Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 510 ]

Total 510 documents matching your query.

281. LF: LF activity (score: 1)
Author: "g3ldo" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 22:18:59 +0100
Heavy rain so I have had to postpone further 73kHz antenna tests for the time being. I will be transmitting on 137.3+ tonight (Sat) and tomorrow for QRSS contacts. Regards, Peter, G3LDO Web <http://w
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00162.html (8,712 bytes)

282. LF: Re: antennas (score: 1)
Author: "g3ldo" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 21:20:00 +0100
No. Sorry if I was unclear. I have three top wires, 18m long, running parallel and spaced 0.5m apart. The wires have always been joined at the far end, and this helps reduce the corona losses. I also
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00190.html (13,595 bytes)

283. LF: Jason/antennas (score: 1)
Author: "g3ldo" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 01:04:18 +0100
First of all congratulations to Jim and John for another 'first'. Congrats also Alberto and Vittorio for their excellent S/W and its success in this experiment. I am still plugging away at trying to
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00210.html (11,559 bytes)

284. LF: Re: Earth resistance (score: 1)
Author: "g3ldo" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 01:25:20 +0100
The weather in the last few days has been very wet and the lawn is saturated. The maximum antenna current is 3 amps and that is after I have adjusted to matching transformer to try and compensate fo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00272.html (10,389 bytes)

285. LF: Re: Earth resistance (score: 1)
Author: "g3ldo" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 00:04:25 +0100
I had reported earlier that my antenna current varies considerably for reasons that I don't understand. Last week, during a session of 73kHz T/A tests the weather was very cold and dry with a moderat
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00274.html (10,339 bytes)

286. LF: Re: Qso procedure (score: 1)
Author: "g3ldo" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 23:23:37 +0100
During my first cross-band QSO with VE1ZJ in September 2000 I was unsure what to send - in the end I sent all the call signs TNX and 73s - the lot. However conditions where good and with 3 second dot
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00276.html (9,042 bytes)

287. LF: Re: Re./ 75kHz HBG Plotting etc (score: 1)
Author: "g3ldo" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 13:14:27 +0100
I agree with Peter, Dex's information is very useful,and certainly 73 appears very stable. However it is still dependant on solar conditions,at the moment Kp is very low but it is unlikely to remain
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00360.html (9,309 bytes)

288. LF: Re: 75KHz HBG Plotting, New and Improved, same price! (score: 1)
Author: "g3ldo" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 01:28:52 +0100
Dexter, your HBG plot is most interesting and shows a greater stability of signal strength over the night period than on 136kHz. This implies that a cross-band QSO/HF would be possible even with the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00369.html (9,779 bytes)

289. Re: LF: 73kHz (score: 1)
Author: "g3ldo" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 10:51:43 +0100
That was quite an exciting night. Started transmitting at 2200 on Tuesday night and later was getting reports from John and Dex through their website postings. I decided to go to bed at 0100 and went
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00395.html (9,457 bytes)

290. Re: LF: 73kHz (score: 1)
Author: "g3ldo" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 23:39:35 +0100
I completed the move of my best receive loop to hopefully a quieter location. It is now about 100 meters from the house. I am still receiving QRN from a few storms about 500 km to my south east. Howe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00404.html (8,737 bytes)

291. LF: argo (score: 1)
Author: "g3ldo" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 20:56:37 +0100
Hi Alberto I got round to downloading Argo 131 at last but I when I start up I get the message " is not a valid integer The screen display is then shown and when a signal is input to the soundcard th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00407.html (9,484 bytes)

292. LF: 73kHz T/A (score: 1)
Author: "g3ldo" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 15:24:24 +0100
Received G3LDO with a fairly good signal, especially considering that the antenna was the dipole for 80m, absolutely untuned on 73 kHz. Screen capture attached. Thanks for the report Alberto. k inde
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00412.html (10,327 bytes)

293. LF: Re: Re: 73kHz T/A (score: 1)
Author: "g3ldo" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 05:13:47 +0100
John's recordings show the usual after midnight fade. I have just been down to the transmitting shed and all looks OK except that the antenna current is down. I am not sure what causes the variation
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00413.html (11,489 bytes)

294. LF: Re: 73kHz T/A (score: 1)
Author: "g3ldo" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 01:58:31 +0100
Thanks to John and Dex for monitoring the signal frequency. I am shutting the transmitter down now at 0100. Will be on at around 0515 to test the enviorionment theory. Regards, Peter, G3LDO Web <http
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00415.html (9,678 bytes)

295. LF: Re: 73kHz T/A (score: 1)
Author: "g3ldo" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 01:44:47 +0100
John & Dexter My! that's quick feedback. My frequency counter says 72.40043 John's recordings show the usual after midnight fade. I have just been down to the transmitting shed and all looks OK excep
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00416.html (10,735 bytes)

296. LF: Re: Re: 73kHz T/A (score: 1)
Author: "g3ldo" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 01:03:42 +0100
Hi John, I was a little late in starting, but I'm posting screen captures of 72.400 - 72.401 every 15 minutes, starting at 2335 UTC. There appears to be a signal at 72.4004. I have a Loran line at 72
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00417.html (10,556 bytes)

297. LF: 73kHz T/A (score: 1)
Author: "g3ldo" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 23:09:11 +0100
kp index low I will switch 73kHz tx on 72.4003, QRSS120, for a couple of hours starting now 2215 Regards, Peter, G3LDO Web <http://web.ukonline.co.uk/g3ldo>
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00419.html (9,798 bytes)

298. LF: Re: 73 KHz QSO (score: 1)
Author: "g3ldo" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2002 20:24:24 +0100
Back in business again, thanks to GI1PHF, who got the bits PDQ. Only one device had popped, ..... The fix worked well. We had a QSO at 1630 today on 71.7kHz. Ians's signal shown in the attachment (i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00432.html (8,822 bytes)

299. LF: Re: 73Khz Test. (score: 1)
Author: "g3ldo" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 20:21:55 +0100
I have just had the shack/office redecorated and carpeted (luxury at last). During this time all the computer and ham radio gear had to be dismantled although I did manage a contact on 73kHz from the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00449.html (8,610 bytes)

300. LF: : 73kHz (score: 1)
Author: "g3ldo" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 22:01:15 +0100
Started sending QRSS3 at 0800 but had to close down at 0820 because I had to go out. When I came back the contractor was here to do some work in the shack/office (I had forgotten about that) so was n
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00531.html (8,635 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu