Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 296 ]

Total 296 documents matching your query.

21. Re: LF: ARRL News Story, an objection (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:22:12 +0000
Hi, Larry and others Since *our* "ox is being gored" (please note the spelling of the word--it's "gored"; I'll assume that you typoed it, just as I did in one instance of two of your call sign in ou
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00334.html (12,198 bytes)

22. Re: LF: Re: Re: ARRL News Story (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:17:49 +0000
readers. I agree entirely that 100% accuracy should always be the aim, and I believe that RadCom and QST both have a high hit rate, but the point I was making was that a story with some errors in it
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00335.html (10,264 bytes)

23. Re: LF: ARRL News Story, an objection (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:16:58 +0000
Hi, Larry and others Since *our* "ox is being gored" (please note the spelling of the word--it's "gored"; I'll assume that you typoed it, just as I did in one instance of two of your call sign in ou
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00336.html (12,219 bytes)

24. Re: LF: ARRL News Story (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 18:39:20 +0000
Hi Mike and Andre, Sorry, I did not mean to criticise. Thought you did not like critisism. You even fooled ARRL with misinformation. It was just that I do not wish to claim or appear to claim someth
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00400.html (9,618 bytes)

25. Re: LF: ARRL News Story (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 18:39:12 +0000
It has been pointed out, quite correctly, that the ARRL story about LF operating has errors in it. In defense of my fellow journalists, I will say that given limited resources What limit resources??
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00401.html (11,419 bytes)

26. LF: G3IPL/73 (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 19:30:45 +0100
Hello All G3IPL/Don died suddenly last week. He was issued with one of the original 73 khz permits. He was licensed in his early teens and was only 66 years old. 73 de Mal/G3KEV
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-03/msg00054.html (7,647 bytes)

27. LF: corrections (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2001 19:26:22 +0000
There seems to be so many mistakes in the latest COMIC. Who did the proof reading before publication? Can I get a hardback of the corrections? There is no excuse for this amateurish edition. I bought
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-03/msg00390.html (8,252 bytes)

28. LF: qso (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 18:09:53 +0100
Hi John Thanks for the nice cw qso this morning on 7 mhz. Your 50 watt tx was doing well at this late hour this morning 0930 local time. I worked a few JA stns last evening and seemed to be the only
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-04/msg00016.html (8,257 bytes)

29. LF: 73/136 khz (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 20:17:58 +0100
Hi All I have not seen any info for ages about acty on 73 khz. Is anyone active or interested in this band at present. I will be in GI land in a couple of weeks time and could be active on 136 khz an
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-05/msg00063.html (9,007 bytes)

30. LF: LF GROUND SYS (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 05 May 2001 18:59:04 +0100
G3AQC in a recent message stated that the normal radial ground system was poor on LF and I totally agree and SAID so many times away back, some are slow on the uptake !!!!!!!!!! 1. Use insulated radi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-05/msg00270.html (9,626 bytes)

31. Re: LF: Need (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 18:45:44 +0100
<< Hi All Sorry not LF. Does anyone have a cct diagram of a Microwave Modules 2m 100w lin amp type MML 144/100-S. Yes, I have that circuit diagram. (with a SRF1397 as the amplifer?) Would you like a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00203.html (8,899 bytes)

32. Re: LF: RE. 73Khz. (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 08:39:58 +0100
Laurie Mayhead wrote: In a recent mail Mal said that he was not surprised that my sigs were heard/seen in Canada, and that all that is required is a high/ long Ant and 1-5W ERP. This is quite true bu
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00216.html (10,186 bytes)

33. LF: 73/136 KHZ (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 10:06:34 +0100
I will be at my alt qth south of Cookstown/Tyrone from the 12th June for a couple of weeks. I will try and get on 136/73 khz if I get time and will be looking especially for M0BMU on 73 khz and IK5ZP
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00217.html (8,061 bytes)

34. Re: LF: Wire in the Air more info. (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 07:48:40 +0100
Laurie Mayhead wrote: During the T/A tests last winter I ran out 2 additional radials 150 ft. long into the sea water with 4ft long earth rods. Recently the grass had to be cut so I brought these rad
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00218.html (10,196 bytes)

35. LF: Need (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 14:35:05 +0100
Hi All Sorry not LF. Does anyone have a cct diagram of a Microwave Modules 2m 100w lin amp type MML 144/100-S. Your help would be much appreciated and if possible send it as an attachment to me direc
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00223.html (8,204 bytes)

36. LF: 73 khz (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 08:47:25 +0100
Hi All I am not surprised that Laurie has been seen/heard on 73 khz in VE1. I said in a message some months ago that 73 khz was suitable for a transatlantic qso, under normal to good propagation cond
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00227.html (8,964 bytes)

37. Re: LF: 136 dead band. (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 17:58:32 +0100
Come on you lot let's have some activity on 136! There is absolutely no static on the band this Sunday morning and no activity either. Where are all those who advocated Saturday and Sunday activity
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-07/msg00005.html (10,369 bytes)

38. Re: LF: Case for a 500kHz Amateur Allocation (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 18:00:33 +0100
At LF Forum events at the annual RSGB HF Convention and more recently at the Friedrichshafen Hamfest 2001 a number of amateurs expressed interest in a 500kHz allocation. I am thus fairly convinced t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-07/msg00045.html (9,991 bytes)

39. Re: LF: Re: ZL-VE ERP? (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 11:54:44 +0100
Hello Bob, experience on136kHz showed that long horizontal wires can put out very strong skywaves. ie. OH1TN and DJ9IE use long horizontal wires and are amongst the strongest signals here. Reino (OH
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-07/msg00073.html (9,721 bytes)

40. LF: 60 khz (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 18:19:20 +0100
It seems that the 60 khz time standard tx has gone qrt, more unreliability for those depending on it for clock control. Maybe I should have bought a clock that works from a foreign tx source or GPS.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-07/msg00079.html (7,663 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu