Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 225 ]

Total 225 documents matching your query.

81. LF: Re: M0BMU - QRV on 73kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 22:44:21 +0100
Jim, I took a listen but Rugby on 73.3 was rattling away with its dirty modulation. No chance unless you're S9.... unlikely! Rugby usually goes QRT for maintenance on the first Tuesday of each month.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00098.html (9,192 bytes)

82. LF: LF Net (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 13:15:41 +0100
Dear all. Just a reminder about the LF net. Come and fight the QRM on 80m fone, 3646kHz at 1900z on Sunday evenings. The last few weeks we've been struggling for LF operators with only two or three s
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00140.html (7,812 bytes)

83. LF: Re: Collins 300Hz filters for AOR 7030 (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 14:52:51 +0100
Alan and all, On the subject of filter upgrades. INRAD offer an excellent range of filters, although they don't list AOR, but they are very helpful and they do take credit cards. Find them at:- http:
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00142.html (10,822 bytes)

84. LF: Re: Transatlantic Tests January 16, 2000 (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 09:35:36 +0100
Geri, The link doesn't work. I found it at http://home.t-online.de/home/dk8kw/xtzyxmldo.html We've had better copy than that so maybe condx were not too good. CFH is 33dB above noise this morning tho
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00147.html (8,862 bytes)

85. LF: Re: Transatlantic (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 21:16:31 +0100
Dear all, Assuming that we're sticking to 1W erp then what does it matter how big the antenna is as long as the power is sufficient to give the required erp? CFH peaks 33dB above the noise regularly
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00152.html (9,276 bytes)

86. LF: S57A (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 17:51:13 +0100
Dear all I just heard I5MXX working S57A. No sign of S57A here and Marzio only gave him 519... 73, Dave G3YXM
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00270.html (7,420 bytes)

87. LF: Re: Narrow Bandwidth reception (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 22:14:46 +0100
Dear all. I was the other half of the QSO which started this debate, on 73kHz, I don't need FFT to work Graham on 136! I started with the 86Hz bandwidth but my PC runs so slowly that the characters w
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00303.html (9,761 bytes)

88. LF: ITU document. (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 02:36:52 +0100
Dear all. I understand there is an ITU paper ITU-R [Doc.3/14] which deals with Sky-wave field strength at Frequencies between About 150 and 1700 kHz. This sounds as if it may be of interest to us all
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00305.html (7,746 bytes)

89. Re: LF: Selective Level Meter, W&G AT-611, info? (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2000 11:40:30 +0100
A good LF operator should always keep a few old toothbrushes around, just in case Andre' 73, Dave G3YXM.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00339.html (9,299 bytes)

90. LF: 73kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2000 22:22:29 +0100
Dear all, Just a reminder. If Rugby Radio runs true to form, the 73.3kHz tx and all its lovely sidebands will be off for maintenance on Tuesday. It being the first Tuesday in February. If anyone is i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00353.html (7,858 bytes)

91. LF: Re: F is QRV now! (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2000 15:14:16 +0100
Great! Where are they all? what this letter says is, that since December 31, 1999, France has the authorization to use 135.7-137.8 kHz with 1 Watt ERP. 73 Dave G3YXM.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00074.html (8,789 bytes)

92. LF: Re: LF Antenna Radiation (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2000 22:32:02 +0100
Good work Jim and Dave.... Snippety-snip the radiation pattern at ground >level. If the maximum radiation occurs at 20 degrees elevation, you >would have to position the measuring antenna at a height
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00102.html (9,134 bytes)

93. LF: Re: Components used in Ropex TX (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 23:40:29 +0100
Dear Steve and all. The PA devices in the Ropex are IRF1010N mosfets (Farnell part no. 637-397 at £3.10 each) and the driver chip, which may have gone with them, is an SG3525. Farnell part 408-359 at
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00175.html (8,726 bytes)

94. LF: Personal URLs (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 19:56:38 +0100
Dear all. I have just added Cesare's web-site to my LF links list and it occurs to me that there may be some more that I do not know about. If any of you have web pages dedicated to your LF activity,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00212.html (7,893 bytes)

95. LF: GM QRS activity (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 22:07:37 +0100
Dear all. I will be in GM for a few days and intend to try some QRS operation. I will have to repair the antenna so may not be on the air until Friday but, when it is fixed, I will call "on the hour"
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00223.html (7,629 bytes)

96. LF: GM (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 22:13:20 +0100
Dear All. I have just returned from GM. Did anyone else notice peculiar conditions on Wednesday especially with shortish range signals greatly enhanced? G4GVC and G6RO were 599 in New Galloway, about
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00280.html (9,592 bytes)

97. Re: LF: Re: Flare and more flares (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 22:06:15 +0100
Mike, Larry etc. I'll keep an ear on CFH! Dave G3YXM This sounds promising. Mike, G3XDV (IO91VT) http://www.dennison.demon.co.uk/activity.htm
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-03/msg00014.html (8,284 bytes)

98. LF: CFH (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 23:43:00 +0100
Dear all. CFH was quite strong at 2130 gmt then faded almost to nothing by 2155. It is now rising fast at 2215. Much better than usual at this time. Dave G3YXM.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-03/msg00015.html (7,828 bytes)

99. LF: Re: 71.8kHz: 3 stns seen in Nuremberg (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2000 13:33:53 +0100
Markus. 2232 71820..71817 -37dB 159 in cw (unid) someone in fast cw, no aural copy, might have been O in qrss... That was me! Sorry I didn't put out QRS at that time. I could hear nothing on RX due t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-03/msg00029.html (8,458 bytes)

100. LF: Re: 73 kHz: now I am curious (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2000 19:14:54 +0100
Geri. Below 72kHz seems to be quieter for us here due to the QRM from Rugby on 73.3 and all its' sidebands. If it is quieter with you somewhere else in the band then we could transmit there.. My prob
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-03/msg00034.html (8,828 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu