Thanks Paul Now that HAS made me smile. Eddie IC-R75 / Mini Whip in KP03TD Using WSJT-X v02, r2706 on Mac Mini / Windows 7 64-bit BR Paul-Henrik, OH1LSQ -- No virus found in this message. Checked by
Hi Stefan Nice signals from your WSPR transvserter. Here is a pic to go to bed with showing your -1dB signal. http://i221.photobucket.com/albums/dd243/radiotalk/475khz_zps077e0e98.jpg 73 GN Eddie On
Well done Markus, I am going to bed in disgust, will look at things again in the morning. Eddie G3ZJO On 27/10/2012 23:58, Markus Vester wrote: Many thanks to Nic F4DTL and Michekl F5WK for the fine
Hi Stefan I see what you mean, so we have both been at it, (upsetting Mal some more). :-) What a beautiful clear clean bench surface you have, I had to carefully frame my pictures after pushing aside
Alright, alright, let go of my arm. :-) Actually I though of looking when you said earlier but I have been doing other things. Using my 40m Doublet for 136KHz not too much plasma QRM yet. Reports via
Yes Roger you can. Send that :- 1424 10 -14 0.2 1402.60 0.00 BRILLIANT On 29/10/2012 13:46, Roger Lapthorn wrote: Brilliant!! LF, Am 29.10.2012 00:50, schrieb Graham: JT9 what is the qso mode
Thanks Dave I noticed a lack of de-codes but didnt check. Hmm 23.9 sec slow !! what has happen to the time sync I will keep an eye on it. 73 Eddie I'm seeing strong WSPR signals from you this afterno
G3ZJO wrote: I will leave it for another day, and possibly get rid of these false de-codes, as below, copied from Steinar's post, I am getting them by the dozen on two XP RX/Computer set ups it could
Hi Gerhard FB Eddie On 31/10/2012 21:31, Beckmann, Gerhard wrote: Hello Eddie, will call now in JT9-2 on 474 kHz and monitoring on 501,4 kHz 73 de Gerhard == Von: owner- [email protected]
No de-code at 1536 visible frequency drift on your signal 1540 OK. Eddie On 31/10/2012 15:36, g3zjo wrote: Hi Stefan Consistent results at this time. big file of reports later. Eddie
Earlier today I sent another possible message :- I LOVE MAL :-) Eddie On 29/10/2012 12:44, Stefan Schäfer wrote: LF, Am 29.10.2012 00:50, schrieb Graham: JT9 what is the qso mode exactly ? Is th
WOT only 10,000 times different.;-) Eddie With this new version r2711 the dynamic decode range is > 70 dB will do exact measurements tomorrow. 73, Albert PA0A
Hi Stefan 02r2702 seems to have cured the nasty rattle at COM Port release here. Non de-code checks done here today on JT9-2, it looks to me that your TX / RX need to be stable over the 2min period t
FB Steinar. :-) :-) :-) I am saving all the audio files now, if you or someone else need them. LA5VNA Steinar loc:JO59jq Mal and spam filtering: STRONG www.opera.no Den 31.10.2012 17:36, skrev Steina
Thanks Albert Thought as much, that is the problem with a low signal, only some times you get me de-codeable. I will leave it for another day, and possibly get rid of these false de-codes, as below,
Just testing at the moment running JT9-2 BEACON All is working well now except for the Phantom signal that appears on the waterfall after receiving a signal. Had a long QSO on JT9-1 with G3XIZ this m
Many thanks for sending me the files you recorded at 2114 2120 2128 2142 and 2150 UTC on October 30. They are much appreciated. As far as I can see they decode just about as expected. See http://phys
