Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 1138 ]

Total 1138 documents matching your query.

41. Re: LF: Re: QRV tonight (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 19:08:57 +0100
LF ? MF ?   at the moment, near 473.3 : only bia bia bia .. :) Am 02.03.2015 18:52, schrieb Fausto Coletti: I'm waiting you around 19,30 GMT at 473.3...   73, Fausto IK4NMF -- Original Message -- Fro
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-03/msg00021.html (11,260 bytes)

42. Re: LF: MF (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2015 00:03:15 +0100
Thanks Markus ... I tried to leave a trace on the DM4TR grabber,     http://dm4tr.bplaced.net/index.php?section=MF, but's very insensitive in contrast to Stefan's grabber (and G3YXM's grabber which a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-03/msg00062.html (12,765 bytes)

43. LF: G3XBM's 5 mW MF WSPR.. (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2015 00:44:30 +0100
.. didn't only make it into JO42FD again, but was also copied at LA4ANA with a distance > 1000 km. 73, Wolf DL4YHF .
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-03/msg00064.html (7,854 bytes)

44. Re: LF: 477 250 psk ? (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 20:53:54 +0100
Yes of course.. there's life besides on/off keying ! Am 09.03.2015 20:43, schrieb Graham: Sending psk31 ?? 477. 250 ?? G,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-03/msg00124.html (8,771 bytes)

45. Re: LF: 477 250 psk ? (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 21:31:13 +0100
May have been DL3ZID testing various modes... but I also didn't try to decode him tonight. 73, Wolf . Am 09.03.2015 21:04, schrieb Graham: yes not all use morse : ) who was sending ? stopped now befo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-03/msg00127.html (10,379 bytes)

46. Re: LF: eclipse observations on Twente WebSDR (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 12:49:40 +0100
Thanks for the 'fullday' displeay Pieter-Tjerk - very impressive. The frequency of that unstable QRM just below 500 kHz seems to depend on the sunlight intensity ... free-running solar cell inverter
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-03/msg00265.html (10,801 bytes)

47. Re: LF: VLF eclipse report (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 21:54:05 +0100
Hi Claudio, Thanks, very nice photographs there, with the flares on the rim ! Here, only fog during the entire eclipse :o( http://ik2pii.altervista.org/Eclissi/Eclissi_en.htm 73, Wolf DL4YHF .
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-03/msg00276.html (8,522 bytes)

48. Re: LF: MF 630m: False Decode or Real? (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 21:44:53 +0200
Sorry to dissapoint you but .. no, no, no, and again, no. 73, Wolf Am 20.05.2015 20:02, schrieb Jochen Althoff: Just popped up at my RX: 17:52 477 VK3ELV de DF1VB/3 Op8 Deep Search ?? 16348 km -37 dB
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-05/msg00151.html (10,541 bytes)

49. Re: LF: MF 630m: False Decode or Real? (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 22:40:35 +0200
Hi Jochen, I think the discussion about Opera's own 'deep search' mode (or whatever the proper name is) was done here (or on "the other" reflector) over a year ago, and the main problem I see is that
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-05/msg00155.html (13,946 bytes)

50. Re: LF: Spectrum Lab & VLF (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 11:59:12 +0200
Hello Joe, I will check the QRSS120 configuration soon, maybe I had copied the settings from a computer where the input level (soundcard) was rather high, and the signal in your case is much weaker.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-05/msg00222.html (12,111 bytes)

51. Re: LF: 630M WSPR T/A (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 22:55:35 +0200
Am 25.05.2015 20:48, schrieb DK7FC: Hi Eric. Fine. So i will stay silent and stay for RX tonite as soon as the sun goes down on your side. Same here.. and fortunately DK6NI switched back to RX after
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-05/msg00236.html (11,633 bytes)

52. Re: LF: Spectrum Lab & VLF (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 18:10:15 +0200
Hi Luis, The presence and position of the 'waterfall colour to dB' legend is configured in SL's Screen Capture settings: http://www.qsl.net/dl4yhf/speclab/perisced.htm#screen_capture Set the checkbox
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-05/msg00254.html (14,526 bytes)

53. Re: LF: 630M WSPR T/A - WSPR-15? (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 18:24:34 +0200
rrr Stefan and Markus - thanks for the info. I have two instances of WSPR-X running, launched from the same directory, one configured (manually) for WSPR-2 and the other for -15. Not a single decode
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-05/msg00255.html (15,431 bytes)

54. Re: LF: 630M WSPR T/A - WSPR-15? (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 18:47:17 +0200
Ok, I will leave the two instances running. Just got a first decode from WSPR-15 from DF1VB in the neighbourhood: 2015-05-26 16:16   VK3TCT   0.475677   -8   0   QF15bt   +43   19.953   VK3ELV   QF33
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-05/msg00258.html (21,066 bytes)

55. Re: LF: 630M WSPR T/A - WSPR-15? (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 20:38:48 +0200
Hi Jochen, Strange ... I decoded only one out of three your WSPR-15 transmissions. The signal is strong on the waterfall (even on the WSPR-2 w'f) but a slight slant (frequency drift). Anyway, I will
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-05/msg00264.html (15,586 bytes)

56. Re: LF: 630M WSPR T/A - WSPR-15? (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 21:47:08 +0200
Fb Domenico and Jochen... WSPR-15 decodes, with time, rx-SNR,time offset, Freq, Drift, Call, tx dBmW : 1915 -5 0.1 0.475808 -3 DF1VB JO31 20 1930 -23 1.1 0.475821 0 IZ7SLZ JN80 50 73,   Wolf DL4YHF .
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-05/msg00265.html (9,975 bytes)

57. Re: LF: 630M WSPR T/A - WSPR-15? (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 23:07:12 +0200
Received in WSPR-15 so far... 1915 -5 0.1 0.475808 -3 DF1VB JO31 20 1930 -23 1.1 0.475821 0 IZ7SLZ JN80 50 2000 -22 1.5 0.475821 0 IZ7SLZ JN80 50 2015 -8 0.4 0.475808 -3 DF1VB JO31 20 2030 -25 1.5 0.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-05/msg00266.html (12,555 bytes)

58. Re: LF: Dual-speed WSPR (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 09:10:36 +0200
Greetings all, About the different SNR indications of WSPR-2 and -15 : The question is how WSPR estimates the "noise" vale .. possibly using the 'lower quartile' method described by G4JNT once upon a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-05/msg00347.html (21,850 bytes)

59. Re: LF: VLF vorbis stream, Question (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 18:48:17 +0200
Hi Tobias, Stefan and all, Indeed, but despite what Tobias said the Vorbis encoder / decoder leaves extremely weak signal intact, which are *many* dBs below the human hearing threshold. At least with
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-06/msg00119.html (16,423 bytes)

60. Re: LF: SpecLab's frequence selective limiter: Better performance for your WSPR decoder! (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 11:13:18 +0200
Hi Stefan, Thanks for the interesting test. I seem to have little luck with the dropbox links (they almost always result in some sort of file-not-found error) but I can imagine the combination. Maybe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-07/msg00003.html (14,227 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu