Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 737 ]

Total 737 documents matching your query.

261. Re: LF: Any working grabbers tonight? (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 23:51:26 +0000
Hello again, I've got a second version http://www.sighthound.demon.co.uk/gm4slv/grabber.htm Showing 507.3 - 507.5 Good luck, John
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-11/msg00587.html (9,987 bytes)

262. Re: LF: Re: Re: 500/137 XBAND QSO (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:49:25 +0000
So I guess a TX power no greater than 4W would be sufficient to meet the 1W ERP limit? A super efficient, optimally tuned Class-E single-FET amplifier capable of the necessary power would indeed fit
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00012.html (10,997 bytes)

263. Re: LF: Re: RE: MB beacon in France (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 14:01:30 +0000
Oh... he's already tracked down the brigand, didn't take much work with the goniometer.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00108.html (9,081 bytes)

264. Re: LF: 500 Khz modes (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:55:06 +0000
Aren't RTTY, SITOR etc. "Radiotelegraphy" modes? Morse coded, ON-OFF keyed, carrier is one, but not the only, "radiotelegraphy" mode.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00146.html (9,145 bytes)

265. Re: LF: WSPR and CW (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 09:56:52 +0000
As an aside, and again not really applicable to LF/MF, there are other "soundcard data modes" that give similar "below the noise" performance. Olivia is one such mode, and I have successfully had QSO
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00239.html (10,095 bytes)

266. Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: 500 Khz modes (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:49:23 +0000
While you wait for Mark's answer to YOUR question, perhaps you could answer the many previous requests for information of your own 500kHz transmitter and your station's ERP? No..? Thought not
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00244.html (9,562 bytes)

267. Re: LF: Re: Re: 500kHz WSPR Beacon (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 10:07:45 +0000
Scott, it's even worse than that! Mal isn't often to be observed moving his transmit frequency to match the other station, so his QSOs usually take up double the bandwidth than is needed, and on top
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00315.html (12,090 bytes)

268. Re: LF: Re: 500 acty (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:55:55 +0000
Wow! You mean that in Canada a "real radio amateur" isn't required, by law, to spend all his spare time chasing DXCC, with a straight key and a homebrew transmitter? How enlightened your laws are, I
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00323.html (9,071 bytes)

269. Re: LF: 500KHz QSB (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:51:35 +0000
Hello Gary, LF, For a nice view of selective fading on 500kHz my grabber is currently showing the effect, and generally does at night, now that the Faroe AMBC station on 531kHz is radiating wideband
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00658.html (11,143 bytes)

270. Re: LF: Re: Re: PROPAGATION WSPR (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:58:18 +0000
A (very)small sample of the gear I look after, day to day. http://www.sighthound.demon.co.uk/bressaymux1.jpg http://www.sighthound.demon.co.uk/bressayrbstest.jpg http://www.sighthound.demon.co.uk/bre
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00006.html (11,598 bytes)

271. LF: G0NBD WSPR 503.637 (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 21:50:30 +0000
Hello LF, G0NBD has been received at up to -5dB here, on 503.637, yet no sign of a spot from anyone else on WSPRNET. I wonder if it's because we're all on different dial frequencies? Due to Gary usin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00008.html (8,623 bytes)

272. LF: Grabbers (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 21:09:02 +0000
Hello LF, I find it strange that the number of grabbers active should be used as a measure of the conditions and activity levels of the LF bands. Surely died in the wool "real radio amateurs" - who e
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00024.html (8,714 bytes)

273. Re: LF: WSPR on 503.5k (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:15:28 +0000
Andy, Jim et al, Just retuned to 502kHz to see if I can copy any WSPR from you Andy, Also the grabber at http://www.sighthound.demon.co.uk/gm4slv/gm4slv_136800.jpg now will show the band 502.3 - 504
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00048.html (8,789 bytes)

274. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5 (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:02:46 +0000
Hello Mike, LF This is precisely why I thought it might be instructive to report TX power! In the above example, of an inefficient antenna and 800W vs an efficient antenna and 100W for the same ERP,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00054.html (12,218 bytes)

275. Re: LF: WE2XGR/2 in WSPR mode (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:57:49 +0000
Hello Jay, LF, I'll do the same as Chris with my RX setup. Should be intersting to look at the results in the morning. Cheers, John GM4SLV
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00078.html (10,937 bytes)

276. Re: LF: WE2XGR/2 in WSPR mode (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:01:58 +0000
Hello Jay, LF, I've just retuned, to 507kHz dial, at 20:00 - I'm hoping to catch the first of your tranmsit periods and will continue through the night. RX setup is identical to the last test, same a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00091.html (10,511 bytes)

277. Re: LF: Re: Re: PROPAGATION WSPR (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:42:06 +0000
Of course the rusty razor is only to be used for very delicate goat surgery
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00092.html (11,072 bytes)

278. Re: LF: RE: Re: WSPR Beacon on 503.5kHz (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:57:59 +0000
Andy, LF, I have had no problems with the serial port PTT control of WSPR. With a normal 9-pin RS232 port, on the motherboard of the PC, I use the RTS line for PTT switching, via a simple transistor
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00094.html (10,987 bytes)

279. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ? (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:51:50 +0000
1st decode was +1dB s/n 2nd dropped to -15dB That's QSB for you! Cheers, John p.s. Is there any chance of adding a more accurate (ie 6-figure) locator to the database? I think the WSPRnet database st
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00095.html (12,010 bytes)

280. Re: LF: Re: WSPR beacon on 136kHz (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:35:03 +0000
You're welcome Markus! It's great to see and hear you at this distance. The 23:30 transmission decoded at -15dB I see Jim also is on the band now, at -12dB 137.500kHz Cheers, John On Thu, 15 Jan 2009
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00112.html (11,046 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu