Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: NO OPINION (score: 1)
Author: David Pratt <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 20:55:12 +0100
In message <001701c818c6$ee4e9de0$27e4fc3e@g3kev>, hamilton mal <[email protected]> writes Its surprising how many amateurs subscriber to this reflector but have no opinion, SITTING ON THE FENCE.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00412.html (9,587 bytes)

2. Re: LF: MF acty (score: 1)
Author: David Pratt <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:48:48 +0100
The definition of a Beacon is in clause 17(g) of the Amateur Licence and is covered by clause 10 and Schedule 2. Oh and I forgot.... a beacon is (as defined) "automatic transmitting only Radio Equipm
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00445.html (12,205 bytes)

3. Re: LF: MF acty (score: 1)
Author: David Pratt <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:20:37 +0100
You won't be hearing any beacons or data from me on 501-504kHz, Mal, as beacon and data operation is not included on my SRP NoV - just A1A CW. The definition of a Beacon is in clause 17(g) of the Ama
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00477.html (11,337 bytes)

4. Re: LF: 500KHz test (score: 1)
Author: David Pratt <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:19:03 +0000
Received at S7 at Leeds, Gary, but too slow to read by conventional means. The Morse test I took was at 12wpm ;-) 73 David G4DMP IO93hs G4WGT testing on 503.600 KHz. QRSS03 followed by CW ID. 73 Gary
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-01/msg00109.html (10,195 bytes)

5. Re: LF: RE: 500kHz (score: 1)
Author: David Pratt <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:42:18 +0000
John - In the event that the expiry dates of the current NoV permits will be extended, what will be the position as regards extending the permitted modes? My present NoV only permits "A1A, CW". This
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-01/msg00537.html (10,138 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Tick test (score: 1)
Author: David Pratt <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:53:10 +0100
In a recent message, mal hamilton <[email protected]> wrote ... inter alia One was expected to get at least 60% with 70 - 90% not unusual. I would say the standard has dropped dramatically over t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00234.html (10,174 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Tick test (score: 1)
Author: David Pratt <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 17:06:50 +0100
May 1979 73 David -- +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - +
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00236.html (9,997 bytes)

8. Re: LF: CQ 500 (score: 1)
Author: David Pratt <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 16:24:00 +0000
Thanks, Rik, that would explain it. I was beginning to think we might have a pirate on 500! G3KIZ was last in the call book in 1970 and was assigned to a school in Manchester. As I said, the receivin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-11/msg00120.html (10,192 bytes)

9. Re: LF: CQ 500 (score: 1)
Author: David Pratt <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 15:04:25 +0000
I thought I heard G3KIZ calling CQ on 502.6 kHz this morning at 09:55. It could have been you as G3KIZ is not listed in the call book. But I did listen more carefully and it certainly sounded like G3
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-11/msg00356.html (9,672 bytes)

10. Re: LF: 500 acty (score: 1)
Author: David Pratt <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 08:34:21 +0100
You were RST 569 at IO93HS when you called CQ on 502.6 this morning at 07:20z 73 de David G4DMP (also G3KEP) In a recent message, hamilton mal <[email protected]> wrote ... Hi all A look on 500 ab
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-07/msg00569.html (8,845 bytes)

11. LF: 500kHz - Wednesday (score: 1)
Author: David Pratt <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:56:52 +0100
Received G3UNT calling CQ a few times at RST 329 on about 502.0 at 12:35z today. I replied but you evidently could not receive me. There was also some very slow CW a bit further HF but it was too slo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-08/msg00279.html (9,132 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu