 01 utc to 02 utc every night. The arrival of spring here in eastern Ontario has reduced my ground losses and the signal is somewhat better than before.
Geri: ... are you looking for the explanation of the occasionally reported LDE's (= long delayed echo)? No, not an "explanation" a smaller project to make maybe one variant of LDE's predictable or re
Alan: Hi Larry, well I am not sure that the professionals know a awful lot about 'em. I have been chasing this for a while and almost no information is available in the area that I want to find infor
John: My limited understanding of this subject is that we currently have a two-dimensional view of what is obviously a three-dimensional process. With this limitation, it is difficult to predict the
Greetings All: First, thanks for looking at this. I have a strong interest in figuring out how to tell if a CME from the Sun is going to come within about 7.5 Million miles of the earth. A second lev
Greetings: I see that Jack, VE1ZZ is returning to LF and that he now has "visual ears" as well. There is no longer any reason for my nightly transmissions to Europe from 01 utc to 02 utc, especially
Greetings All: For those with an interest the Canadian LF renewal was issued today for VA3LK and VE1ZZ, The renewal is until 2003 which has an ominous tone to it I regret very much. So we are back in
Greetings All: Late this afternoon I had a pleasant telephone call from Jack, VE1ZZ. We discussed the Canadian LF situation and how we will deal with the renewal of the LF project that is currently p
John: I was told yesterday that Jack, VE1ZZ sent out a packet announcement on of his final transmission on 137 at the end of last Month which was the end of the 13 month initial LF project plan. If y
Jim: I would think the fact that Larry is physically relatively close to CFH makes it unlikely that his signal would cause QRM to the users of CFH - I suppose there is an area around Larry's QTH wher
Tom: So below 9 kHz is not a free-bander-area, it has to be still 'administrated'. Interesting point however About this point Tom we start planning another Bastille Day......... Larry VA3LK
Greetings: There is no requirement for any for of authorization below 9 kHz in Canada, this is why the work I did last winter was at 8.998 kHz. I might have it wrong but I suspect the ITU does not go
Greetings All: I see some references to the TS-570 and I have owned two of them and use one almost everyday at my remote HF station. My experience is that this radio is dead at LF as it comes out of
Rik: I am afraid that the dynamic range will be limited by the FM transmitter, not so much by the FM receiver. For a normal voice link there is no reason to have a dynamic range at the TX input (mike
Rik: The critical parameter of a cheap FM-handy (or even a more expensive one) will be the dynamic range. At my station the strongest local station (ON6ND at about 40km) is 70dB stronger than my 'QRS
Wolf: I already considered building a battery-powered remove RX with a 70cm-FM-link to the main station (using a cheap 70cm-LPD handy). The problem is finding a quiet remote RX side where the RX cann
Bob: Looking further ahead, if we can get our permits amended to transmit around 136 kHz, are there any suggestions as to what spot frequencies are suitable? Respectfully request you avoid 136.6 to 1
Brian: Your signal appeared at about 0315 and ran till 0515 utc. Not as good as last time but just about recognisable. The data logger is on auto and set to run till 1000 utc so will put up the pictu
