Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 240 ]

Total 240 documents matching your query.

61. LF: Re: s/n shown by wspr .... what is it actually showing ? (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:39:52 +0100
In the ideal case of course you have just receiver noise as your background noise level. So you adjust your sound card input to give you the magic 0dB on that. During the night the static crash level
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00169.html (11,165 bytes)

62. LF: Re: G3XBM 500kHz WSPR tests (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 08:37:44 +0100
I listened again last night Roger between 1920 and 2020z and not a trace of you on the waterfall. SM6BHZ and G7NKS were coming in as normal, though Gus's signal seemed well down on what it was the ni
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00200.html (9,869 bytes)

63. LF: Re: WOLF - ready to RX (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:23:46 +0100
Thanks for the comments John and others. Firstly of course Jim is VERY strong here, well over s9. I did try putting 30dB of attenuation in but he was still moving the meter... I have not at the momen
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00243.html (13,993 bytes)

64. LF: Re: WSPR beacon (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2009 13:09:14 +0100
I have just been doing some more tests on 30m. Clock errors might well have been part of the problem. Initially on 30m the few decodes I was seeing were showing a DT of over 3s, so I had a play with
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00247.html (15,482 bytes)

65. LF: Re: WOLF/WSPR Sound card issues (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:03:42 +0100
OK, I seem to have got WSJT sussed, and it is working. It seems to auto calibrate for the sound card, I have done nothing and the two numbers in the bottom right hand are both close to 1... 192803 14
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00251.html (11,122 bytes)

66. LF: Re: WSPR beacon (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2009 21:20:53 +0100
OK, it looks as if the sound card clock synch error is the problem. As suggested I have been trying recording for the first minute of each period then stopping - by the simple expedient of switching
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00319.html (11,219 bytes)

67. LF: Re: MY first WSPR - by ear ;) (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:31:00 +0100
Not quite Dennis. A WSPR transmission period is 114 secs, starting on each even minute and stopping at 54 seconds after the second minute. These periods are fairly accurately timed. A station transmi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00338.html (12,528 bytes)

68. LF: Re: WSPR threshold reports (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:06:28 +0100
Like G4JNT for instance - way over s9 here and totally flattens the AGC. 73 Dave G3YMC http://www.davesergeant.com
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00365.html (9,522 bytes)

69. LF: Re: WOLF - ready to RX (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:28:31 +0100
You are not alone Roger.... 2009-09-10 20:05:04 >WOLF10 -r 8000 -f 700 -t 10 -d 8 -w 0.0000 t: 24 f:-3.282 a: 0.2 dp:131.5 ci: 1 cj:202 Y 6NQSDZ42XVQHU ? t: 48 f:-3.282 a: 0.2 dp:128.8 ci: 7 cj:252 X
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00422.html (11,500 bytes)

70. LF: Re: 500kHz QRPp WSPR overnight (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 09:41:32 +0100
Still not a whisper on the waterfall last night Roger, just the usual two Jims booming in: 194400 7 -28 1.4 64 0 G7NKS IO92 27 195200 10 15 1.2 -53 0 M0BMU IO91 33 195600 9 -9 1.9 70 0 G7NKS IO92 27
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00460.html (10,304 bytes)

71. LF: Re: wspr (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2009 22:07:56 +0100
Well I seem to be copying something, but no decode of you Jim... 2012 -10 2.1 0.504019 0 SM6BHZ JO57 40 2022 -3 1.7 0.503978 0 G4WGT IO83 27 2026 -10 1.8 0.504022 0 SM6BHZ JO57 40 2034 -8 2.2 0.50392
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00478.html (10,893 bytes)

72. LF: Re: WSPR threshold reports (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:13:32 +0100
Still nothing at all here Roger, there were a couple of very weak broken lines on the waterfall but no copy. I tend to take the dB figures in WSRP with a pinch of salt. Jim, James and Gus are quite s
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00595.html (10,485 bytes)

73. LF: Re: G3XBM TXing on 500kHz WSPR (after a fashion) tonight (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:52:25 +0100
What actual frequency are you transmitting on Roger? As you might have gathered I do have a bit of a problem calibrating WSPR and decoding.... I am running it now, and Argo, and seeing a moderately s
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00673.html (10,070 bytes)

74. LF: Re: SM6BHZ - WSPR Rport nothing further (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 07:58:19 +0100
G7NKS was also on, as you see a bit weaker than Gus but seemed to be sharing the same time slots. (note this is WSJT7 output, which is all that will run on my sound card: Time, Sync, dB, DT, DF, Drif
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00696.html (10,588 bytes)

75. LF: Re: Further QRPpp tests on 500kHz - TX power reduced another 10dB (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:29:27 +0100
And maybe if you take the attenuators out again you will reach the dizzy heights of Bracknell.... I did monitor till around 10pm last night but no sign, but the QRN got attrocious and I even lost cop
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00770.html (9,911 bytes)

76. LF: Re: MY first WSPR - by ear ;) (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:31:00 +0100
http://www.davesergeant.com
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00772.html (12,033 bytes)

77. LF: Re: defence of WSPR Signals (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:00:53 +0100
Well having spent a few days looking at WSPR I would tend to fit best in the 'repetitious rubbish' group.... WSPR is specifically designed for weak signal reception, and there is certainly a case of
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00803.html (10,333 bytes)

78. LF: Re: WOLF/WSPR Sound card issues (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:24:01 +0100
I had a quick play with WSJT7. But it looks as if WSPR was an add on to the original program, its implementation is a bit basic and the GUI totally different from the separate WSPR program. 1. The ba
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00831.html (11,925 bytes)

79. LF: Re: WEB, 505kHz availability (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:28:52 +0100
This was where G3YXM's site originally was. You can now find it at http://wireless.org.uk/ I am sure Dave will comment in due course, I would assume all the stuff on the old site is now on the curren
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-10/msg00154.html (10,334 bytes)

80. LF: Re: RSGB LF award (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 07:34:43 +0100
You contact G3LZQ via the details at the first link I gave...... 73 Dave G3YMC http://www.davesergeant.com
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-10/msg00191.html (8,889 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu