Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 92 ]

Total 92 documents matching your query.

41. LF: Attachments - hyperlinks (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 09:56:14 +0100
From Dave G3YMC Note the change of thread name..... 1. I would personally be very happy if the attachment size limit was reduced even more. Most of the recent .gif attachments have no interest for me
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-12/msg00241.html (9,268 bytes)

42. LF: re: Argo - and Opera 6 (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 10:32:44 +0100
From Dave G3YMC re: reported problems with GIF display in Argo with display set to 256 colours. Opera 6 (www.opera.com) has similar problems in displaying JPG images in 256 colours (but OK at the hig
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-12/msg00424.html (8,575 bytes)

43. LF: Re: Notes on virus protection (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 10:04:34 +0100
In fact this will do absolutely nothing with the Badtrans virus. It and a lot of the current viruses do not glean their email addresses from your address book - rather they get them from messages in
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-12/msg00502.html (11,670 bytes)

44. LF: Re: OH1TN calling CQ on PSK31! (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 10:55:06 +0100
I assume on this frequency it was a test transmission. If he had been looking for a QSO he would have operated in the data section (137.4-137.6). See http://www.g3wkl.freeserve.co.uk/lf/136kHz.html 7
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00186.html (10,084 bytes)

45. LF: Re: Band Plan (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 10:04:11 +0100
From Dave G3YMC Bandplans are an attempt to all users of a band to operate in harmony without causing each other interference. I would hope you would see these comments in that light! For instance, o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00426.html (11,555 bytes)

46. LF: Re: Re: New band plan (was: GPS Coherant PSK Transmission) (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 15:18:58 +0100
From Dave G3YMC I2PHD wrote: Just to stir a bit the water, what about the following : 135.7 - 136.0 Long distance (TA or TP), weak-signal modes (QRSS, DFCW,etc.), no CW allowed 136.0 - 137.0 All digi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00449.html (12,152 bytes)

47. LF: Re: Re: GPS Coherent PSK Transmission (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 10:01:52 +0100
From Dave G3YMC I wasn't going to comment, but I will. The current bandplan may be unofficial and a gentleman's agreement (as surely all bandplans are) but it gives a bad impression if a key operator
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00459.html (9,663 bytes)

48. LF: Re: Request to any (relative) OTs out there ! (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2002 07:28:13 +0100
From Dave G3YMC Andy will find an updated version of the huff and puff, using a CD4013 counter, in Technical Topics in the April 1978 issue. This is a reprint of the version which appeared in Ham Rad
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00487.html (9,134 bytes)

49. LF: Re: Spelling of units (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 07:44:29 +0100
In our country units that are derived from the names of scientists are written with a lower case letter; for instance volt, >ampère, watt, etc.; not Volt, Ampère, Watt. When abbreviated we use a cap
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-02/msg00032.html (10,838 bytes)

50. LF: Loop comments (again) (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 09:44:34 +0100
From Dave G3YMC My loop has been in use for well over 3 years now, so the following may clarify recent discussion and surprise some used to 'conventional' vertical antennas. 1. Loops are largely unaf
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-02/msg00164.html (10,645 bytes)

51. Re: LF: Loop questions (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 14:41:02 +0100
From Dave G3YMC ON7YD wrote: The result is that in most cases (and for dimensions that are practical for hams) the efficiency of a short vertical will be a lot better than from a loop with similar di
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-02/msg00181.html (9,883 bytes)

52. Re: LF: Loop questions (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 10:44:45 +0100
From Dave G3YMC Clearly the use of large transmitting loops is outside the terms of the lowfer licence in the US. However use of a receive type loop with many turns of thinish wire (litz or not) for
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-02/msg00186.html (9,423 bytes)

53. LF: Re: RSGB Web site. - off topic (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 10:43:34 +0100
I was not aware that the RSGB offered web space to members. Most providers however require you to upload via ftp - you can do this with IE or other browsers (even Opera), but best to use a dedicated
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-02/msg00187.html (9,374 bytes)

54. LF: Re: CFH (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2002 09:22:06 +0100
I heard CFH yesterday afternoon at over s9 - not far off the signal I copy it (when it is on) at dawn. Normally when I hear it in the daytime it is much much weaker. Are we sure we are listening to C
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-02/msg00241.html (9,033 bytes)

55. LF: Antenna down at G6RO (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2002 09:53:33 +0100
I have received a message via GW4ALG from Ron G6RO to say that the strong winds of this week resulted in damage to his LF antenna, and Ron is currently QRT on 136 kHz. He will repair his antenna syst
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-02/msg00307.html (8,439 bytes)

56. LF: Re: RE: loops (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 15:06:56 +0100
The type of capacitor to be recommended for matching loops is the Philips 386 polypropylene series. Readily available in Europe in 10/22/47 values from 1nF to 100nF and above in 1kV and 2kV ratings.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-03/msg00004.html (9,293 bytes)

57. LF: Junk mail via lf reflector (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 17:07:20 +0100
There have been a number of instances recently (one today) of spam being sent via the lf reflector. The reflector is in fact configured so that anybody can post (try it with one of your alternate ema
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-03/msg00133.html (8,603 bytes)

58. LF: Re: loop/update (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 10:06:24 +0100
From Dave G3YMC It is good that there are now several on the reflector taking a re-look at loops. However I feel there is far too much 're-inventing the wheel'. There has been much information about
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-03/msg00181.html (10,542 bytes)

59. LF: Re: loops (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 10:06:26 +0100
From Dave G3YMC I hope that is just an example. If you really have a transmitting loop with a series R of 5 ohms you are wasting your time. Mine has a dc resistance of around 0.1 ohms, and an effecti
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-03/msg00195.html (9,797 bytes)

60. LF: Re: Re: loops (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 10:56:53 +0100
From Dave G3YMC The main problem with transmitting loops is the enourmous current and Voltage which is generated when exciting them with decent power. It's all very well to put 1W into a loop but try
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-03/msg00254.html (10,286 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu