Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 956 ]

Total 956 documents matching your query.

41. LF: XBAND 500 (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:14:21 +0100
Hi all Xband 500/3533 khz started some time back when there was a request from some EU stns to enable them to have a qso using this method. Their choice happened to be 3533 at the time and it seems t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00174.html (8,608 bytes)

42. LF: 500 DX (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:41:08 +0100
All Since the unusually good condx a couple of weeks ago the band has reverted back to normal. I have not heard Uncle Sams boys. since then and I dont suppose they have heard me. When condx on 500 ar
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00175.html (7,910 bytes)

43. LF: DX/VE (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 19:17:00 +0100
I received a dispatch from abroad that some UK stns are being heard in VE. There are some VE/W stns listening for G stn acty and will work xband 3533 and 7033 Kcs. A good time is aroundf midnight ie
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00178.html (8,148 bytes)

44. LF: Re: Re: MF WE2XGR/2 and /6 (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 10:55:22 +0100
Hi Ha-jo You went qrt too early and missed all the action. I had a QSO with VE1ZZ at 0117utc I was on 502.5 khz and VE1ZZ 3534 khz. Good copy in both directions. This past few days propagation has be
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00207.html (11,586 bytes)

45. LF: MF CONDX (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 09:55:08 +0100
Hi all Condx on both 600 and 160m have been poor this past few days, nothing hrd from W/VE last night/early this morning at this qth. It seems the vy favourable condx on the 12/13/14 th have fizzled
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00262.html (9,065 bytes)

46. Re: LF: CLASS D E.... Instrumet induced errors ? (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 16:51:21 +0100
It looks like you have a serious problem, sounds more like a Radar tx. The output from my class E is a beautiful sine wave, this is followed by a 5 pole LPF. For testing it is preferable to use a spe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00264.html (12,711 bytes)

47. LF: Re: QSO Etiquette (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 16:23:37 +0100
Hi Roelof Tnx for the call/QSO last nite. There was good propagation to EU at that time. I worked a number of EU stns. SM6NZV, DL1EIE, DJ1ZB, F6CNI, PA0RDT and PA0LCE plus one G stn. 73 and hpe to QS
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00270.html (10,271 bytes)

48. LF: Decca Jeep (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:56:14 +0100
Hi all I wonder how many old 5501 Decca jeeps are still in use on 136 khz, they are such a big heap, and require odd ball voltages. It is so easy to build a compact custom designed class D/E FET ampl
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00285.html (7,715 bytes)

49. LF: 500 XBAND (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:53:08 +0100
Hi all I always check 3533/7033 khz plus/minus qrm when active on 500 khz. This has been very rewarding with lots of real time reports from EU stns not active transmitting on 500. I likewise also lis
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00286.html (8,407 bytes)

50. Re: LF: CLASS E (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:14:07 +0100
You were a late starter on 500. I would say you have missed a lot. G3KEV
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00314.html (10,430 bytes)

51. LF: classs E (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 15:55:36 +0100
Hi all I carried out some analysis on my fet pa today to check the waveform for true class E. Monitoring the drain on a scope revealed that the waveform was almost correct but needed a slight increas
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00324.html (9,007 bytes)

52. LF: qrm 3.5 (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 10:54:59 +0100
Hi all Can anyone else hear the qrm around 3533 khz, its broadband chirping all the time, and vy strong at times. 73 de Mal/G3KEV
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00326.html (7,855 bytes)

53. Re: LF: Re: 500 KHz test (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 10:52:03 +0100
Like u say packet radio is back, why did it go away if it was so good G3KEV reflector, ?
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00351.html (10,412 bytes)

54. LF: Re: RE: CLASS E (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 22:04:56 +0100
Hi Ted I expect it is a single fet, single ended ? How does it perform > Mal/G3KEV by maybe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00362.html (9,992 bytes)

55. LF: Re: My 1st X-Band QSO 3533 / 502 KHz :-) (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:02:47 +0100
Hi Marco. Tnx for the call on 3533 khz and the successful QSO. Sorry you did not work GI4DPE earlier. I got into the shack around 10 pm so missed the earlier activity. I always listen on 3533/7033 kh
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00392.html (9,211 bytes)

56. LF: Re: Recording, condx at it's best: G3KEV working X-band on 502.5kHz (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 11:38:45 +0100
Hi Paul We have a good sea path between us.OH1TN was always vy strong with me on 137 khz cw. Pse work xband 3533/7033 khz for a real time report. Tnx info de Mal/G3KEV LF Condx on 500kHz is just gett
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00397.html (9,663 bytes)

57. Re: LF: 500 G3KEV (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 10:51:49 +0100
Tnx report pse call on 3533/7033 kcs for xband qso 73 de Mal/G3KEV/IO94SH/Scarborough -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] [email protected] To: [email protected] rsgb_lf_group@blackshee
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00428.html (9,321 bytes)

58. LF: CLASS D E (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:40:46 +0100
Hi all Tnx to all for the information, but some of the figures do not work out. How are the % figures measured. One simple method is to calculate the DC input PWR in watts (I x V) then using an RF cu
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00452.html (8,690 bytes)

59. LF: Re: 500 KHz test (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 19:40:32 +0100
Try CW which is the norm on this band, lots of QSO'S within the UK and xband DX galore, at least as far as SV/YU and 9H1. Most UK stns active on CW are being heard in those places. All class A UK rad
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00476.html (10,110 bytes)

60. LF: Re: Cross-band etiquette (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:02:04 +0100
Its the way you "TELL THEM" john. Have you heard the one about the " WHINGING POME" G3KEV
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00479.html (12,924 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu