Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 59 ]

Total 59 documents matching your query.

41. Re: LF: Re: MF ERP Limit... (score: 1)
Author: John W Gould <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 16:58:29 GMT
Roger, thanks for your suggestions below. Very envious of your quiet location.... Unless anyone else has some different views, can I suggest that we call the matter closed, for now. The key issue is
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00026.html (9,578 bytes)

42. Re: LF: RE: 500kHz Distance (score: 1)
Author: John W Gould <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 11:56:02 GMT
No Johan, not even copper these days... 73 John, G3WKL
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00044.html (9,092 bytes)

43. Re: LF: RE: 500kHz Distance (score: 1)
Author: John W Gould <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 07:29:58 GMT
Jim, thanks for clarifying - I thought that you were opting more for the existing ERP approach. I feel that we are more likely to get a better response asking for an increase in ERP as this is easier
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00046.html (12,128 bytes)

44. Re: LF: RE: 500kHz Distance (score: 1)
Author: John W Gould <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 07:18:17 GMT
Sadly not! More like water pipes at our daughter's home.... 73 John, G3WKL
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00047.html (9,358 bytes)

45. Re: LF: RE: 500kHz Distance (score: 1)
Author: John W Gould <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 20:25:05 GMT
Thanks Jim, I tend to agree with you, but I'm not quite sure whether you are supporting the 20W power to the aerial limit, with the additional ERP ceiling that Rik was proposing. Apologies for not un
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00049.html (11,075 bytes)

46. Re: LF: RE: 500kHz Distance (score: 1)
Author: John W Gould <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 11:35:14 GMT
Alan, thanks for your comments appreciating the work that has gone on these past years to get to this position. As I said in my reply to Laurence it's very much a team effort as you appreciate, with
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00051.html (15,353 bytes)

47. Re: LF: RE: 500kHz Distance (score: 1)
Author: John W Gould <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 11:36:59 GMT
Thanks Rik, that's an interesting thought to have a max ERP stipulated. It might make matters easier with Ofcom as they would be able to consider the worst case. 73 John, G3WKL
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00052.html (10,220 bytes)

48. LF: RE: 500kHz Distance (score: 1)
Author: John W Gould <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 21:26:01 GMT
Thought that I had better respond to Laurie's e-mail, now a few days ago. This is because the matter of the power level is to an extent under review by Ofcom. If you recall we, RSGB, asked back in 20
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00055.html (12,362 bytes)

49. Re: LF: 500kHz ERP (score: 1)
Author: John W Gould <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 16:55:01 GMT
Thanks for your input, Marcus. You usefully considered the issue from a number of perspectives. 73 John, G3WKL
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00061.html (12,465 bytes)

50. RE: LF: RE: 500 kHz license refused in the Netherlands (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 16:43:00 +0100
Thanks Jean-Louis, but the critical issue is whether REF have managed to convince Agence National des Frequencies to support the BNetzA proposal at WRC07. 73 John, G3WKL REF-Union too, within IARU is
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00103.html (10,404 bytes)

51. RE: LF: RE: 500 kHz license refused in the Netherlands (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 16:43:00 +0100
Dick, that sounds positive, but the critical thing with be whether your radio agency will state at the WRC preparatory meeting later this month in Amsterdam (I believe) any support for the BNetzA pro
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00104.html (15,105 bytes)

52. LF: RE: 500 kHz license refused in the Netherlands (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 11:09:43 +0100
Dick, sorry to hear that, but in a way it's understandable. Can I suggest that you contact Sioerd, PA0SHY, VERON HF Manager, and bring his attention to the posting by Ulrich, DK4VW, DARC HF Manager,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00108.html (13,024 bytes)

53. LF: RE: Re: Rugby - Anthorn (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 09:36:12 +0100
I didn't take much interest in this thread until I realised that my MSF clock was free-wheeling. I've had to find a new position and orientation for it in order for it to lock onto the Anthorn signal
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00263.html (11,647 bytes)

54. Re: LF: 500 khz ERP (score: 1)
Author: John W Gould <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 18:28:48 GMT
Mal, thanks for your input, all noted. 73 John, G3WKL
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00381.html (10,361 bytes)

55. LF: RE: 500Khz Nov (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 16:58:19 +0100
Paul, we put the page up at http://www.rsgb-spectrumforum.org.uk/ofcom_501kHz_%20srp.htm to help with the applications. RSGB assists Ofcom with the approval process and what we are looking for is an
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-07/msg00059.html (10,530 bytes)

56. LF: RE: RE: 500 - QRP tests 14/8/07 (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:56:13 +0100
I thought that I would resend this as I would really like some figures on paths of this length. Since I sent the e-mail yesterday it looks as if I will need to provide a short report to Ofcom at the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-08/msg00092.html (11,839 bytes)

57. LF: RE: 600 V 160 (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:38:20 +0100
Mal et al, it will be an interesting comparison, but it will be the ERP (estimated or otherwise) that will be important, as well as some absolute measurement of the noise floor on each band. Incident
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-08/msg00108.html (9,119 bytes)

58. LF: Summary reports from typical urban station... (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 19:16:42 +0100
I've had an extremely detailed reply (direct) from John, GM4SLV, that will greatly help me draft a decent paper for the Ofcom meeting. However, as John points out his experience is one that represent
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-08/msg00115.html (9,077 bytes)

59. LF: RE: 500 - QRP tests 14/8/07 (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 21:16:17 +0100
John, this and the recent contacts with G3OLB are of interest to me, given their range, as I've no doubt that Ofcom will want some feedback on what we are achieving in terms of range. We have as you
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-08/msg00381.html (10,621 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu