In addition to this.. so only visible but not decodable. If the sender is reading this, I suggest to QSY 20 Hz up, or 30 Hz down. << Mystery solved: It's DL3ZID, and for some reason the instance of W
Hello LF-wisperers, I was wondering if F5WK doesn't send wspr spots for M0BMU, and found this: He's sending spots from the future back into the presence ;-) http://www.wsprnet.org/meptspots.php?mode=
Greetings all, Just met G3XDV on 136.7 kHz in CW - thanks Mike - , now still waiting for OE5 or others to become audible. I can see traces of what may be Heinz' CW signal on the spectrogram, but not
Hello Jim, Are you receiving on 137.5 kHz in WSPR too ? I'd like to test from DF0WD, and compare the SNR levels with what I receive from you. Just about to leave for the club station now; I don't kno
Hi Gary, Jim, and all, Michel (F5WK) is now almost not seen on the WSPR & SpecLab display but the signal is decoding fine. With the current settings I have reduced the received signal strength but bo
Hi John P-G, http://www.sighthound.demon.co.uk/gm4slv/gm4slv_136800.jpg Phew, what a beautiful clean "Loran curtain" ;-) Wish I had such a QRM-free place for reception somewhere around here ! 73, Wol
Hi Mike, eBay # 400022294251 That would make a nice 600m amp? or at least an impressive shack heater. 140 to 160 ampere filament current , 7.5 kW anode dissipation :-) 73, Wolf (temperatures about -1
Hello Jim, Thanks for the info. What is your actual ERP then, with the lowered antenna ? For comparison, a few SNR- readings directly from the decoder (at DF0WD; 200 meter wire): 0900 -7 0.5 0.137500
Hi Markus, Jim, and the group, strange ... Markus' signal is so strong here now (after rotating the loop a bit) that it paints the WSPR spectrogram red, but decode took a while. Maybe the decoder doe
Hi Dave, Except from trying WSPR (the standalone GUI version) a few times on shortwave and LF, I can only tell you that.. - it's very important to sync the local PC time accurately - but sure that's
look mum, so many WSJT spotters. And this one from 'across the pond' ;-) 2009-01-25 21:14 M0BMU 0.503499 -26 0 IO91vr +30 1.000 AA1A FN42pb 5248 3261 73, Wolf .
Greetings WSPR spotters and everyone, Many thanks for the WSPR activity. To me, it was a nice way to compare two receiving sites. The first attempt to receive Jim at DF0WD showed: 0900 -7 0.5 0.13750
Hi Jean-Pierre, No personal mail received yet ... What I tried to send you is this info about the frequency offset in your spectogram configuration: (a) the frequency offset for the spectrogram displ
Hello Jean-Pierre, Concerning your SL configuration.. I tried two times with different email accounts to send a response, both of them were rejected by your provider, with this "friendly" info: A mes
Greetings all, Nothing seen / heard from OH here yet, but I'll keep looking. And someone else has a good signal (unmodulated) on 137.517, masking another (guess WSPR) transmission. Cheers, Wolf DL4YH
Hello Andy, If you want to see a REALLY ugly LF exciter, also with I/Q processing : http://freenet-homepage.de/dl4yhf/phasing_lf_exciter/index.html And, not as ugly as mine: http://www.w1tag.com/Phas
Dear QRM-haunted fellows, Searching around for something "completely different", I found this site which may be interesting for some members of the group: http://brneurosci.org/fluorescent-lamp-inter
