Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 956 ]

Total 956 documents matching your query.

241. LF: MI0AYZ (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 21:10:58 +0100
Hi Ian Very strong a few mins ago on 137.7 khz qrs. Looks like you have got everyting optimised and working FB. DK1IS active a short time ago but on FSK this time, good signal. 73 de Mal/G3KEV io94sh
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-02/msg00186.html (7,716 bytes)

242. LF: DK1IS (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 19:11:46 +0100
DK1IS nice signal earlier on today on QRS 137.7 approx, observed visually while chasing DX on the other bands. 73 de Mal/G3KEV
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-02/msg00187.html (7,669 bytes)

243. LF: QRS/QRG (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 16:48:04 +0100
While operating QRS plus/minus 137.7 khz it might be better if everyone could get as close to the nominal freq of 137.7 khz instead of a large spread that has been happening recently. This is better
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-02/msg00197.html (8,017 bytes)

244. LF: Re: 137.68 today. (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 22:01:25 +0100
HI Markus, Many thanks for the nice QSO this morning. You were solid 'O' and good copy in the ear. I did not look all over the band but there were several workable signals around 137.7 including OM2
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-02/msg00211.html (9,338 bytes)

245. Re: LF: xtals (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 13:12:02 +0100
-- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Walter Blanchard To: [email protected] [email protected] Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 8:19 AM Subject: Re: LF: xtals At 20:12 0
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-02/msg00216.html (10,739 bytes)

246. LF: xtals (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 21:21:18 +0100
I have a Decca Marine RX, comprising 3 units and a Display unit all tube construciton. Two of the units have lots of high stab xtals. These xtals are glass encapsulated and gold plated construction.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-02/msg00226.html (8,099 bytes)

247. LF: Re: Frustration! (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 19:15:47 +0100
Hi Ed, hi all, been workin the old socks off these last few days only to wind up where I started. Put loading coil outside last Friday and got an immediate worthwhile increase in antenna current. Ev
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00003.html (11,483 bytes)

248. LF: S57A es YU7AR (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 19:26:14 +0100
Both stations always good signals here in Scarborough IO94SH . Please listen for me on normal CW 137.20 khz and reply either on normal cw or QRS on this frequency. I will be active this week and w/en
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00004.html (7,811 bytes)

249. LF: GAIN (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 17:38:23 +0100
I measured the gain today between my 90 metre perimiter vertical loop resonated on 137 khz and my vertical system. The vertical has a 20 db gain over the loop measuring the noise floor. Using the Dec
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00009.html (8,206 bytes)

250. LF: ACTY (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 11:54:07 +0100
Lots of activity this morning. GM0MRF, DL3JMM, I5TGC, S57A and OK1DTN all calling CQ around the same time on QRS apparently not seeing each other, or could it be that they had all worked each other b
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00024.html (8,043 bytes)

251. LF: YI2DX (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 19:17:08 +0100
If everything works out I might be able to re-activate my old call next winter on 136 khz LF. Last used in 1967 from A16H.WEST. QTH about 60 miles west of Baghdad. At that time I was a Technical Advi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00058.html (7,719 bytes)

252. Re: LF: TA 18 March (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 10:13:01 +0100
Same here. DCF39 was way down in the noise and a bit hard to hear. Even the Loran lines were weak. There may have been a trace of a TA signal but nothing identifiable. Hi Joe. Can you work xband say
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00170.html (10,942 bytes)

253. LF: Re: Positions (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 17:49:57 +0100
but All the info you need to calculate lat/lon from LOC yourself is on pages 144-145 of the 2003 edition of the RSGB Yearbook. Just needs a little bit of effort! I do not have this Yearbook and I ex
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00187.html (12,094 bytes)

254. LF: bandplan (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 18:28:58 +0100
The weekend was hectic with QRS acty all active around the same frequency of 137.7 Khz. Condx were excellent and signals from most very strong and I was able to see UA9OC as early as 1858 utc solid O
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00195.html (9,361 bytes)

255. Re: LF: UA9OC (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 19:05:35 +0100
Hi, Mal. They are in MO94TK QTH-loc. Alex I asked for LAT/LON or GRID REF and not LOC. I already have the Loc but my prog needs lat/long or grid ref to calculate the distance. G3KEV 73 de RA9MB/Alex
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00212.html (9,972 bytes)

256. LF: ua9oc (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 19:05:32 +0100
I make the distance from my QTH to Novosibirsk 5030 km if the buckmaster system is correct. I dont have the technical details about pwr and antenna etc at UA9OC but since I first checked 137.7 khz la
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00213.html (9,337 bytes)

257. LF: Re: UA9OC QTH (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 19:05:32 +0100
In message <001601c2eadb$b3191ca0$0de9fc3e@l8p8y6>, hamilton mal <[email protected]> writes Hi All Does anyone have the lat/long or grid ref for UA9OC so that I can work out the distance. Accordin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00214.html (10,123 bytes)

258. LF: UA9OC (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 11:19:18 +0100
Hi All Does anyone have the lat/long or grid ref for UA9OC so that I can work out the distance. He has been a strong signal with me yesterday evening at 1858/1902 and 1958/2006. I was using QRS 3 set
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00231.html (10,736 bytes)

259. LF: UA9OC (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 20:46:57 +0100
UA9OC good solid OOO on 137.7 khz at 1858/1902 utc a short time ago this evening 14/03/03 Others around the freq all calling CQ !!!!!!!!!!!!!! and all at different QRS speeds. No one seems to be list
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00236.html (9,309 bytes)

260. LF: EU Galore (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 20:55:57 +0100
Lots of dx abt to nite two OH stns active earlier on normal CW strong. OH5UFO now so strong on QRS I had to attenuate the signal to avoid blurring the screen. S57A now CQ and strong good OOO on QRS.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00280.html (7,916 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu